Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 12:44:32 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za> To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD-hackers) Subject: Re: IPX now available Message-ID: <199510131044.MAA19862@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <1358.813576972@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Oct 13, 95 10:36:12 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > If we are going to import it, I will create diffs for the Makefiles and > > > the two functions and the man page (ipx_addr(), ipx_ntoa() and ipx.3) for t > he > > m > > > in libc that should be added. > > > > Relative to -current, right? That would be great! > > Could I raise an issue here ? > > I don't think we should add any IPX stuff in libc. > It doesn't belong there based on a projectede frequency of use. > > Can we agree on libipx.a ? > > Yes, before you ask: I would really prefer a libtcpip.a too, but I also > realize it's not practical. > Don't forget libns.a, libccitt.a, libiso.a etc...... :-) I am happy to do it that way for ipx. You don't mention libipx.so.x.x. I don't think a sharable libipx is worth it, with just 2 functions??? John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@csir.co.za
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510131044.MAA19862>