Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:02:17 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Subject: Re: Somethings still up with new NSS? Message-ID: <20030429210217.GB18309@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <3EAECECB.ECB37B03@mindspring.com> References: <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428190209.A21656@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428080505.GA1474@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428105521.GB2676@madman.celabo.org> <20030428111859.GA2923@madman.celabo.org> <xzp8ytts461.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3EAECECB.ECB37B03@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:13:15PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > It probably would have been better to just put a per record byte > order maker in there, instead of using a version number, but you > would still have the same problem for the records without the > marker, so you'd have to ignore them as "suspect". There _is_ a per-record marker. See my posting to -arch yesterday if interested. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030429210217.GB18309>