From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 06:02:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950EB1065670 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 06:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA538FC0C for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 06:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so4618519yen.13 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lrgY7HeFPYXGLkbm4WWX2cIPm6HOrWtvVbgksKnJVIQ=; b=gk5XRlfhfvZF9CUYIbtXElhOd9dKCRMQQ4UI63P0BtFaM8tvkxv181VgA2gGeG2kJE TTxIfYHJeR0+1D+lx6raC5DhYLaDyJJvW2SLinRcNllFhGBo53TcvvcMBglczk8DVHM3 ujdiQuHz8IIqEjKicS/ZYe1s6rDkwODRU5M6j0nH4XRbWryEd5313T9H7X5W0AbNlkuy r7YFZSZVXZdpEfnBqbYkkSkcC5XJVlAdmxIVSgwJme1Ihl0eZUFwsZrr7qM+e6orR6+M mV+MDCwX3KMCL2AFVTt0JeqKYut6C3uad029sm6rumuV6iSMeJ8RBZVGrDw37A+8NPoh 5ISA== Received: by 10.42.202.80 with SMTP id fd16mr690199icb.6.1336888978415; Sat, 12 May 2012 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (c-98-212-197-29.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.212.197.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pa6sm12762196igc.12.2012.05.12.23.02.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 May 2012 23:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FAF4E79.8070600@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:02:33 -0500 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120512190132.GA1361@tiny> In-Reply-To: <20120512190132.GA1361@tiny> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Sony ebook reader with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 06:02:59 -0000 Almost every tablet runs ARM, and the "chipset" isn't standardized as much as x86. I haven't heard of a tablet running FreeBSD, but it would likely require corporate support just to access the documents for the chips. Even Android uses closed binaries for a lot of the core features. On 5/12/2012 2:01 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > It seems that the Sony ebook readers internaly run some kind of Linux > (MontaVista Linux). I heared someone saying that there are images for > eeprom out there to get access to the Linux system itself. Is there any > work in progress to install FreeBSD on this (or any other ebook reader). > > They have a real nice greyscale display of 600x800 to read epub or PDF, > even in daylight sun, and as they now also have Wifi on board, it would > be nice to combine this with access to mail by some alpha MUA, for > example mutt... > > Thanks > > matthias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 12:56:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A43106564A for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 12:56:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21278FC0C for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 12:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B61B508CB for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 14:55:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.41] (zeus.webrz.net [10.10.10.41]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5302B508C9 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 14:55:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FAFAF7F.4010409@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 14:56:31 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Cc: Subject: CSH prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 12:56:34 -0000 In cshell I use this prompt: set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[%/]> " The problem I face now is that if I use this prompt with symbolic links, the presented location is displaying the symbolic link rather than the real directory name. Is there a way of preventin this? thanks, Jos Chrispijn -- Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 13:25:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D721C106566C for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 13:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975098FC1D for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 13:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E77927FC6; Sun, 13 May 2012 15:25:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4DDP9NH003235; Sun, 13 May 2012 15:25:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 15:25:09 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Jos Chrispijn Message-Id: <20120513152509.09dbfc10.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4FAFAF7F.4010409@webrz.net> References: <4FAFAF7F.4010409@webrz.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CSH prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 13:25:18 -0000 On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:56:31 +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > In cshell I use this prompt: set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[%/]> " > The problem I face now is that if I use this prompt with symbolic links, > the presented location is displaying the symbolic link rather than the > real directory name. > Is there a way of preventin this? Yes, a very ugly way which I just found out: alias precmd 'set WD=`pwd`; set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[$WD]> "' Example: [3:21pm] r56[/]> cd /sys [3:21pm] r56[/usr/src/sys]> _ It redefines the whole prompt at any command that could affect the current working directory (not only "cd" can do that). This is needed as any call to `pwd` stored into a variable will only affect $prompt once - this is when it's set, only at this time $WD would be evaluated. So that's why this strange command. :-) Oh, and I just improved it. How about this? alias precmd 'set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[`pwd`]> "' Much better. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 13:46:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4704A106564A; Sun, 13 May 2012 13:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DA88FC15; Sun, 13 May 2012 13:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj8 with SMTP id hj8so738879wib.13 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 06:46:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=MqfdIBnLLrfLsupbliIfFS+G+0xwOOTsVVH5UQmF8u0=; b=CYtJFnTm6Y0DOlJe6wcBzlhBsNiPwuxQ9j82I6RrZ9+7QpGVkQ6wirJOM/fifJwCN2 ZlrVXnZyvSPv1YatDDVyCXrFDw9aszKLFtEyu6Ej0R+zed3CRUN8hxmV9keJnqUS14cj 1IvxTHF0qMQtjZyGpPD2QjBzSQKUQhknRPXwKU9GYCHtrZ8SGkF6swSb/I1vCB1/d9Qs RW7LT1jd81NKOyTcRmut1KRLwXjtDOPu5YgZeQkuHiSbph1tzzKczGr222k8oRkmpfdp bTVUpWnc9WnrngUMqb8f9Bd/3FnGlseSYC4Kd1lSyjmNlKE1TNf2FBcyLuRv54bKcC7W ejKg== Received: by 10.180.92.9 with SMTP id ci9mr11632618wib.15.1336916785700; Sun, 13 May 2012 06:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-211-220.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.211.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4sm13391639wiz.1.2012.05.13.06.46.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 May 2012 06:46:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 15:46:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart148548744.0G9A9ty9QB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205131546.17753.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.4 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 13:46:27 -0000 --nextPart148548744.0G9A9ty9QB Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.4 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. Th= e=20 packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng* [3] format. =20 There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users= ). The patch [4] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.4,1.tbz) =3D=20 4fe4310bb941cb151c3d9cba719342db MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.4,1.txz) =3D=20 6f224419362e1c75ce7fc799e3038b00 MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.4,1.txz) =3D=20 fdb9db7a3d54daa9c9437d813b01592c [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng [4] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh [*] To install the port first fix the arch tag use the 'fix-arch.sh' script= =20 from mediafire [2] --nextPart148548744.0G9A9ty9QB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk+vuykACgkQUaaFgP9pFrIeugCdFj3gHyVZlv46jP3Bv1bZA3Q7 fZUAmwUgG10lDiqrR5rIsXLhkynwjp+G =61bf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart148548744.0G9A9ty9QB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 18:20:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA57106566B for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 18:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.barnabas@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A4C8FC0C for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 18:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so8332721obc.13 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 11:20:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=FIN71pAVC6Pj/s9aDFRoRt577Zpgb97Tm+D84/idmoQ=; b=bYTnyQPGDIkgCtKEv6qMnYEpvrBxeI41+tPDD+EbTL00qFuhazVTlmyv5rDhFDRRqN +aLXNCp+8m6t6jb+iSaQNJpWWdzSE7GD9qkYoFyL78hY1mjnnQ2Xt0IdXNpw37JnVc5u T3ziKFueZIZNT6iOQ8PbTkd9UpI8Kspl3e9DLKM563LEMpcWw3aAGgW5g/N9lt8aRrR3 //Vj5U4USFgpyNJY6BOphqUtXuUaNyeEsZGx38/AN49hLvdFd3LGO0GDEib+7PXdNawy xe9Zs/xuRgzVaqB3ZOQr2OylXvNoQj78/WdtdxyYqiOeaV17M+j+k7IHHQ4mYGp7VNDq SgSg== Received: by 10.60.13.134 with SMTP id h6mr8036973oec.11.1336933209678; Sun, 13 May 2012 11:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip68-98-76-182.ph.ph.cox.net. [68.98.76.