Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 23:15:14 -0800 From: Josh MacDonald <jmacd@cs.berkeley.edu> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: jmacd@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, jmacd@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: mit-scheme compiles with -O6 Message-ID: <199601230715.XAA13917@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 1996 04:21:42 PST." <199601171221.EAA02193@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I know that's what the original source said, but do we really want to > do this? I've heard that beyond -O2, higher optimization levels will > just introduce more bugs for negligible (or sometimes negative) speed > improvement. > > If you agree to drep this to -O or -O2, I will change it (there is a > hunk in the patch that already contains the "-O6" part :). > > Satoshi I don't think it matters... I'm sure -O2 is fine. -josh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601230715.XAA13917>