From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 10 20:16:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0782D2F27C1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 20:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49KwMJ4cLxz4bwx for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 20:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id x17so8386893wrt.5 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:16:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cedro.info; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5PjJp9YEghak6giNGc8fo+hAekQz5wQuI+G+9mjs8VM=; b=JAWkmycR0NbtwuTxwpxg4K7Eo4kt7MDEzs4qDuY4w8a+1cVtSXmyrA6VpV4GU8qSZ7 rGuQNc6veCQaRHFj66HNvHUcYHAHQe4I3y8SONVKNIqPWbV+gxyZHJBIeS/o8eooAEx9 yxkl+xvGjO0k2Tz85Fr9j67PFpN3WzRGv5YOuWmkGmOdHgQ+2sPYqDwNR7gXddLMpzGZ KmfwKCX+6JwhtivSsVkGyUUZB+8vJb2X6LpWfsZdGIN7iZ8Llsobfo7BslJLP8tjaCNd RuSAJqnmnStpOBTg5y201xph12LSqL4Sy6hpD/j0zeTFtDCjc2V2ZX0GOEH5WdHSnywr mPJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=5PjJp9YEghak6giNGc8fo+hAekQz5wQuI+G+9mjs8VM=; b=KpGjp2AVBXS/BBVXEa7bDeE451BYlerXqRxyFyyMlAgcb6gfpb/6ZC8e55xGZdaSsW g7BZjiI59KeIKKkP2Zznho0qHCTqaFWuxz/yHxy6eRlOZ0YKL2VsgmQHQg0WaIcW2O0v 8GApbuPXLQ2/BpjZjbqDO2UpyEKDOMvN3p4LbrAzldWhiTuIO735044JcDBazGK8zupP oLXQR79Tyjufoywec1GyVgXCNiBI/ZzuyMCXvDF+4tFM4stzP6B1u5oz1de0GcYOtqNB 3mHcVeGVXZ6jQo3dBxxkjxL/G4IIBtgB94l2zu3oIk5TIZ83hiZnkB/6oqqzY4hU5F9V ztpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYm2kZsQVt7+QsECQv0p57HYiqOcFvapM+dhEbDjtCVxxLE6Mr9 H4rQXmfiP/uM613lCUQ9fj0fUNsezf8R3fpoX0Dun1xeKkM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIqHl1V2nUmeV53jssT2MBObJK7rnul+591xA5+H0AIYrYP4RuvojdI4FDFEWI8A7soe3isBsKMTOXpPpdX9QQ= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe89:: with SMTP id l9mr14774717wrr.400.1589141802072; Sun, 10 May 2020 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tomasz CEDRO Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 22:16:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Firefox 76.0 videoconference problems To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49KwMJ4cLxz4bwx X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cedro.info header.s=google header.b=JAWkmycR; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tomek@cedro.info has no SPF policy when checking 2a00:1450:4864:20::42c) smtp.mailfrom=tomek@cedro.info X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.68 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cedro.info:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cedro.info]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cedro.info:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.38)[ip: (-9.13), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.29), asn: 15169(-0.43), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 20:16:46 -0000 On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:12 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > I can confirm this is the Firefox 76.0 problem. > > I have downgraded to firefox-75.0_2,1.txz (+icu-66.1,1.txz dependency) > and videoconferencing works fine. > > The problem is also 75 does not want to work with profile already > migrated to 76 so I am cut of either browser settings or > videofoncerencing. Smart move Firefox :\ > > Will report a bug of the port and to the mozilla. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246363 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1636781 If anyone could test and confirm that would be much appreciated :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info