From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 30 19:19: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C68737B400 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 19:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8E062D1B; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 19:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 19:21:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist To: David Schultz Cc: Rohit Grover , Subject: VM Question (was Re: larger kernel virtual address space) In-Reply-To: <20020430040314.A11282@HAL9000.wox.org> Message-ID: <20020430191838.D4789-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does the FreeBSD VM system do O(1) or O(N) searches for gaps in a processes virtual memory space? (It may not seem obvious why my question is related to the discussion below, but trust me, it is...) On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Rohit Grover : > > I apologize for not checking the FAQs before asking the question. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/advanced.html#CHANGE-KERNEL-ADDRESS-SPACE > > > > How large can we make the KVA? > > This was recently discussed in the thread ``FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE not > easily scalable to large servers ... ?'' on the stable and current > lists; you'll probably find the information you want in the archives. > The short answer is that KVA + UVA <= 4 GB on x86. So you could raise > KVA to 3 GB, for instance, but then any given user process would only > be able to address 1 GB of virtual memory. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message