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tx2sm16550341obb.8.2012.05.13.11.20.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 May 2012 11:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 11:20:51 -0700 From: Colin Barnabas To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20120513182051.GA63499@hs1.VERBENA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: avrdude and arduino X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 18:20:10 -0000 Has anyone been able to get the Arduino Uno board working with avrdude? I keep getting programmer not responding errors. avrdude: ser_recv(): programmer is not responding avrdude: stk500_recv(): programmer is not responding This is the command I'm using: %sudo avrdude -F -v -v -v -v -c arduino -p ATMEGA328P -P /dev/cuaU0 -U flash:w:flash.hex Any suggestions would be much appreciated. -- Colin Barnabas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 22:10:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B461065670 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 22:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp2.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787408FC0A for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 22:10:20 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=iCxQ2kq66ZHF3wPjlKzQeMuOkVoQeyqQG3WjwENx55Q= c=1 sm=0 a=Sj-eBYvPyQsA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=5iCrPLdQuELZtGDkVaIA:9 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:50951] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 22/B2-26116-B4130BF4; Sun, 13 May 2012 18:10:19 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 18:10:19 -0400 Message-ID: <22.B2.26116.B4130BF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 22:10:20 -0000 I would like to build FreeBSD to install in two places: regular hard drive and also on a USB stick, probably 8 GB. USB stick install would be for backup, in case something goes awry with a later update, then I have something to fall back on; could also install tools such as gdisk to use on hard drive. I tried make installkernel and make installworld, but those didn't fully work right the second time, with DESTDIR=/mnt (USB stick main partition). /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't say how to update for two DESTDIRs on the same build. Update (from 9.0_RELEASE amd64 to STABLE) was successful on main, hard-drive installation. I had spontaneous reboots at times of inactivity, without cleanly umounting file systems, under the release, but upgrading to STABLE fixed that. I also want to build the same 9.0_STABLE to install on a 16 GB USB stick, which could be used on my older computer, but this would be i386 version; I could also use it on new computer for 32-bit compatibility needed for emulators/wine (but not doscmd, I tried that and didn't like it.). I can't do this on old computer from FreeBSD 8.2 because of shortage of disk space and only 256 MB RAM. I could do that either concurrently (how?) or after the amd64 update. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 22:38:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8FA106564A for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 22:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4190B8FC17 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 22:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so8658198obc.13 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 15:38:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=Qx77eWIeTI8w9P0/MB2K1RJgsc65gEhlaJ1DN/510l8=; b=sCbhLa8uBZ3qemMX0JBTl2Yturlimv9HBwu1/e7qVNOB7LZsDTgNL75Q3ViQr+gy36 qkk54t3N+EUxqAiPlK0W/WNLLXv5LPmGNiTp/p/5jFP3VGqFWCqywnNsYUirBoaN99o2 yvOYl2tZN20NPGcEFMSanPZ0uDTmz3QAhbPSDX1tr61mJEbX57IGYPG9KkA1vYfUNPBN iXpPLcBtSnUQFo1VhP4KGkE4SfSckd+auqAIG0JtFL6lET99HeYo6HoNIfNhFnFZvWEd jTeWXQ/6cxQSlfM6n6UzrKXrxfn3b+MGN8IFioF8xLqha28700sy9vqlxcuA6h2LOIqu 4j9g== Received: by 10.50.185.165 with SMTP id fd5mr3063858igc.46.1336948710468; Sun, 13 May 2012 15:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wh8sm15587502igb.11.2012.05.13.15.38.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 May 2012 15:38:29 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:38:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205131738.19921.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: epson all in one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 22:38:31 -0000 Hi! My got a new Epson WorkForce 545 which I connected through router and it works for her but... Does anyone has experience with Epson ALL IN ONE printers on FreeBSD, please? Thanks in advance. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 00:17:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C8106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 00:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA468FC08 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 00:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q4E0JCT4061915; Sun, 13 May 2012 19:19:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 19:19:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205140019.q4E0JCT4061915@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, lumiwa@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <201205131738.19921.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: epson all in one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 00:17:52 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 13 17:40:24 2012 > From: ajtiM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:38:19 -0500 > Subject: epson all in one > > Hi! > > My got a new Epson WorkForce 545 which I connected through router and it works > for her but... > Does anyone has experience with Epson ALL IN ONE printers on FreeBSD, please? Some Epson 'ALL IN ONE' printers, 'just work'. Others don't. The one you have is, unfortuntely, in the latter category. It uses a 'new' (apparently invented in 2005) _proprietary_ method for communicating 'rasterized' images of page content to many of their dumb 'wimprinters', called "ESC/P-R". Epson has a list of which of their printers use this protocol -- I'm not sure if it is _all_ the models they offer, or not. Given that they published a list (apparently not updated since 2010), of modelssthat -do- use it, it would seem to be a reasonable conclusion that _not_ all 'recent' models do. Epson has a development kit, for writing ESC/P-Rdrivers. see; That page claims the library is portable to Linux in many variations -- so it should be portable to FreeBSD with relatively minor effort. For 'network' printing, it just needs the Berkeley 'sockets' API. The bad news, it requires an NDA to get access to the library, *AND* it appears you cannot provide what you develop to others -- Quote: "To use the ESC/P-R Library for development, an NDA agreement is necessary. Epson will provide the ESC/P-R Library free of charge once the agreement has been finalized. To use the ESC/P-R Library for actual commercialization, a license agreement will be necessary." Reading 'between the lines' on the ESC/P-R library, it is a 'standardized' means of communicating with many/most of Epson's newer generation of "winprinters". The *host-based* driver has to _rasterize_ (convert from 'text'/PS/PCL to a bitmap image for transmission to the printer) the page content before sending the bitmap to the printer. Given that, the 'easiest' way out would be to write a 'device driver' for Ghostscript, where Ghostscript did all the 'rendering' smarts, and just called the driver to transmit the bitmap to the winprinter.. When shopping for a printer to use with any sort of a Unix-based (including Lunix and *BSD) system it is a GOOD IDEA(tm) to make sure that the printer meets at least one of the following three criteria: 1) supports the H-P developed 'PCL' printer language (And HPGL, the graphics language that is part of later versions of PCL. 2) Supports Adobe's Postscript language, or a 3rd party 'emulation' thereof. 