Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Feb 2001 01:22:29 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> 
Message-ID:  <200102020922.f129MTM12429@mass.dis.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 04:10:42 EST." <5.0.1.4.0.20010202040716.01f2b3d0@marble.sentex.ca> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At 09:08 AM 2/2/01 +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> 
> >Well, as I said, supporting it is not impossible, its just "different"
> >from the way most *ix drivers like things. However if this is important
> >to you or somebody else, I could be persuaded into looking at this...
> 
> 
> I differ to your judgement of course.  If the drive is hopelessly broken 
> from a design point of view, then there does not seem to be much point in 
> supporting it.  But if it can work to a reasonable degree, then I am all 
> for it.  Like I said before, its potentially low cost combined with their 
> claimed reliability of their media over travan tape technology do make it 
> potentially appealing for certain applications.

Media cost for these devices is horrific, due to their relatively low 
volume.  A $200 drive is false economy when the tapes for it are $70 a 
pop...

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102020922.f129MTM12429>