Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 17:52:54 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_input.c Message-ID: <463DF9D6.4000004@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070506162919.G24765@fledge.watson.org> References: <200705061516.l46FG6we030349@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070506162919.G24765@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sun, 6 May 2007, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> andre 2007-05-06 15:16:06 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/netinet tcp_input.c >> Log: >> Remove the defunct remains of the TCPS_TIME_WAIT cases from >> tcp_do_segment >> and change it to a void function. >> >> We use a compressed structure for TCPS_TIME_WAIT to save memory. Any >> late >> late segments arriving for such a connection is handled directly in >> the TW >> code. > > Since tcp_subr.c is such a catch-all, and quite long, I've was thinking > last night that we might want to move the tcp_tw* functions (and related > bits) into tcp_timewait.c. It could be that if we do that, since it > will be 99% post-Berkeley code, that we want to apply the > copyright/license from tcp_syncache.c, as jlemon did the timewait code > under the same contract as the syncache/syncookie work, but we should > check with him. Good idea. Will you check with him or shall I? -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?463DF9D6.4000004>