3) is supported as an output device by the 'ghostscript' PS interpreter. (The 'ideal' printer supports -both- 1) and 2), _plus_ it will also directly print PDF files.) A printer that meets 1) _or_ 2) will work with -any- kind of system with virtually no effort. These are things that you need to investigate BEFORE buying a printer. An entire 30 seconds of online research for "{printername/model} specs' turned up a web page that showed that the -only- 'language' that this printer speaks is "ESC/P-R". The failure to mention PCL, or PostScript (or an emulation), would have disqualified it -- for _me_, anyway -- from further onsideration. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 01:09:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAA6106566C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 01:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F078FC1F for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 01:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA06712 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 19:09:28 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201205140109.TAA06712@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 19:09:21 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Maximum number of "tun" pseudo-devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 01:09:32 -0000 Everyone: I'm running a busy FreeBSD-based that may handle large numbers of simultaneous connections. I'm currently using software that creates a "tun" device for each connection. However, after it hits tun127 (128 pseudo-devices), it doesn't seem to want to create any more. What sets the limit on the number of "tun" devices that can exist in the system, and how can the limit be adjusted? Is there a similar limit on, say, "ng" devices? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 03:10:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C8B106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 03:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDD08FC12 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 03:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STlff-0004Zq-QE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:10:03 +0200 Received: from 90.165.93.73 ([90.165.93.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:10:03 +0200 Received: from iam by 90.165.93.73 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:10:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 04:55:20 +0200 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <4FA41738.4040901@kleppnett.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.165.93.73 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/12.0 In-Reply-To: <4FA41738.4040901@kleppnett.no> Subject: Re: Off topic: NetBSD or OpenBSD for Alpha server ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 03:10:13 -0000 On 05/04/2012 07:51 PM, Kenneth Hatteland wrote: > Since the alpha forum for FreeBSD is closed, and there has not been > Alpha support since 6.4 I wondered about which OS to install on a alpha > server I am getting quite soon. I guess FreeBSD 6.4 is perhaps not the > best since it is not maintained and the ports tree likewise ? > > So I checked the 2 other main contenders and just wanted to ask if > anyone here had an opinion what 2 install of the BSDs ? Or perhaps > FreeBSD 6.4 is a good choice ( I have not tested Open or Net BSD so > FreeBSD is my hometurf) The machine will probably be a server to have > fun with and hopefully learn something from. Perhaps some server role in > my rig, routing, security etc..... > > Any advise would be nice :) Hi. I don't have experience with Alpha but OpenBSD supports this arch. Take a look: - http://openbsd.org/51.html . The number of pre-built packages is not bad. - http://openbsd.org/alpha.html Cheers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 03:37:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575A3106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 03:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rloefgren@forethought.net) Received: from mzpi3.forethought.net (mzpi3.forethought.net [216.241.36.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7BD8FC17 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 03:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 216-241-45-95.static.forethought.net ([216.241.45.95] helo=auden.jmla.com) by mz1.forethought.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STZbP-0000XH-L8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 08:16:51 -0600 Message-ID: <4FAFC253.5000200@forethought.net> Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 08:16:51 -0600 From: Reed Loefgren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120425 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FAFAF7F.4010409@webrz.net> <20120513152509.09dbfc10.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120513152509.09dbfc10.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: CSH prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 03:37:52 -0000 On 05/13/12 07:25, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:56:31 +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote: >> In cshell I use this prompt: set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[%/]> " >> The problem I face now is that if I use this prompt with symbolic links, >> the presented location is displaying the symbolic link rather than the >> real directory name. >> Is there a way of preventin this? > Yes, a very ugly way which I just found out: > > alias precmd 'set WD=`pwd`; set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[$WD]> "' > > Example: > > [3:21pm] r56[/]> cd /sys > [3:21pm] r56[/usr/src/sys]> _ > > It redefines the whole prompt at any command that could > affect the current working directory (not only "cd" can > do that). This is needed as any call to `pwd` stored into > a variable will only affect $prompt once - this is when > it's set, only at this time $WD would be evaluated. So > that's why this strange command. :-) > > Oh, and I just improved it. How about this? > > alias precmd 'set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[`pwd`]> "' > > Much better. :-) I've butchered it further, but thanks for doing the *real* work: user: alias precmd 'set prompt = "\n%{\033[32m%}%m [%h] [%@]%b%{\033[0m%} [`pwd`]$ "' root: alias precmd 'set prompt = "\n%{\033[31m%}%m [%h] [%@]%b%{\033[0m%} [`pwd`]$ "' Regards, r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 05:11:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55008106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2695E8FC14 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.65] by nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 May 2012 05:11:35 -0000 Received: from [98.136.185.45] by tm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 May 2012 05:09:35 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp106.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 May 2012 05:09:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1336972175; bh=SQCS8G6hv8StlumeRXi5zwc+mHf15r3qTlSu7dhrLng=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OnIcYhqpA5ne6LKQOacNLPC70de5p6eV82Jcacf/VPyUTTGoyFuP3zOuikwSsBez89jyXkcs2s6BSxRGWYcTqV1zdjmOYBbJcaoGfv6VZaMiS5l/LfeBzIOTCRfpN8RJC2BCEZ32HGMP0pa4+Y2fEwTRZm1fDpHhqHXjxs2RZF0= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 183089.79118.bm@smtp106.