From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 23:01:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB90037B401 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out004.verizon.net (out004pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC7C43FA3 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:01:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: from kokeb.ambesa.net ([138.88.7.75]) by out004.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030427060142.JOJH28930.out004.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net>; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 01:01:42 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 02:01:41 -0400 From: Mike Makonnen To: FreeBSD-rc@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <20030427005543.GA96834@BSDWins.Com> References: <20030426154030.M13476@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030427005543.GA96834@BSDWins.Com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out004.verizon.net from [138.88.7.75] at Sun, 27 Apr 2003 01:01:41 -0500 Message-Id: <20030427060142.JOJH28930.out004.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> cc: freebsd-rc@yahoogroups.com cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-rc] Re: RFC: Removal of the old rc system from -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 06:01:44 -0000 On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:55:43 -0400 John De Boskey wrote: > > I am all for rcNG, with many thanks to those involved. > > I did notice something the other day, though, that I have a > question about. What is the status of /etc/netstart? Are there > plans to upgrade it to be aware of rcNG? > > Comments? We should have functionality equivalent to it by 5.2. I don't think that it should be a requirement to meet before removing rcOG, though. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - The Power To Serve