From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 20:24:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BC216A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:24:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jiashiun@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463F143D54 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jiashiun@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so2452800rng for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:24:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=H0CgI3ws+8NWR78Uqr9t8JHka4mjO1njMu9tKeClrnFOFkVVsNKdpI3E2uaLMdlhZBkDd5QGk7Liyy6rLwNuJTT0i4h0uanD/DwP4iBsbSnHT8LlQ9+Rfegxnm5cjrC/pmCVjXEw8vgrUycq8t03OKn55n3ZTf2J2O29jWEa0wM= Received: by 10.38.161.27 with SMTP id j27mr94180rne; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.12.29 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1d6d20bc050601132457a7904a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 04:24:22 +0800 From: Jia-Shiun Li To: Jiawei Ye In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050505101016.GM75629@cicely12.cicely.de> <20050505110109.GN75629@cicely12.cicely.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: SMBus hardware note recognized X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jia-Shiun Li List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:24:26 -0000 On 5/5/05, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On 5/5/05, Bernd Walter wrote: > > Maybe the chip ID isn't known by the ichsmb driver. > > It could be just adding the ID, but the chip may as well be > > incompatible. > > > > -- > > B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de > > bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de > Well, that's why I asked in the first place though :( >=20 Your ICH4 SMBus controller should have been supported by ichsmb. Strange. Try boot verbose and examine the boot messages carefully.