Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:07:32 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> To: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: emacs-nox11 Message-ID: <4E2C1914.7000106@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <CADGWnjWqk_GV4EyAE77f6tpZSCUtvaX8YkeUNZV2KN4N0Cb%2BVQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4E2BF0BB.9040308@nagual.nl> <CADGWnjWqk_GV4EyAE77f6tpZSCUtvaX8YkeUNZV2KN4N0Cb%2BVQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op 24-7-2011 12:46 schreef C. P. Ghost: > Since there are no X11 libs in emacs despite all those options > being set anyway, I suppose that setting WITHOUT_X11 creates > a non-X11 emacs. > > I'm using the following port (normal emacs, with WITHOUT_X11 set): > > % echo /var/db/pkg/emacs* > /var/db/pkg/emacs-23.3_1,2 > > But I don't know if X dependencies are being pulled in when the > port is being built with all those options. Yes, but the latter is just what worries me. I want a console version of emacs. It's a server and I absolutely do not want any X dependencies cluttering my system. Ports are great but sometimes they have bitten me in this respect. Sure, I can do a dry run on a virtual freebsd machine, but that is not at all that fast. So I'm still looking for people who have done this ans _know_ it will work out OK.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E2C1914.7000106>