From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 27 21:03:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D3A16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:03:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198FA43D45 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.139] (port=4305 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1Cj21i-00085w-00; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:38 +0300 Message-ID: <41D078A9.1040508@mail.ru> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:37 +0300 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Gerard References: <20041227200011.GC27571@thingy.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20041227200011.GC27571@thingy.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cheap NAS using FreeBSD - practical considerations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:03:41 -0000 David Gerard wrote: > Let's say that, as fine as NetApps are, I can't afford their prices. So I > set up a FreeBSD box with a whole lot of disk attached and use that as > network-attached storage, serving files by NFS, with gigabit ethernet. > > Setting up such a box is trivially easy. But what are the practical > considerations? Have any of you done this, or know anyone who has? Does > serving stay at wire speed? Recommendations for motherboards or > peripherals? > I built an entry-level file server which has 3*200Gb + 1*160Gb ATA Drives. The motherboard is Abit BE6-II with built-in HPT370 IDE controller, Celeron 950GHz and 384Mb RAM. I don't use HPT Software RAID, ccd or vinum. The net throughput is 10Mbytes/s. 6-7 people often watch movies simultaneously over Samba and don't even feel they're not alone. IMHO, it's very, very cost-effective. I'd put it this way: if there are some OS'es which are good for file serving, FreeBSD is among them. Best wishes, Andrew P.