From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 09:26:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1FD16A4BF; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDF243F75; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h84GQvnW000470; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h84GQveF000469; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:26:56 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20030904162656.GA396@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200309040429.h844TBhD058678@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030904083617.GA56261@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030904092755.GD45051@sunbay.com> <20030904140129.GA61909@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030904155659.GC97732@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030904155659.GC97732@sunbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.lib.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 16:26:58 -0000 On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:56:59PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:01:29AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:27:55PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > [...] > > > > GCC should have additional changes then. It is going to confuse other > > > > things to have the symlink in one directory and the real libs in another. > > > > > > > I will look into what else is needed in our toolchain to get rid of these > > > symlinks, and get back to you, David. > > > > Keep which ever symlinks you want /lib or /usr/lib -- but we should be > > totally unambigious as to which are the "real" ones, and don't install > > the other. Installing two sets of symlinks isn't the way to go. > > > Sure. The fix is to make ``cc --print-search-dirs'' output include > the /lib directory too. That is trival. > I'm currently testing some patches with bsd.lib.mk,v 1.152. We should all agree on where the symlink for things like libc.so.X live. I'm 99% sure Peter will argue /usr/lib, and I personally don't care -- I just want one of them. Before commiting yet something else to bsd.lib.mk, what direction are you going in?