From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Tue Jan 17 21:27:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3011CB5491; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebi.us (glebi.us [96.95.210.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cell.glebi.us", Issuer "cell.glebi.us" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A66C1BE9; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebi.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebi.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v0HLREnW052299 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:27:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebi.us (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v0HLRE6M052298; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:27:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebi.us: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:27:14 -0800 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r312296 - in head: lib/libc/sys sys/kern sys/netinet sys/netinet6 sys/sys tools/regression/sockets/udp_pingpong tools/regression/sockets/unix_cmsg Message-ID: <20170117212713.GZ2611@FreeBSD.org> References: <201701161746.v0GHkcPX071529@repo.freebsd.org> <20170117065231.GW2611@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:27:15 -0000 On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:40:50AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: M> That being said, is there any other socket option value in there M> implemented as enum? I don't see anything obvious, so that I am curious if M> it would stick out as an odd one in there. What do you think? Simply because 30 years ago the language didn't allow that, and later additions mimiced the older sockopts. We need to break this loop :) -- Totus tuus, Glebius.