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: VvsZRboVM1kyzV9KnQrGf1hx9h5fFjELFEW9Y62Il1neFMm XYdJJSmimG49ZS6g7gIitgjb9lv83ou.Dr5DaEjfuh3jkz9xFzHM1UPOoVPb Wm04cT6L16byH6lDAoE3xa5CacICt8yefZKES03w_W9IkUnizSVcGuMtRmdO UoJjpmvSUpCqF1vhOOSOQSMgrvnZ8lTPr4GHCxtFfQbDCYKe7i3P5IfLOB7U PL77.dBvXdmEfpET7AFA4zHjpelJpGEsyF_Txiv2tPRmhpYTCI7T6x8ukQQi UAYLhPWWoGsbfFlf9d07RoDwJkVctDGc5eAUdY3KtSK.IP9DwaqhnpjeyYXf WpEXZKdG3p2k2.l2WKxekQs1gV67BdI10w4Z75dJWCtTTjwuhKeDWtrOY9GP zATXdkbBFiyatRRTCj7Z1eRnu0FJlJ0Tap.6tqsbadS9ySMh8zzn68lXL X-Yahoo-SMTP: Xr6qjFWswBAEmd20sAvB4Q3keqXvXsIH9TjJ Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (moonlightakkiy@209.85.214.182 with plain) by smtp106.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 May 2012 22:09:35 -0700 PDT Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so9150606obc.13 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 22:09:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.14.193 with SMTP id r1mr9650364oec.16.1336972174417; Sun, 13 May 2012 22:09:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.47.136 with HTTP; Sun, 13 May 2012 22:09:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:09:34 -0600 Message-ID: From: PseudoCylon To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? (or not at all?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 05:11:41 -0000 > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:21:30 +0200 > From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" > Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(or not at all?) > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20120513012130.64d78c1f@dijkstra.cruwe.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII > > On Sat, 12 May 2012 14:49:18 +0200 > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > >> Currently I am fighting with (against?) a dlink dwl-g122 usb wlan >> dongle. The casing is claiming the thing to be of H/W-version E1, >> F/W-version 5.00, which I interpret as hardware and firmware. >> >> I am running 9-stable (FreeBSD ritchie.cruwe.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD >> 9.0-STABLE #8 r235064: Fri May 11 21:32:52 CEST 2012 >> cjr@ritchie.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RITCHIE =A0amd64) and >> admittedly, dwl-g122 is not included in the hw-compatibility list for >> 9.0. >> >> I am also aware that others have been unsuccessful, though some time >> back, to get dlw-g122 e running >> (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D27123). >> >> However, I am somewhat successful in getting the dongle recognized by >> if_run.ko, though not to work as I would like to: >> >> dmesg gives then >> >> [...] >> ugen0.3: at usbus0 >> run0: on usbus0 >> run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 (MIMO 1T1R), address >> b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by >> hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec >> run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded >> ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. >> wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec >> I have no explanation for the multiple occurrences, I have been trying >> for some time now, though. >> Was wlan_amrr compiled into kernel? >> >> sudo ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev run0 wlanmode hostap >> sudo ifconfig wlan0 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid bsdap >> channel - >> If you want to use WPA, you need to run # /etc/rc.d/hostapd onestart > OK, update on the situation: I can get wlan to work in AP-mode, I must > not enable WPA, though. Having enabled hostapd for one time kills my > wlan and requires a complete reboot. > Did it panic? Can you post back trace? AK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 06:20:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12FB106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 06:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no) Received: from asav4.lyse.net (asav4.lyse.net [81.167.36.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB4C8FC16 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 06:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asav4.lyse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567C36C171 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:03:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lyse.net Received: from terra?hatteland1.org (129.81-166-80.customer.lyse.net [81.166.80.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no) by asav4.lyse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42616C16E for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:03:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FB0A023.9090002@kleppnett.no> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:03:15 +0200 From: Kenneth Hatteland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Ports: Apache openoffice build eats all /usr and fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 06:20:53 -0000 Rebuilding and upgrading to apache openoffice on my main desktop fails because the procedure consumes all my 17 gbs of available /usr space, which still is not enough apparently. The build routine says 11gb is more than enough. Libreoffice will not build on this machine for some reason so at this point that is not an alternative. Anyone here have ideas what is wrong ( some nob must be turned the wrong way ;) ) Blessed be... Kenneth Hatteland From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 06:31:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8631065672 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 06:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9189D8FC1F for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 06:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so3095685laa.13 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 23:31:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hTaNzfk153VeZalrLLIZOOId+mVg0EEAPSGzBF2P+3Y=; b=pTCLYJiGqeJr9NxvNh3X3g7hSrswVf03xpeaO3htvLV2JZpWrS/s99Xdr4iPWZXciV RjuKqpMn2G18RcAcIMPwcKz92rnrpbHnKuctzszAHFDWvcH0SazinAk9Wx9tAjlxnglt 9j8GHtS0Jk/Htaqqg2gdxKiALDsefF/uJq43YBlmjie+rVXg9QhNpTAWIShsqRtCWlOl wcy6qT9G0WAviJFyJA+1w87I2bWvfAdK0vDhsi8eXjEXWDgML67qGBwdHbOjydji/FR7 RKMwe8mhqxLnu46lROKqXGG+KgQH8wqcWnYaMuktBi7SFDPndOiOqeXKv470jJWoHEFe 7b7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.29.166 with SMTP id l6mr1513685lbh.68.1336977061194; Sun, 13 May 2012 23:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.24.131 with HTTP; Sun, 13 May 2012 23:31:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120513182051.GA63499@hs1.VERBENA> References: <20120513182051.GA63499@hs1.VERBENA> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:31:01 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Colin Barnabas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: avrdude and arduino X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 06:31:03 -0000 On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Colin Barnabas wrote: > Has anyone been able to get the Arduino Uno board working with > avrdude? I keep getting programmer not responding errors. Not for the Uno, but I got Arduino Duemilanove working. > > avrdude: ser_recv(): programmer is not responding > avrdude: stk500_recv(): programmer is not responding This is typical when the microcontroller is somehow busy or stuck. > > > This is the command I'm using: > > %sudo avrdude -F -v -v -v -v -c arduino -p ATMEGA328P -P /dev/cuaU0 -U flash:w:flash.hex This is what I use for Duemilanove sudo avrdude -V -F -c stk500v1 -p m168 -b 19200 -P /dev/cuaU0 -U flash:w:flash.hex (Arduino) I also have a Pololu 3pi[1] which uses an ATmega328 and I can download the software into the chip using this: sudo avrdude -c avrispv2 -p m168 -P /dev/cuaU0 -U flash:w:test.hex (Pololu) HTH [1] http://www.pololu.com/catalog/product/975 > > Any suggestions would be much appreciated. > > > -- > Colin Barnabas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 06:42:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E881106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 06:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CA08FC08 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 06:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedlingblack-earthcouk.