From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Dec 16 08:05:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3166C82284 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 08:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 704791BD9; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 08:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6C021AAF07A; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:05:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, marino@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List , wblock@wonkity.com References: <3959e18e-5819-b2c5-69a9-c71ce1282383@marino.st> <3cf805df-eb25-187c-8bf9-b6c2be5e977d@marino.st> <3daf4aea-82ea-de8f-86d8-5c3b19a1f8a3@marino.st> <5852D631.4090208@quip.cz> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <3ff99214-41f0-b34b-a343-63e1671d4b16@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:05:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5852D631.4090208@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 08:05:38 -0000 On 15.12.2016 18:43, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > John Marino wrote on 2016/12/15 17:46: > >> [1] I've got it on my todo list to provide a new method that would >> eliminate the "my builder just rebuilt 150 packages, but pkg(8) only >> upgraded 2 packages" issue that some users don't want to see. It's a >> lot more complicated than the conservative yet bulletproof approach >> currently used by poudriere and synth. > > This is interesting case - we are running own Poudriere repo and I am > fine with it. But I am a bit nervous when I know 150 packages was > rebuilt and just 2 upgraded by pkg. In this case I want pkg to update > (reinstall) all of them. > If something changed so that 150 packages must be rebuilt why pkg > doesn't reinstall them? Isn't it the possible place for problems after > upgrade? Not really. I found the following explanation from babt about this behavior: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-January/097569.html Since its from last year, it is maybe outdated. But if this issue still stands, its worth addressing it. Greetings, Torsten