From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon Mar 1 2:19:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from foobar.franken.de (foobar.franken.de [194.94.249.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B6D152ED for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 02:19:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from logix@foobar.franken.de) Received: (from logix@localhost) by foobar.franken.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) id LAA20769; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:17:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <19990301111751.A20739@foobar.franken.de> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:17:51 +0100 From: Harold Gutch To: "Robert A. Bruce" Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The Linux PR firestorm disaster (w.r.t. FreeBSD) References: <19990301040425.B19859@foobar.franken.de> <199903010640.WAA28915@pike.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199903010640.WAA28915@pike.cdrom.com>; from Robert A. Bruce on Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 10:40:12PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 10:40:12PM -0800, Robert A. Bruce wrote: > >> 5. Linux has a lot more native commercial applications. > >> > >Which run faster under FreeBSD's Linux-emulation :). > > Which applications run faster on FreeBSD? How much faster? > Where is this published or how is it replicated? > *shrug* unfortunately this is merely based on somewhat personal experiance and reports of people I know, partially *BSD-users, partially Linux-users. I heard comments like "FreeBSD's scheduler is better, that's the reason for this", but I unfortunately have no publications or so to base my claims on. bye, Harold -- Sleep is an abstinence syndrome wich occurs due to lack of caffein. Wed Mar 4 04:53:33 CET 1998 #unix, ircnet To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message