From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 11 13:47:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9882A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:47:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ucu-98.ucu.ac.ug (ucu-98.ucu.ac.ug [193.108.254.98])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691EB43D39
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:47:20 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from pokui@psg.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost)
	by pokui-favour.ucu.ac.ug with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1CRw9n-00019e-2X; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:21:19 +0300
From: Patrick Okui <pokui@psg.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:21:18 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <2627048885E8BF7F8DCDCFD2@jesk.int.de.clara.net>
In-Reply-To: <2627048885E8BF7F8DCDCFD2@jesk.int.de.clara.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411102021.18553.pokui@psg.com>
cc: Christian Meutes <christian.meutes@de.clara.net>
Subject: Re: Pam Authorization Problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:47:21 -0000

On Wednesday 10 November 2004 20:13, Christian Meutes wrote:
> I recognized a strange behavior of PAM. My Plan was to do Authorization
> through pam_unix.so and pam_ldap.so
> I have the following configuration for this:
> ---
> account         required        pam_login_access.so
> account         sufficient        /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so
> account         required        pam_unix.so
> ---
>
> when the user neither exist in ldap nor in /etc/passwd then the
> auhtorization is nevertheless successful... this behavior isnt what i

huh? as in a user that more or less does *not* exist on your system can log 
in? do you have any other authentication modules that the system falls to?

> expected.
>
> i want to do authorization through pam_ldap.so and pam_unix.so
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"