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4E6gMA5062254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 07:42:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4E6gMA5062254 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4E6gMA5062254; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedlingblack-earthcouk.local Message-ID: <4FB0A94E.4050501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:42:22 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <22.B2.26116.B4130BF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> In-Reply-To: <22.B2.26116.B4130BF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig29EF5A830B85A1D75F964F62" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 06:42:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig29EF5A830B85A1D75F964F62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/05/2012 00:10, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I tried make installkernel and make installworld, but those didn't > fully work right the second time, with DESTDIR=3D/mnt (USB stick main > partition). What exactly went wrong? Setting DESTDIR is the correct way to do this sort of thing. You only need to set it when running the installworld or installkernel steps though -- there's nothing that gets compiled into /usr/obj which prevents you from installing into a different than normal tree. I use this sort of construct frequently for updating jails, or when managing boot environments. > /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't say how to update for two DESTDIRs on the > same build. For each different DESTDIR, just repeat the installworld, installkernel, check-old, delete-old* steps setting DESTDIR=3D/some/where on the make command line. The equivalent for mergemaster is to add '-D /some/where' to the commandline. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig29EF5A830B85A1D75F964F62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+wqU4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyZXgCffPoTI9l9Q7roftxsAxIf6tN+ kpsAn2NAjcQX1Ntuqo4F0tpEG4O7qvFu =OYf9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig29EF5A830B85A1D75F964F62-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 08:16:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23BA106566B for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBC88FC0C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so5101703yen.13 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 01:16:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rwFHXxOVAwUwVht4FafEa4zzPIJje3lSYumYqeDL070=; b=HQfnzz8nv8AB/4q56gjUO5JrLq3Lp7if4XVsADu4x1Q+1iVaUJGQ4RPGai3Uj4EcYo HRyE5RlbmTCffhfSf+ZT88Rbr32UdkfEtaW96EugJjNyA8roATCdXZ0zBltMhRkGR9GL 5fvmo8N9hDLok4u4N6cHpcJqFbMnNlzD+mdW1q2QE8ZY0lmpVd9rvzziQcDNPWU0EeIU IBk7I46FeILt9aeInxb6IJlWrBc82T4Kz2GtLHQaAhHbiYeE6wE+U4uE6JR6Aznerk+R 0N5yH8BhrOt33szreMNvggRmyB3z4ztnYQFiFt2bHTHpdzlOGEBOp0mkKmwi+EqOnUbG 4mLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.181.232 with SMTP id dz8mr3723003igc.72.1336983407633; Mon, 14 May 2012 01:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.246.9 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 01:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:16:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: p5-XML-SAX and portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:16:48 -0000 There is an update of p5-XML-SAX in the ports, /usr/ports/UPDATING says: 20120512: AFFECTS: users of textproc/p5-XML-SAX AUTHOR: crees@FreeBSD.org p5-XML-SAX (X-S) was split into p5-XML-SAX-Base (X-S-B) and p5-XML-SAX for version 0.99. Since X-S-B now installs some files formerly installed by X-S the package for X-S must be deinstalled before updating X-S. # pkg_delete -fx p5-XML-SAX # portmaster textproc/p5-XML-SAX (users of pkgng can substitute pkg_delete with pkg delete) But what is the instruction for users of portupgrade ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 08:51:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CB8106566C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60288FC19 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8321F3D1AB; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:51:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4E8p3ej001937; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:51:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:51:03 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Reed Loefgren Message-Id: <20120514105103.532295af.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4FAFC253.5000200@forethought.net> References: <4FAFAF7F.4010409@webrz.net> <20120513152509.09dbfc10.freebsd@edvax.de> <4FAFC253.5000200@forethought.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CSH prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:51:12 -0000 On Sun, 13 May 2012 08:16:51 -0600, Reed Loefgren wrote: > On 05/13/12 07:25, Polytropon wrote: > > On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:56:31 +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > >> In cshell I use this prompt: set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[%/]> " > >> The problem I face now is that if I use this prompt with symbolic links, > >> the presented location is displaying the symbolic link rather than the > >> real directory name. > >> Is there a way of preventin this? > > Yes, a very ugly way which I just found out: > > > > alias precmd 'set WD=`pwd`; set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[$WD]> "' > > > > Example: > > > > [3:21pm] r56[/]> cd /sys > > [3:21pm] r56[/usr/src/sys]> _ > > > > It redefines the whole prompt at any command that could > > affect the current working directory (not only "cd" can > > do that). This is needed as any call to `pwd` stored into > > a variable will only affect $prompt once - this is when > > it's set, only at this time $WD would be evaluated. So > > that's why this strange command. :-) > > > > Oh, and I just improved it. How about this? > > > > alias precmd 'set prompt = "%B[%@]%b %m[`pwd`]> "' > > > > Much better. :-) > > I've butchered it further, but thanks for doing the *real* work: > > user: > alias precmd 'set prompt = "\n%{\033[32m%}%m [%h] [%@]%b%{\033[0m%} > [`pwd`]$ "' > > root: > alias precmd 'set prompt = "\n%{\033[31m%}%m [%h] [%@]%b%{\033[0m%} > [`pwd`]$ "' Allow me a final note: It's "normal" to denote non-root access with % (for csh) or $ (for sh, bash and many others), and root access with #. You can easily configure that to be automatically instead of $ if you like. Example: set promptchars = "%#" set prompt = "%n@%m:%~%# " For root, # will appear at the end, and % for non-root. Of course, you can easily apply this to your setting if you like, and you can define other characters if needed (e. g. "$#" or ">#"). Even though in your prompt shown above, root is shown by red color, that important attribute _might_ be missing when using a non-color terminal or a misconfigured emulator, so the user might not be aware of the immense power currently active (as no user name is shown in the prompt). Maybe this inspiration is useful to you. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 11:46:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C190D106566C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 11:46:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sperber@freebsd.org) Received: from mx.frozen-zone.org (frozen-zone.org [176.9.255.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9868FC1B for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 11:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx.frozen-zone.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 571FE17F27F; Mon, 14 May 2012 11:47:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mx.frozen-zone.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from webmail.frozen-zone.org (unknown [10.13.37.10]) by mx.frozen-zone.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12D9E17DCA6 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 11:47:34 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 13:47:34 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch To: In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: sperber@freebsd.