Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:28:51 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hi Message-ID: <873ae4k798.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20090223195200.GD58188@kokopelli.hydra> (Chad Perrin's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:52:00 -0700") References: <9ef7e7380902220154t74657d52uc9497c77672b79f8@mail.gmail.com> <9a52b1190902220711u65e38320t97ca56547bef246d@mail.gmail.com> <87ljryccm0.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20090223081921.V71718@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87prh9ku9g.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20090223195200.GD58188@kokopelli.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:52:00 -0700, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote: >On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:11:55PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:19:30 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: >>> alpine works fine >> >> I know. That's why I am not in favor of maintaining pine4 *in* the >> Ports tree. If someone wants to blow their foot off, however, then >> it's fine with me, as long as they know what they are doing when they >> point the "cvs update" gun backwards in time :) > > Wait -- what? Keeping it out of the core isn't good enough . . . ? I'm sorry Chad. I lost you there. What 'core' are we talking about?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?873ae4k798.fsf>