Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:27:41 +0200 From: Cezary Morga <cm@therek.net> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: perl@freebsd.org, QAT@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Custom LOCALBASE/PREFIX] net-mgmt/p5-SNMP - fails: makefile Message-ID: <4A5E3BBD.4090308@therek.net> In-Reply-To: <4A5E17CF.20301@p6m7g8.com> References: <20090626154720.157638FCB7@release.ixsystems.com> <4A565D3F.8020903@therek.net> <4A5D1A19.1040506@p6m7g8.com> <4A5D6982.2020308@therek.net> <4A5E03FE.2070104@therek.net> <4A5E17CF.20301@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philip M. Gollucci pisze: > Cezary Morga wrote: >>> I'll prepare an update and fill a PR afterwards. Given that both come >>> from the same source I expect it to build against net-snmp without a >>> hitch. >> Given that net-snmp builds bundled Perl modules by default we have now >> two options regarding net-mgmt/p5-SNMP: 1) disable Perl modules builds >> in net-snmp and update p5-SNMP to 5.4.2.1 or 2) leave net-snmp as it is >> and mark p5-SNMP DEPRECATED with comment 'p5-SNMP is built as a part of >> net-mgmt/net-snmp now'. Personally, I'd opt for the latter. >> >> The current version of p5-SNMP (4.2.7.1) depends on net-snmp4 which is >> deprecated with expiration date 2009-07-01 (two weeks ago) so IMO >> there's no need to keep it around either. >> >> What do you think? >> > As the new maintainer of net-snmp with net-snmp55 in the pipeline, I > like option #2. Given that only two of us showed some interest in this and that we both agree :) I've submitted a PR ports/136802. -- Cezary Morga "Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind." (Terry Pratchett)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A5E3BBD.4090308>