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2 Subject: Re: p5-XML-SAX and portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:46:09 -0000 On 2012-05-14 10:16, n dhert wrote: > There is an update of p5-XML-SAX in the ports, /usr/ports/UPDATING > says: > > 20120512: > AFFECTS: users of textproc/p5-XML-SAX > AUTHOR: crees@FreeBSD.org > p5-XML-SAX (X-S) was split into p5-XML-SAX-Base (X-S-B) and > p5-XML-SAX for > version 0.99. Since X-S-B now installs some files formerly > installed by > X-S > the package for X-S must be deinstalled before updating X-S. > # pkg_delete -fx p5-XML-SAX > # portmaster textproc/p5-XML-SAX > (users of pkgng can substitute pkg_delete with pkg delete) > But what is the instruction for users of portupgrade ? Susbstitude "portmaster" with "portupgrade" is my guess. Armin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 12:06:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13ADE1065670 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7583A8FC12 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4EC6Csk001521 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:06:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4EC6CVI001518 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:06:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:06:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 May 2012 14:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: what software can support that UPS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:06:25 -0000 seems like it is very badly made USB interface, all class data is empty, ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON bLength = 0x0012 bDescriptorType = 0x0001 bcdUSB = 0x0101 bDeviceClass = 0x0000 bDeviceSubClass = 0x0000 bDeviceProtocol = 0x0000 bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x0008 idVendor = 0x0403 idProduct = 0xe520 bcdDevice = 0x0400 iManufacturer = 0x0001 iProduct = 0x0002 iSerialNumber = 0x0003 bNumConfigurations = 0x0001 FreeBSD gives only ugen interface. what (if any) software support that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 12:17:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB8B106566C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcigar@ulb.ac.be) Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be (mxin.ulb.ac.be [164.15.128.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D578FC1A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:17:20 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBABz3sE+kD30E/2dsb2JhbAANN4V5sRUBAQEEAQEBICsgChELGAkWCwICCQMCAQIBFQEJJg4FAgQBAQEBGQSHeKdfiUaJCYsaGYJJgg6BGASOd4EjgzWDP4RRjUmBXQ Received: from bebif01.ulb.ac.be (HELO [10.0.0.194]) ([164.15.125.4]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 14 May 2012 14:16:01 +0200 Message-ID: <4FB0F781.8070301@ulb.ac.be> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:16:01 +0200 From: Julien Cigar Organization: Belgian Biodiversity Platform User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050604000903000800030804" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: what software can support that UPS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:17:21 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050604000903000800030804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd ? On 05/14/2012 14:06, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > seems like it is very badly made USB interface, all class data is empty, > > > > ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL > (12Mbps) pwr=ON > > bLength = 0x0012 > bDescriptorType = 0x0001 > bcdUSB = 0x0101 > bDeviceClass = 0x0000 > bDeviceSubClass = 0x0000 > bDeviceProtocol = 0x0000 > bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x0008 > idVendor = 0x0403 > idProduct = 0xe520 > bcdDevice = 0x0400 > iManufacturer = 0x0001 > iProduct = 0x0002 > iSerialNumber = 0x0003 > bNumConfigurations = 0x0001 > > > FreeBSD gives only ugen interface. > > > what (if any) software support that? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --------------050604000903000800030804-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 13:21:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6CD1065670 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C89D8FC08 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4EDKscY008559; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:20:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4EDKrWa008556; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:20:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:20:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Julien Cigar In-Reply-To: <4FB0F781.8070301@ulb.ac.be> Message-ID: References: <4FB0F781.8070301@ulb.ac.be> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 May 2012 15:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what software can support that UPS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 13:21:00 -0000 > /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd ? ? - so what to give as device? /dev/ugen1.3? set UPSCABLE usb UPSTYPE usb not set DEVICE as specified in comments for USB devices. can't find UPS. tried setting DEVICE to /dev/ugen1.3 - no avail. tried /usr/ports/sysutils/nut selected "EVER" driver, and set up /dev/ugen1.3 as port - driver fails. from what i found in linux groups it should work as USB HID device. but uhid doesn't attach. > > On 05/14/2012 14:06, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> seems like it is very badly made USB interface, all class data is empty, >> >> >> >> ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL >> (12Mbps) pwr=ON >> >> bLength = 0x0012 >> bDescriptorType = 0x0001 >> bcdUSB = 0x0101 >> bDeviceClass = 0x0000 >> bDeviceSubClass = 0x0000 >> bDeviceProtocol = 0x0000 >> bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x0008 >> idVendor = 0x0403 >> idProduct = 0xe520 >> bcdDevice = 0x0400 >> iManufacturer = 0x0001 >> iProduct = 0x0002 >> iSerialNumber = 0x0003 >> bNumConfigurations = 0x0001 >> >> >> FreeBSD gives only ugen interface. >> >> >> what (if any) software support that? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- > No trees were killed in the creation of this message. > However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 13:23:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE15106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376318FC0C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4EDNHXI008592; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:23:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4EDNGU6008589; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:23:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:23:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Thomas Mueller In-Reply-To: <22.B2.26116.B4130BF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> Message-ID: References: <22.B2.26116.B4130BF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 May 2012 15:23:17 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 13:23:22 -0000 > I would like to build FreeBSD to install in two places: regular hard drive and also on a USB stick, probably 8 GB. > > USB stick install would be for backup, in case something goes awry with a later update, then I have something to fall back on; could also install tools such as gdisk to use on hard drive. > > I tried make installkernel and make installworld, but those didn't fully work right the second time, with DESTDIR=/mnt (USB stick main partition). REALLY can't help you without any info attached. As from your description it just have to work and you did all fine. anyway i usually just do installs to DESTDIR=/something, then tar.gz it up, and untar whenever i need (but separately tar.gz for /boot/kernel subdir) use --unlink option when untarring on live system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 13:25:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EC41065673 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479E18FC23 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4EDP48o008610; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:25:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4EDP37K008607; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:25:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:25:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20120513182051.GA63499@hs1.VERBENA> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 May 2012 15:25:04 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Colin Barnabas Subject: Re: avrdude and arduino X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 13:25:09 -0000 >> This is the command I'm using: >> >> %sudo avrdude -F -v -v -v -v -c arduino -p ATMEGA328P -P /dev/cuaU0 -U flash:w:flash.hex > > This is what I use for Duemilanove > sudo avrdude -V -F -c stk500v1 -p m168 -b 19200 -P /dev/cuaU0 -U > flash:w:flash.hex (Arduino) maybe stupid question but why do you use sudo for it? can't you just set up devd.conf to set right owner to /dev/cuaU0, or even better make link like /dev/atmel -> /dev/yourdevice - so no matter how many usb serial devices you connect it will always have same name? