Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:37:38 +1000 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any utils worth installing a GUI on a server for? Message-ID: <20150625203738.GA75991@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <558C5F23.2070001@gmail.com> References: <558B3F60.7060809@sneakertech.com> <558B41A3.1050506@gmail.com> <558B45C1.3040101@sneakertech.com> <558B46D4.90505@gmail.com> <20150625065727.e728118a09a939f408ec8526@sohara.org> <558C4756.1030805@gmail.com> <20150625202835.62d37aed@gumby.homeunix.com> <558C5F23.2070001@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 2015-06-25 14:05:55 UTC-0600, jd1008 (jd1008@gmail.com) wrote: > > FWIW ZFS has been a mainstream FreeBSD feature for some time now. It's > > licence allowed the SUN code to run in the FreeBSD kernel whereas > > Linux had to recreate it, or adapt the original version to run in > > userland. > > Yes - the 'fuse' land. > I would love to see io performance differences between the > FreeBSD implementation vs the linux implementation. > I gamble that running zfs in the kernel might provide faster i/o > but not sure how much faster. There's also a kernel version of ZFS for Linux, in addition to ZFS on FUSE. http://zfsonlinux.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150625203738.GA75991>