From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  3 04:49:21 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5F0D837B401; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 04:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from perrin.int.nxad.com (internal.ext.nxad.com [69.1.70.251])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D6B2843FA3; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 04:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from hmp@nxad.com)
Received: by perrin.int.nxad.com (Postfix, from userid 1072)
	id 424902105A; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 04:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:49:20 -0700
From: Hiten Pandya <hmp@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: SUZUKI Shinsuke <suz@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20030603114920.GB63271@perrin.int.nxad.com>
References: <200306011400.h51E0E2X053391@fledge.watson.org>
	<x7k7c31rz0.wl%suz@crl.hitachi.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <x7k7c31rz0.wl%suz@crl.hitachi.co.jp>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: re@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 11:49:21 -0000

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:32:35PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> I discussed this issued within KAME.
> 
> Here's our rough plan about this synchronization.
> 
> If you have some opinion, please let me know.
> When I've finished each merge, I'll ask you how to proceed.
> 
> 
> - sync per feature; don't do a complete sync with the KAME-snap:
> 	Since some of the KAME-specific features are still under
> 	standardization or immature, it's dangerous to sync without
> 	much consideration.

	For what its worth, I have some of this stuff already merged in
	my local cvs tree.  Drop me note if I can be of any help.  I
	have the IGMPv3 code in my repo merged.

	Cheers.

		-- Hiten <hmp@FreeBSD.ORG>