Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:49:51 +0200 (EET) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sshd. "UseDNS no" ignored? Message-ID: <20061201232848.I53143@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: <C8B42905-2A2B-4959-AF07-C3B4E6860930@mac.com> References: <d8a4930a0611210211q4920bfdkf7f0400c69df2689@mail.gmail.com> <4563126E.2060904@math.missouri.edu> <20061129143330.T82233@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0611301903110.14631@mussel.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20061130205045.A96066@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <3BC50132-2DD9-4FAA-8320-C945DF4BFD48@mac.com> <20061201120708.D81433@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <C8B42905-2A2B-4959-AF07-C3B4E6860930@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello!
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> And I didn't say that it's the OSI Open Source. I wrote "(which is also
>> open-source)", not even "Open Source". So I didn't mean that you can just
>> copy&paste their sources into OpenSSH. [ ... ]
> I'd really prefer that people not claim a license is "open source" without
> submitting their license for consideration to the OSI board via the
> <license-discuss@opensource.org> mailing list, and having it be approved.
Just 2 points:
1) I _didn't_ "claim a license is "open source"". My point is
that all sources of the product are open to your eyes.
No more, but no less.
2) We _aren't_ in @opensource.org mailing list hierarchy - it's FreeBSD
maillist, and I hope I'm free to _not_ submit anything to opensource.org's
consideration, and just to express my opinion instead.
P.S. I apologise for off-topic traffic generation here, but I didn't start
this license-centric bullshit.
> -Chuck
Sincerely, Dmitry
--
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061201232848.I53143>