Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 06:53:47 +0200 From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error on fvwm startup on 9.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <JRxlLn62yJ@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: </bV0nNnx%2Bt@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <201305150023.r4F0MwVw046360@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hallo Julian H. Stacey, > Nor me either, I tried all this to narrow it down: > { > I tried fvwm -debug & ls -ltr /var/log > & tinkering with original RC file, & patching out bits of system.fvwmrc, > assuming something failing around It fails even with a very plain setup. > but no luck, I didn't persevere, as I noted: > cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/fvwm/files/ ; /bin/ls -1 | wc -l # 41 > cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/fvwm2/files/ ; /bin/ls -1 | wc -l # 2 > so wondered if you'd had problems feeding back to fvwm.org, & if I should > just move to fvwm2 & customise from there ? > > The buildlog doesn't differ enought. > Differ from what ? another earlier that works ? Buildlog on 8.3 (working) and 9.1 > The amd64 laptop I'm testing on has 3 boot partitions with 9.1-RELEASE, > 9.0-RELEASE & 8.3-RELEASE I just re-installed Version 1.24r on all > 3, & starting with both default /usr/local/lib/X11/fvwm/system.fvwmrc & > my customised system.fvwmrc, I am seeing the same problem on all 6 > combinations of 3 x OS-version x 2 x RC files : It may be a regression in some depedency ? USE_XORG= xbitmaps xpm xext x11 xmu As I don't have a problem on my FreeBSD 8.3 box with older X. > I took a quick look at various bits of http://fvwm.org/ > Should we ask there ? Or would answer just be "Try 2.x" Yes, 1.x ist "not supported" for some long time. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?JRxlLn62yJ>