From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Dec 31 11:20:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8A21561B for ; Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:20:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:20:35 -0800 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Brad Knowles" , Cc: Subject: RE: Temperature Findings Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:20:35 -0800 Message-ID: <000101bf53c4$1cf9c690$021d85d1@youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > At 10:27 PM -0800 1999/12/30, Mike Smith wrote: > > > The difference has already been explained as a different > instruction mix. > > This should be obvious to anyone that has been in the industry for as > > long as you have. > > It seems to me that you guys are all talking past each other: > > 1. He's mentioned that he runs the same instruction mix > (i.e., two seti@home clients) under both Linux and FreeBSD Yes, Linux before he overclocked and overvoltaged and FreeBSD before. > 2. He's mentioned that he's run FreeBSD in both > uniprocessor > and SMP modes Yes, UP uses HLT, SMP doesn't. With FreeBSD's SMP kernel, both processors are always running full bore. > 3. He's mentioned that he's run FreeBSD SMP with > 3.3 without problems Before he overclocked and overvoltaged. Possibly also before his fan's capacity decreased due to bearing failure or similar. > 4. He's mentioned that the overclocking is a recent > introduction to the issue and the system was overheating before then So he has cooling problems even at normal CPU voltages and frequencies. Obviously, he either has inadequate cooling or he has some defective component in his system that is creating too much heat. > 5. He's also mentioned that this is a chipset which we now > know is not directly supported by the measurement interface, and > therefore the temperature multiples might (or might not) be off Okay, so we can't even trust his data as correctly indicating a temperature problems. So, perhaps we know nothing at all. [snip] > Of course, the fact that everyone is talking past each other is > not surprising, seeing as many of the correspondents are spread > around the globe. There's nothing to explain or analyze. Much of his data comes from unsupported (and unsupportable) configurations. > If I might make a suggestion based on my own recent introduction > to this mailing list -- it really helps if the new poster provides as > much detail as possible and doesn't make any assumptions about how > much they know about the problem based on their decade-plus (or more) > experience, and it really helps if the other people involved give the > guy at least half a break while he tries to explain what weirdo > whacked out thing he's seeing. Seeing an overclocked, overvoltaged SMP system overheat is not exactly weird or whacked out. It's specifically the reason most people do not recommend overclocking or overvoltaging. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message