Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:55:23 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP Message-ID: <20050416205523.GE784@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <86ll7i30mc.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org> <86ll7i30mc.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:52:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> writes: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > > > While there I would also remove everything from netnatm that is > > > not needed by NgATM. This is mainly the socket interface. I'm not > > > aware of any application that uses it. Any thoughts on this? > > Oh. Don't remove that. Userland PPP needs it. People who are using > > ADSL modems of any kind will still need it. >=20 > Uh? PPP uses netgraph, which has its own socket thingy. Fraid not. If you look at the source for ppp you will clearly see that it opens an AF_NATM socket. %%% empiric:/usr/src/usr.sbin/ppp % grep NATM * atm.c: sock.snatm_family =3D AF_NATM; atm.c: p->fd =3D socket(PF_NATM, SOCK_DGRAM, PROTO_NATMAAL5); %%% BMS --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: '' iD8DBQFCYXu7ueUpAYYNtTsRAn+jAJ9X8R1uYg9Ws+Qnpvsq5XWwlWSPrwCaAgil MbxJ11JpVqf/J9av8ydnagg= =TSmt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050416205523.GE784>