From owner-freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Fri Apr 1 18:33:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43E5B00914 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53E810DA for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u31IXxj7027373 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:33:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204426] Processes terminating cannot access memory Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:33:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kib@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:34:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204426 --- Comment #87 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #84) Thank you for the pointer, it is something for me to keep in mind. But I do not see how would it be directly related. OBJT_DEAD and OBJ_DEAD a= re two different things. In the other PR debugging data, the OBJ_DEAD flag is set, but the object itself is fine and not obliterated. Previous debugging patch results make me confident that the OBJ_DEAD flag was not set with vm_object_set_flags(), while source code only sets the OBJ_DEAD with the ca= lls of that helper. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=