Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:05:59 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: rcs is gone? Message-ID: <7C8EB71B-DBA4-49F3-80F4-D579A596A540@orthanc.ca> In-Reply-To: <1381193888.1130.42.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <29D748F4-5E38-4587-BC7F-0141234C2F62@orthanc.ca> <F9A84DDF-EC24-42F2-9B34-F5041946293D@orthanc.ca> <EBF54472-4DF9-42AB-9577-B7CEFFFFFA1E@orthanc.ca> <6CEFF9B8-A62A-4616-A0FF-BDDDE1027A7E@FreeBSD.org> <132C8A43-E822-49C3-A1EA-493A40449AD4@orthanc.ca> <AF6F14E9-FBF0-42C6-AE19-3449556E8921@orthanc.ca> <CAJ-Vmo=PrgLWj2TiD8L8g7cx13yzrBYwA8Wt%2B3mVRCRS8f7YXw@mail.gmail.com> <525347DD.5090702@freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmomQsNWo7ahj_3xveWkU_nzqKeezt76z44qi30ua7pLu-Q@mail.gmail.com> <1381193888.1130.42.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the = discussion > involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that = it > showed up in some of the messages there. I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this case) = *needs* to be removed. What, in the current builds of 10.x, is broken by leaving RCS/CVS in = place? And what, as 10.x moves forward towards a public release, will = be broken by leaving this code in the base?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7C8EB71B-DBA4-49F3-80F4-D579A596A540>