From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 19:41:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D30106566C for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CE58FC14 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so3218156wwc.31 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ikvTLuJ9Dhj+7h9crciN1mKVc9r2kWFkIiws6UjXCss=; b=qayj+PVWrCkAUGk6IfWC5L6XXezvKv/FF0cN5q1hUksjTvTSYQCSWN1gf9jKkwtQWQ eroyw8FpTQ77cC/AOSLumAmL5BjauUiMuytjD2SfVZzvepzYInJJKeIVROL390epKENG gBQ/wo6t8hwecGtY5e5TZqmTgdkhfV6ijBNEs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JReQGfuYwx2RJwX+/Oan2WSWdXq8a8365X1LH+ER+4+36BFuKI4y0Tiw9BvGxjFecy j59Bc3QyNETlGvDXF4X56bP1C+Ecu+i0HKmoWtGthLq0EreUjt8ldzQ4qjG2eqNWbv07 056ivf0oBwcNxuqPzkkb9MqJi7NEeUxHkoQis= Received: by 10.217.7.71 with SMTP id z49mr8592790wes.33.1304019663095; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.243.143 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:40:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:40:33 +0100 Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:41:04 -0000 On 28 April 2011 20:23, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 28 Apr 2011 20:08, "Chip Camden" wrote: >> >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit >> privilege for all ports. =A0What if certain qualified port maintainers w= ho >> aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the lea= f >> ports that they maintain? =A0Wouldn't that speed up the overall process? >> > > Search the archives for an answer or ten. > Sorry for the terse response, touchscreen phones are horrible to email on. I've found one of the conversations I was thinking of [1] -- these often come up. It should probably be on some kind of FAQ list... Chris [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg28399.html