Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Jul 1999 11:54:03 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), nate@mt.sri.com, scheper@beast.toad.net, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SMP + XDM = keyboard lockup 
Message-ID:  <199907221854.LAA01328@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:53:05 -0000." <199907221853.LAA10953@usr05.primenet.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > Why would the other CPU doing the same inb/outb's as X?  By the time
> > > > init is run, the kernel is done 'setting up' the kernel.
> > > 
> > > It wouldn't be.
> > > 
> > > It would merely be trying to latch different addresses on the I/O
> > > bus and/or write data to the previously latched address, at the
> > > same time.
> > 
> > This comment demonstrates that you're out of your depth.  Back to the 
> > other end of the pool, and take your squeaky toys with you...
> > 
> > (It doesn't work like that.)
> 
> Cool.  So we don't need the BGL for interrupt processing...

At the moment we do, but with finer-grained locking on a few things, no.

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  msmith@cdrom.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907221854.LAA01328>