Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:23:58 -0700 From: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun x2100 Server Compatability Message-ID: <20051205092358.2a3c806f.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <099752D0-4311-472F-9883-AB269B389277@khera.org> References: <437CF0E5.5030405@wmptl.com> <437D0FF6.20009@deadcafe.de> <1E1A2905-37CA-45BA-8E3E-BC3DDF3094EF@khera.org> <4384BBBF.4030007@wmptl.com> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0511251230470.28992@tea.blinkenlights.nl> <438844C2.3000902@bredband.net> <10F00268-9E17-4EAB-B806-D8666C50177D@khera.org> <099752D0-4311-472F-9883-AB269B389277@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:24:41 -0500 Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> wrote: > Sorta off-topic: > > Does anyone know about the rack rails for these systems (and/or the > X4100)? Sun claims "they only fit Sun racks" which seems idiotic to > me (Dell used to claim the same but their rails always fit standard > square-hole racks too). The local Sun reseller doesn't seem to want > to do any research for me or show me any samples. > > Anyone who knows please let me know. Thanks! Vivek: I don't know for sure but I have seen photos of a Wikimedia cluster (Amsterdam??) that used a bunch Sun servers. They had a bunch of high res pics. Don't recall seeing any Sun logos on the racks. Lemme see if I can find a link.... Hmm.. this is closet I can get right now: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Kennisnet/en>; Not what I was looking for. They a lot of high res pics of that cluster somewhere... -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051205092358.2a3c806f.kgunders>