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 14:27:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D719106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C548FC0C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 May 2012 10:27:12 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BMI94830; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:27:11 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 May 2012 10:27:11 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20401.5695.291122.787065@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:27:11 -0400 To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: References: <4FB0F781.8070301@ulb.ac.be> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Julien Cigar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what software can support that UPS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:27:23 -0000 Wojciech Puchar writes: > > /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd ? > > ? - so what to give as device? /dev/ugen1.3? > set > > UPSCABLE usb > UPSTYPE usb My BackUPS RS 500 works fine using those and a empty "DEVICE" field. It is possible this is a new/redesigned model that Apcupsd does not handle correctly. (APC is famous for not having a consistant interface, even model lines.) If so, you should post to the apcupsd mailing list where these kind of things get prompt attention. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 15:02:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08A8106566C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1658FC0A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 15:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so4702011lbo.13 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HjA6bMdNcw9Hnt04cKLj06HTabMDn0ASaZraIhURPS0=; b=tw3r2elBAr7JRTL6SF1QVxBspLNFx53/FkrFndUQSvW2lfOzGmb7q0lSdcIfWjuwAo 51XxkKDDg1g7YMl/VG6zew6iR3W7hOlZ8hdP6M720Z2XiVAkUZlQKiaNB6MOv0UF3ibw dPgPvBORDTqHBsMYg7f1xk7Wn7vgxdRnys/pIm2rpVxzm7E+hcJjc3C/a51BYGMi3h8D 0pDxeFLFqgaidPD6TTaVPFYMkhevb2vM2VG6zPTGMgniRLBp8ivJkY3z+e68EBwkHE9A lGcHt1D6dgNUwKk4TP3ij+NJynS415nA2kAogAGmNcG/2jMnJ20Y8owmmz7gbmzmYy8Q ExZg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.82.165 with SMTP id j5mr3323525lby.50.1337007727113; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.24.131 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 08:02:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120513182051.GA63499@hs1.VERBENA> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:02:06 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Colin Barnabas Subject: Re: avrdude and arduino X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:02:09 -0000 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> This is the command I'm using: >>> >>> %sudo avrdude -F -v -v -v -v -c arduino -p ATMEGA328P -P /dev/cuaU0 -U >>> flash:w:flash.hex >> >> >> This is what I use for Duemilanove >> sudo avrdude -V -F -c stk500v1 -p m168 -b 19200 -P /dev/cuaU0 -U >> flash:w:flash.hex (Arduino) > > > maybe stupid question but why do you use sudo for it? can't you just set up > devd.conf to set right owner to /dev/cuaU0, or even better make link like > /dev/atmel -> /dev/yourdevice - so no matter how many usb serial devices you > connect it will always have same name? Yes, I'll do it when I use the Arduino the next time (it's been a while since the last time). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 17:14:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E616106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D658FC14 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3870D143FB for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1A0B7143FA; Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from dijkstra.cruwe.de (p5B379A3B.dip.t-dialin.net [91.55.154.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54F0E143F8 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:14:42 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120514191442.505a0a08@dijkstra.cruwe.de> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? (or not at all?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:55 -0000 On Sun, 13 May 2012 23:09:34 -0600 PseudoCylon wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 11 > > Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:21:30 +0200 > > From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" > > Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(or not at all?) > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <20120513012130.64d78c1f@dijkstra.cruwe.de> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII > > > > On Sat, 12 May 2012 14:49:18 +0200 > > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > > > >> Currently I am fighting with (against?) a dlink dwl-g122 usb wlan > >> dongle. The casing is claiming the thing to be of H/W-version E1, > >> F/W-version 5.00, which I interpret as hardware and firmware. > >> > >> I am running 9-stable (FreeBSD ritchie.cruwe.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD > >> 9.0-STABLE #8 r235064: Fri May 11 21:32:52 CEST 2012 > >> cjr@ritchie.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RITCHIE =C2=A0amd64) and > >> admittedly, dwl-g122 is not included in the hw-compatibility list > >> for 9.0. > >> > >> I am also aware that others have been unsuccessful, though some > >> time back, to get dlw-g122 e running > >> (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D27123). > >> > >> However, I am somewhat successful in getting the dongle recognized > >> by if_run.ko, though not to work as I would like to: > >> > >> dmesg gives then > >> > >> [...] > >> ugen0.3: at usbus0 > >> run0: on > >> usbus0 run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 (MIMO 1T1R), > >> address b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec ieee80211_load_module: load the > >> wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: > >> b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > >> ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > >> wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > >> I have no explanation for the multiple occurrences, I have been > >> trying for some time now, though. > >> >=20 > Was wlan_amrr compiled into kernel? Nope, using the module. BTW, loading the if_run module gives ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. Did exactly that, i.e., loaded the wlam_amrr by hand. Do you think I might fare better by using in-kernel drivers instead of modules? =20 > >> > >> sudo ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev run0 wlanmode hostap > >> sudo ifconfig wlan0 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid > >> bsdap channel - > >> >=20 > If you want to use WPA, you need to run > # /etc/rc.d/hostapd onestart Amongst other things, I also did that. >=20 > > OK, update on the situation: I can get wlan to work in AP-mode, I > > must not enable WPA, though. Having enabled hostapd for one time > > kills my wlan and requires a complete reboot. > > >=20 > Did it panic? Can you post back trace? No, it did not panic. After trying to enable wpa, the systems becomes very sluggish on the network side and recovers upon pulling the dongle. I interpret that as some kind of crashing the driver. I would be happy to provide a back trace, I do not know how, though. Where do I need to look to learn that? Thanks and cheers, Christopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 19:00:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0B6106566C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 19:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D918FC15 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 19:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4EJ0gUE042382; Mon, 14 May 2012 21:00:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4EJ0gXt042379; Mon, 14 May 2012 21:00:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 21:00:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <20401.5695.291122.787065@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: References: <4FB0F781.8070301@ulb.ac.be> <20401.5695.291122.787065@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 May 2012 21:00:42 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Julien Cigar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what software can support that UPS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:00:49 -0000 >> >> UPSCABLE usb >> UPSTYPE usb > > My BackUPS RS 500 works fine using those and a empty "DEVICE" field. how your UPS shows in dmesg? > It is possible this is a new/redesigned model that Apcupsd does > not handle correctly. (APC is famous for not having a consistant > interface, even model lines.) If so, you should post to the apcupsd > mailing list where these kind of things get prompt attention. > > > Robert Huff > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 20:39:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E76A1065673 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ataraxi@telia.com) Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (smtp-out12.han.skanova.net [195.67.226.