From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 21 15:15:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186C1106566C for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from editor@d3photography.com) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8228FC0A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8AB26D77B7; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:15:24 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sjocNaGgojvx; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:15:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.1.198] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6632126D77B6; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:15:06 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:14:51 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <839D32A2-C8E9-4B0E-974F-A1A623414BD8@d3photography.com> References: <27081124F1EC4790981778923D271F59@harwood> To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: A quality operating system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:15:15 -0000 On Aug 21, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Daniel Staal wrote: >=20 >> --As of August 20, 2011 7:01:07 PM -0700, Carl G Smith is alleged to = have >> said: >>=20 >> I have heard that the OS X OS is based on FreeBSD. Is this true? >>>=20 >>=20 >> --As for the rest, it is mine. >>=20 >> Partially. It combines a mostly Mach kernel with some = FreeBSD-derived >> userland and interfaces, then adds a proprietary window manager and = UI on >> top of the rest. >>=20 >> So the largest single source of code is probably FreeBSD, but neither = the >> kernel or the part most people interact with isn't. >=20 >=20 > This is incorrect. >=20 > = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/2008-August/003674.htm= l I read the article... and it says that the largest single source of code = when it was written was FreeBSD. 21MM lines out of 39MM overall. Now since then they've released a lot of new features and what-not so I = doubt it still holds at 53.8% but I would bet it is still the single = largest source of code. Does it matter? No. Thank you.