Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:44:43 -0500 From: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@iteration.net> To: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> Cc: Matthew Rogers <matt@accelnet.net>, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU affinity hinting Message-ID: <20010629214443.A69846@peorth.iteration.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0106292104270.14702-100000@www.everquick.net>; from eddy%2Bpublic%2Bspam@noc.everquick.net on Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:14:06PM %2B0000 References: <002001c100d8$2c406c40$a2962640@bear> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0106292104270.14702-100000@www.everquick.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:14:06PM +0000, E.B. Dreger scribbled: | > Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:14:58 -0700 | > From: Matthew Rogers <matt@accelnet.net> The issue is a lot more complicated than what you think. This actually is a big issue in our future SMP implementation. There are two types of processor affinity: user-configurable and system automated. We have no implementation of the former, and alfred-vm has a semblance of the latter. Please wait patiently..... Michael -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@iteration.net | keichii@freebsd.org | | http://iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010629214443.A69846>