From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 28 07:29:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E23106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:29:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1844F8FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3S7TVGH009438;
	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:29:31 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q3S7TVAp009435; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:29:31 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:29:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120426190304.0ec3330f@gumby.homeunix.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204280928440.9361@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <loom.20120425T142751-217@post.gmane.org>
	<2FCC4ECF-DAC2-4701-B392-B0415528A4C7@mac.com>
	<loom.20120425T202502-789@post.gmane.org>
	<loom.20120426T065807-118@post.gmane.org>
	<CA+tpaK2JQ3ZkmXZK4v_j4nwssBrz9Hj69kV5=tkmyUxaHGaksg@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20120426T095813-923@post.gmane.org>
	<20120426190304.0ec3330f@gumby.homeunix.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:29:31 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:29:33 -0000

> is relatively new. My guess is that if there is a problem it's ZFS
> specific. If it were a more general problem I think we'd see a lot more
> complaints, whereas  ZFS already has a reputation for needing lots of
> memory.
you may precisely set up a limits of memory that ZFS would use at most. or 
just don't use it which i do.