Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:16:14 +0100 From: Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org> To: Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com> Cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: idlc looping compiling XContentEnumerationAccess.idl Message-ID: <20080227181613.GA56598@gate.oper.dinoex.org> In-Reply-To: <20080225212402.GA3003@rancor.immure.com> References: <20080225202309.GA33699@gate.oper.dinoex.org> <20080225212402.GA3003@rancor.immure.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:24:02PM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote: ! I have them both on as well (from the GENERIC kernel). I don't know just ! when I will be able to try again w/o one or both set. This is my primary ! workstation and at the moment I can't afford to reboot it. Thats fine, thank You. I just hoped this way to find out which of the two options makes the difference. But after I have studied what there is to read about both, I come to the conclusion that this might as well be some kind of interdependency of both. At that point it would go into logically analyzing the kernel code, and I'm actually not in the mood for such... Anyway, I am currently trying with PREEMTION set and ADAPTIVE_GIANT removed (which seems the more sensible approach), and this also seems to work. So this is the setup that is my recommendation, for as long as nobody seems interested in a more detailed analysis and remedy (I did post to freebsd-smp). Voila, case closed. :) rgds, PMc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080227181613.GA56598>