Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:07:54 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@kolobov.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED Message-ID: <20031217060754.GA714@chetwood.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031217022824.GA26180@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200312162127.hBGLRMUF039206@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031217022824.GA26180@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003-12-16 at 18:28 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:27:22PM -0800, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > > sergei 2003/12/16 13:27:22 PST > >=20 > > FreeBSD ports repository > >=20 > > Modified files: > > . MOVED=20 > > Log: > > - Document renaming mail/mailscanner to mail/MailScanner >=20 > This seems to contravene the port naming style rules in the porter's > handbook. I have mixed feelings about this myself, however: - the software refers to itself as "MailScanner", in Perl module name, all paths and filenames - I suggested to the maintainer that PORTNAME should be changed to MailScanner, in order to make the paths and names consistent with the software's own naming scheme - Now, when the PORTNAME has changed, it would be inconsistent, IMHO, to have PORTNAME=3DMailScanner and the directory mail/mailscanner. Thus the request for repo-copy. Having said that, if the consensus is against this change, I will back it out. Sergei --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/3/K6FOxuaTulNAERAgQvAJ9vZyaft/Zu4cMoW30bnCqOSjv5JACgkOwL KWjf3kwUaX3AYqu47uXnmvM= =GSXe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217060754.GA714>