Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:37:16 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: deischen@freebsd.org, des@des.no, Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: When will bsnmp stop breaking -current builds Message-ID: <20060309133716.GA1877@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060309132839.GA46241@ip.net.ua> References: <20060309092303.W10582@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20060308085714.L10582@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86bqwh59gn.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060308152413.GA43764@flame.pc> <20060308.115539.98861830.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060308192657.GA54826@ip.net.ua> <20060308200214.GA63755@flame.pc> <20060309081544.GD54826@ip.net.ua> <20060309125632.GA1677@flame.pc> <20060309132839.GA46241@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-03-09 15:28, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote: >On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:56:33PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Do you think we also need to merge this to RELENG_6 and RELENG_5 some >> time later, to allow upgrades from those branches to the HEAD of >> CURRENT? > > No, such upgrades use HEAD sources, including fixed Makefile.inc1. Ah, yes of course. I didn't think of that :) > Unless a similar problem existed in RELENG_[56] of course... No, no problem in RELENG_x branches. Thanks for the help once again, Ruslan :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060309133716.GA1877>