Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:24:10 +0200
From:      Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
To:        Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@uol.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PORTVERSION convention help
Message-ID:  <20010313122410.A20267@rapier.smartspace.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <20010312191512.A47330@Fedaykin.here>; from lioux@uol.com.br on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 07:15:12PM -0300
References:  <20010312191512.A47330@Fedaykin.here>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon 2001-03-12 (19:15), Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 	I've just added ports/devel/understand_c
> with PORTVERSION=14b103 at 2001/03/09
> 	It should be read as version 1.4 Build 103
> 	I will be updating this port to version
> 1.4 Build 104
> 	Therefore, I would use PORTVERSION=14b104
> 	However, after some thought this seems
> unappropriate.
> 	What about PORTVERSION=1.4.b104? Or, should
> I use another combination such as PORTVERSION=1.4.104b?
> Or, 1.4.104? Or, should I maintain the former naming
> convention?

I'd go for 1.4.104

Neil
-- 
Neil Blakey-Milner
nbm@mithrandr.moria.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010313122410.A20267>