From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 17:03:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0099D16A420; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D12043D5A; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016011A3C28; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D8345152B; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:03:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:03:19 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20060215170319.GA50425@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060214112901.A74586@xorpc.icir.org> <43F2884E.1070006@FreeBSD.org> <20060214230933.B81035@xorpc.icir.org> <43F354AD.8030403@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F354AD.8030403@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo Subject: Re: please check your ports, pre-install vs pre-su-install X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:03:22 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:19:57AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: >=20 > > or that you consider the two targets redundant and just default > > to one (pre-install with additional credential switch) should be enough= ? >=20 > Yes. I think ports should handle this transparently, without the port aut= hor > having to do multiple target gymnastics. If you want this, you'll have to provide patches and a migration plan. Kris --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD817XWry0BWjoQKURArkrAJ9cRSywenum+v+LO+cQ4MMXeX8neACgtZ+j MMkUB3/F6xkHqWYz2IsXhTc= =gbaF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--