From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 28 14: 2:20 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1A237B402; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:02:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id 1522D9B08; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:01:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:01:37 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Clive Lin Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/mutt Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20020128220136.GE49984@squall.waterspout.com> Mail-Followup-To: Clive Lin , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200201281806.g0SI6U989949@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020128181626.GA91155@malloc.eb.kliev.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020128181626.GA91155@malloc.eb.kliev.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:16:26AM +0800, Clive Lin wrote: > Since this port has a master in mail/mutt-devel, I have no idea > how to deal with PORTREVISION. I know this MIGHT be solved by > the =? trick, but at least it works if I simply ignore anything > about PORTREVISION... (flame war coat on, and flee ~~~) What's wrong with letting PORTREVISION propagate if the port has a master in mutt-devel? Seems like if the mutt port changes, so should its slave. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message