Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:07:45 -0700 From: Chip Camden <sterling@camdensoftware.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO? Message-ID: <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> References: <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <BANLkTinoGufNYZmkFgQmwGR4RjBXWXcDTA@mail.gmail.com> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit privilege for all ports. What if certain qualified port maintainers who aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the leaf ports that they maintain? Wouldn't that speed up the overall process? --=20 =2EO. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com =2E.O | sterling@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com OOO | 2048R/D6DBAF91 | http://chipstips.com --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNubsBAAoJEIpckszW26+RmeoH/imGlQmeoMoWvO3077WsJDH+ +aWj/KQ41twPX9N3OWdYlUko+5Vy9S19k8Up4lKA8//LPImD6W4bZCfgeeLajU0x lCrDwr2Yr0IcmpApKykZ6bC9Cili6Y2TrqwttpAGO+CRPTUwspE1NpdRQGzaSgYy RFTJDLPt7lP0o+pZ6AiiRcRpxPkg76vW+kOyxjAxGy//pTjsUUgkdM36HoK01qRd CpJJqQevFnKnlmBajtRgMEu26oDxYNTvwdcd01fusmnrXbyy22u5F2hypfnjKc7q RDxVn9JY6R/14dc0dk9bt0nak1oYnKgBxIFYI+56kIyKPh5jwkUdoThnV1L7Bts= =hin3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110428190745.GE77343>