Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:18:12 +0100 From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org> To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please resurrect trafshow v.3! Message-ID: <20051107221812.58a5552f.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051107150954.F76971@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20051107150954.F76971@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Mon__7_Nov_2005_22_18_12_+0100_as3g4zcQHHR2vdYw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:24:31 +0200 (EET) Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> wrote: > > Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:26:45 +0000 (UTC) > > From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org> > > Subject: cvs commit: ports/net/trafshow Makefile distinfo pkg-descr > > pkg-message.nodevfs pkg-plist ports/net/trafshow/files patch= -ac > > patch-af patch-ag patch-ah patch-configure > > > > jylefort 2005-11-05 14:26:45 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > net/trafshow Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > > Added files: > > net/trafshow pkg-message.nodevfs > > Removed files: > > net/trafshow/files patch-ac patch-af patch-ag patch-ah > > patch-configure > > Log: > > - Update to 5.2.1 [1] >=20 > Is it possible to keep old good trafshow v.3 under, say, net/trafshow3?= I've > tried to use trafshow v.5, but I would say that it violates POLA severily: >=20 > o It does traffic aggregation by default, and it's impossible to turn i= t off > from it's configuration file. >=20 > o It converses numbers to "human-readable" form like '42K' which seems > confusingly less than say '9800' at the first glance, AND it can't be > turned off! >=20 > o Option '-n' turn protocol decoding off. I would say that it's not alw= ays > obvious that protocol 6 =3D TCP even for advanced trafshow user. >=20 > I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't like the new design of good > old trafshow and wants trafshow v.3 to be available. I think these potential inconveniences are best addressed by patching trafshow 5, so that users can have the best of both worlds. --=20 Jean-Yves Lefort jylefort@FreeBSD.org http://lefort.be.eu.org/ --Signature=_Mon__7_Nov_2005_22_18_12_+0100_as3g4zcQHHR2vdYw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDb8SUyzD7UaO4AGoRAop3AJ9SMHfHFiX6WJYDNkDDyNgZMnrPSACfQfU4 KAuv1jQR9M3j+NTb4/Eqwx0= =nMPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__7_Nov_2005_22_18_12_+0100_as3g4zcQHHR2vdYw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051107221812.58a5552f.jylefort>