Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:45:58 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB
Message-ID:  <20040316034558.GA35676@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040316022337.GA44429@ns1.xcllnt.net>
References:  <2650.192.168.0.200.1079393908.squirrel@192.168.0.1> <20040316000544.GA33122@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040316022337.GA44429@ns1.xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:23:37PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:05:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >=20
> > > It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> > > around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able=
 to
> > > see an accurate display of totals. It just seems pointless to even ha=
ve
> > > this, as 4 GB is just not that much anymore. I know this is a 32bit
> > > limitation of the variable, but that's just bad coding in my opinion =
(no
> > > offence intended), I mean there must be some way around this.
> >=20
> > I think in the past it's been pointed out changing to a 64-bit
> > variable would slow down the code on non-64-bit architectures like the
> > venerable i386.
>=20
> Is there a particular reason I don't know about as to why we cannot
> introduce a MD typedef for counters like this (or even just "long")?
> I mean, if people make the statement that widening counters is not an
> option because it slows down some platforms, I must be missing the
> reason for it to be an all or none kind of issue.

Brooks already mentioned that the counters are already longs, so this
is only an issue for 32-bit platforms (i.e. i386).

Kris

--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAVnh2Wry0BWjoQKURAqQFAKCc2wXPo8gdRZJ+xn0klPKiHA8J1ACgyKPI
M2tmppVCO/0VcZH0Tw/z7eY=
=7aDB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040316034558.GA35676>