Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:20:44 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Gilbert Cao <hika@bsdmon.com> Subject: Re: Kernel panic with pf Message-ID: <200410251421.05186.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20041025120321.GA3425@bsdmon.com> References: <20041024144754.GA1670@bsdmon.com> <200410242127.53782.max@love2party.net> <20041025120321.GA3425@bsdmon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1633228.Z4P7gAXhVn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 25 October 2004 14:03, Gilbert Cao wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 09:27:46PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > Thanks. Going to commit it. > > > > > Should I also test with debug.mpsafenet=3D0, or is it useless ? > > > > You should not use user/group rules in a debug.mpsafenet=3D1 environmen= t. > > It will cause hard lockups and the like. The fix for these lockups is > > non- trivial and will take some more time. > > Yeah, I mean debug.mpsafenet=3D1 ... sorry for anyone who have > misunderstand what I said about testing with debug.mpsafenet=3D0 ... Oh nevermind! Thank you a lot for your report and testing. I was just tryin= g=20 to make this point clear. I am very unhappy with the situation, but I can't= =20 help it and hence try to educate users to not fall into that trap. Thanks again. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1633228.Z4P7gAXhVn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBfO+xXyyEoT62BG0RAgaoAJ9lV5LhSFjOe7J78QZ0Emj3CeajrACggfUG DwbWAzhFM5NL0Mtsyw8ugWo= =1Df9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1633228.Z4P7gAXhVn--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410251421.05186.max>