From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 18:49:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C4A16A4CE; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:49:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E8D43F85; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:49:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from dougb.net ([24.6.53.79]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20031202024913012002vv34e>; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 02:49:14 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:49:12 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= In-Reply-To: <20031202013251.GB14409@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20031201184721.N97771@qbhto.arg> References: <20031201160224.W97771@qbhto.arg> <20031202013251.GB14409@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Latitude D[568]00's? X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:49:15 -0000 Thanks for your very helpful response... pardon a few questions. On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Stefan Eßer wrote: > On 2003-12-01 16:09 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > Just when I thought the laptop issue was resolved, I've got some new > > drama. :) I am moving to a new job, and they use Dell Latitude's there, > > so I need to find out if anyone has experience with either the Latitude > > D500, D600, or D800. I'm particularly interested in ACPI support in > > -current, and things like suspend, resume, etc. I'm also interested in > > I have not got suspend/resume to work on my D800 (but perhaps have > just not tried enough). Everything else works just fine (X11, sound, > LAN, ...). Have you tried other ACPI features, like the battery monitor for example? Also, are you running -current? > The Bluetooth chip is not detected, though. Hrrmm... that's not good news. Do you have the bluetooth code in your kernel? (sorry for the silly question) Thanks for your thorough analysis of the 800 vs. 600, very helpful! Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection