Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 May 2006 02:28:25 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
Message-ID:  <20060504062825.GA42493@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060504062158.GA766@dimma.mow.oilspace.com>
References:  <20060502171853.GG753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <20060502172225.GA90840@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060502174429.GH753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com> <20060502180557.GA91762@xor.obsecurity.org> <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com> <20060502182302.GA92027@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060503110503.O58458@fledge.watson.org> <35c231bf0605031821s582b6d03j3ee9d434a596f62a@mail.gmail.com> <20060504062158.GA766@dimma.mow.oilspace.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:21:59AM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
> Hi!
>=20
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:21:39PM -0700, David Kirchner wrote:
> > However, one could argue that as quotas worked OK in releases prior to
> > 6.0 (and perhaps earlier), that there is a longer-term regression. In
>=20
> I'm interesting about quota and snapshots. Is it work in RELENG_5_5,
> or broken too?

AFAIK they are broken in 5.x too.  It may just be harder to trigger
since the filesystem performance of 5.x is so much worse.

Kris


--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEWZ8IWry0BWjoQKURAhEvAKD2+phSa7L4ozSyRBInkqiH3c3FJQCeOv4x
nNOKggXoRKRXQtymeCDJ00k=
=VGfj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060504062825.GA42493>