Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:15:46 +0300 From: Daniel Corbe <corbe@corbe.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BETA4: fortune -o gone? Message-ID: <xon1u1rw1lp.fsf@desktop.hga1.somcable.com> In-Reply-To: <20131205.083242.74676021.sthaug@nethelp.no> (sthaug@nethelp.no's message of "Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:32:42 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <20131205010722.GE44739@glenbarber.us> <020c58348f43c35da047761d0be6a9f4.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20131205152006.27766c1f@X220.ovitrap.com> <20131205.083242.74676021.sthaug@nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sthaug@nethelp.no writes: >> > Nobody likes a good BikeShed. But _really_? >> > Is FreeBSD going "PC" (Politically Correct)? >> > Looks like a sign of weakness. :( >> >> a sign? It is a weakness. FreeBSD did not force anybody to use fortune >> with the -o option. It was also possible to delete the 'offensive' >> files. > > I see absolutely no reason why fortune -o should be removed. I suggest > that it should be restored. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no This thread is entirely too long for the subject matter of having removed a bunch of random files from the sunday comics section of the file system that were of little use to anyone outside of "EDGY == OFFENSIVE" crowd. Shine on, you crazy diamonds. And don't ever let "the man" keep you down.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xon1u1rw1lp.fsf>