Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:39:36 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Juris Kaminskis <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: [Bug 162859] [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmokhyssvwz%2BbQ479Vv3mCc2qnfrxHSeGhdhrCAsJGHaXLg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKJAkzvHswrDO1YtSOxO0qfXJJWsVfu_vOsB_G2LPYJmp_nuqw@mail.gmail.com> References: <bug-162859-13733@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-162859-13733-wjrXNSa1SW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <20150104234107.Q82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAKJAkzuZQJm3T1v3FPXJxrRBZBROamMogDmTBBPGKMs6sr%2B2Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKJAkzvHswrDO1YtSOxO0qfXJJWsVfu_vOsB_G2LPYJmp_nuqw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hm, +jkim. Any ideas? On 7 January 2015 at 10:23, Juris Kaminskis <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-01-05 17:27 GMT+02:00 Juris Kaminskis <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com>: > >> >> 2015-01-04 15:17 GMT+02:00 Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>: >> > >> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: >> > >> > Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but >> > I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. >> > >> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 >> > > >> > > --- Comment #14 from juris <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> --- >> > > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. >> > >> > If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP >> > laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete >> > after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. >> > >> > So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? >> >> I have compiled head branch revision 216941 and battery status via >> acpiconf works. When compiling from source revision 216942 acpiconf stops >> responding. I also tried to remove r216942 and compiled from source release >> 9.3, but there battery status was not working. Apparently there are more >> things than just one that breaks HP ACPI . >> > > Sorry for my previous email that was confusing. I did not revert r216941 > when compiled release 9.3. So when I did that, battery status works. I also > compiled release 10.1 with excluding r216942, and battery status works. So > this single change for some reason creates problem for HP laptops. > >> > >> > >> > If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: >> > >> > a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which >> > might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? >> > >> > b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a >> > reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? >> > >> > c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) >> > >> > cheers, Ian >> >> On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: >> >> Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but >> I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. >> >> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 >> > >> > --- Comment #14 from juris <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> --- >> > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. >> >> If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP >> laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete >> after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. >> >> So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? >> >> If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: >> >> a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which >> might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? >> >> b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a >> reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? >> >> c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) >> >> cheers, Ian >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmokhyssvwz%2BbQ479Vv3mCc2qnfrxHSeGhdhrCAsJGHaXLg>