Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:42:46 -0600
From:      "Alejandro Ramirez" <ales@megared.net.mx>
To:        "Jonathon McKitrick" <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Cc:        "Stan Brown" <stanb@netcom.com>, "Free BSD Questions list" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: fsck and large filesystems.
Message-ID:  <02c301bf4d6d$1f6a56e0$d2630a0a@megared.net.mx>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912231725130.21789-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Alejandro Ramirez wrote:
>
> >    It is supposed that if you are using softupdates, you will not have
to
> >run fsck again, but its still enabled by default, just to make sure that
> >everything its ok (by now), this its a quote from a talk with Mr. Kirk
> >Mckusick at FreeBSDCon.
>
> So does this mean softupdates obviates the need to run fsck on an dirty
> partition?  What about / if it isn't soft-enabled?

Then if its not "soft-enabled", you should run fsck in it.

Merry Xmas
Ales




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02c301bf4d6d$1f6a56e0$d2630a0a>