From owner-cvs-all Tue Nov 27 8:17:36 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (gw.Awfulhak.org [217.204.245.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8080037B405; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:17:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org [fec0::1:12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fARGHQR55600; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:17:26 GMT (envelope-from brian@freebsd-services.com) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fARGHP300987; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:17:25 GMT (envelope-from brian@freebsd-services.com) Message-Id: <200111271617.fARGHP300987@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Robert Watson Cc: Brian Somers , Gregory Neil Shapiro , Mike Silbersack , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, brian@freebsd-services.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc security In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Watson of "Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:14:46 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:17:25 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Brian Somers wrote: > > > > silby> Do you want me to commit this, or should I wait until you get a > > > silby> chance to test it yourself? > > > > > > It's tested. > > > > It doesn't look like it handles > > > > daily_status_security_output="user1 user2" > > I wondered about that also, but it looks like we already have some code > that doesn't correctly handle that scenario: > > case "${daily_status_security_output:=root}" in > /*) > echo " (output logged separately)" > sh /etc/security -s $args \ > >$daily_status_security_output 2>&1;; > *) > echo " (output mailed separately)" > sh /etc/security $args 2>&1 | > sendmail $daily_status_security_output;; > esac;; > > Semantics involving multiple mail destinations make sense, but not for > files, so if we tweak the := above, it might be possible to make it all > make sense. I don't think I follow. How do you think the := needs tweaking ? The above was intended to deal with single files and multiple email addresses and still seems to.... > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project > robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services -- Brian http://www.freebsd-services.com/ Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message