Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:34:26 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Gustau P?rez <gperez@entel.upc.edu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d script to load kernel modules Message-ID: <BANLkTincRhq3GwKA7ESAo503FEG3_FQtjA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110612192440.GB37735@in-addr.com> References: <4DF3E98B.40108@FreeBSD.org> <20110612085649.GA11503@DataIX.net> <4DF49181.1000007@entel.upc.edu> <20110612185631.GA15184@DataIX.net> <20110612192440.GB37735@in-addr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:56:31PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>> So technically here a ZFS only install is lacking the speed in which
>> modules are loaded. I would prefer to find out why and fix that before
>> we go about adding new functionality to rcNG.
>
> As I believe Doug has already said, its not just loading modules from ZFS=
.
> In my experience, loading modules via loader.conf from UFS on i386 is
> significantly slower than once the kernel has booted on both of my system=
s
> here. =A0I think I've tried it and its not a disk thing as its slow loadi=
ng from
> flash media also.
Dumb questions:
1. Has anyone benchmarked the two methods in parallel? If so
what's the delta?
2. Has anyone tried to determine why it is that way?
Thanks,
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTincRhq3GwKA7ESAo503FEG3_FQtjA>