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C308FC1E for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alice.nodomain.nowhere (95.199.147.48) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u51204108) id 4FAE31D9000971D1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 22:38:31 +0200 Received: by alice.nodomain.nowhere (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1967B1F4E63; Mon, 14 May 2012 22:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alice.nodomain.nowhere (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182B91F4457 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 22:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:34:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Conny Andersson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Problem with newvers.sh in FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 20:39:11 -0000 Hi, I have used FreeBSD since 2002, first on i386-arch-machines and from October 2010 on an (Intel i5 750) amd64-arch-machine. On this new computer, a Dell Precision T1500, I now have three operating systems on /dev/ada1s1-3: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE, FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE and FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE. Only the last release have the problem described in the following text. For the first time I got a problem after a kernel is recompiled. Below one can see that what now, after a recompilation should be FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #1 still is #0, and with a faulty date/time stamp. The number after the hash mark is not updated, neither is the date/time in these kernel messages. What is wrong? newvers.sh? ========= Misc info msgs about this problem ======================= # $FreeBSD: src/sys/conf/newvers.sh,v 1.83.2.15.2.4 2012/04/08 05:09:40 kensmith Exp $ % ll /boot | grep kernel drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 31232 10 Maj 17:22 kernel drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 31232 9 Maj 14:49 kernel.old (I am a Swedish FreeBSD user, hence 'Maj' instead of May) % sysctl -a | grep kern.version kern.version: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Mon May 7 20:00:37 CEST 2012 % uname -a FreeBSD alice.nodomain.nowhere 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0: Mon May 7 20:00:37 CEST 2012 root@alice.nodomain.nowhere:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/ALICE amd64 ================================================================== I compared by diff /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh with the same file in FreeBSD 8.2 and found some differences. I saved newvers.sh in FreeBSD as ORIG_newvers.sh and copied the newvers.sh from FreeBSD 8.2 to FreeBSD 8.3. Edited the two lines REVISION="8.3", "RELEASE=8.3-RELEASE" and recompiled. It worked, so now I get the correct answers: % sysctl -a | grep kern.version kern.version: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #2: Sun May 13 21:16:37 CEST 2012 % uname -a FreeBSD alice.nodomain.nowhere 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #2: Sun May 13 21:16:37 CEST 2012 root@alice.nodomain.nowhere:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/ALICE amd64 Best Regards, Conny Andersson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 21:22:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4707A106566C for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 21:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ip@os4.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ABF8FC14 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 21:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so3919095laa.13 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:22:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-mailer:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=pVQc/2LKq/xiqs1PscBJ+d1JsCb6tD4tM/LfR5Ml9Fs=; b=hffOp0jfvVCpkTBZgBRtRHmvRBh8YkzRRPdxAE1/rohtmr370zCWTc4UKP7NKr6HIN mYnGJVF+K4qFjSFQimEwxPMvp5Psai8tYivMs8XqwIbF6GpE/uhwgi5euPEoTjvKLbp+ 4el6emyf2mVOhaPLAh6AckobtZVHGm9Ws1kbTt9ofoy/7XU5nwn+Ysw3wRlb4RaIhswU XOZtS6GruqUBzWplUmaUDiQOKiZLqkQ5XiV9ivFWlInmj+sYjhxTAjl9ySFXn/HkKJQ2 ug99dVWaNKJAquhRxRvaf1zwqSeGNDhGaXlrQZfuhWIrV96YqaKD9CVuSXoiRSZ4qVQy 9QIg== Received: by 10.112.104.100 with SMTP id gd4mr4406713lbb.24.1337030531792; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Webmail ([213.251.210.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2sm25582718lbd.7.2012.05.14.14.22.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 May 2012 14:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ilya Message-ID: <4FB17780.5090802@domainman.ru> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 01:22:08 +0400 From: DomainMan User-Agent: Underowl/7.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, board@freebsdfoundation.org X-Mailer: Novell/Underowl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnAf5N1fZBbUQuOJuQuSEDP8mnTGTqxDnbZwfIfplLaKvNdrv4t1CnoY0NZH8NrReE4uL9X Cc: Subject: freebsd.asia X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 21:22:14 -0000 Hello, I want to make a gift to the FreeBSD project and give your domain freebsd.asia. Who should I contact? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 22:41:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D14106564A for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 22:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4860E8FC18 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 22:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q4EMROgY005232; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:27:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id q4EMROAu005231; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:27:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:27:24 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120514222724.GA5158@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Ben Kaduk Subject: AFS install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:41:41 -0000 Hi, I installed AMD64 FreeBSD 8.3 on a new machine a couple of days ago. It seems fine so far. This afternoon I tried to install OpenAFS 1.6.0 on it from /usr/ports/net/openafs The configure ran happily and I didn't notice any errors. But, the make died soon after starting with the following complaints. make: don't know how to make ./param.amd64_fbsd_83.h. stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/openafs/work/openafs-1.6.0. ** Error code 1 I presume that means that it does not know about FreeBSD 8.3 yet. I rummaged around in the README it left in the ../work directory and saw a bunch of AMD64 versions up to 8.1 (and even 9.0) but not 8.2 or 8.3. I noticed in the Makefile where it says: IGNORE= Supports FreeBSD 8.0 and later I am not sure how that plays in it. I am definitely not a make hacker. Anyway, is there a good tinker to get past this or do I have to wait until something gets updated in the port? Or, did I just do something stupid? By the way, I need just the client. I do not intend to start a server or a cell on this machine. I just need to talk to the cell at work. Is there a way of only installing the client? (I think the client is the biggest part, but still, do not need the server part hanging around if it would work happily that way) Thanks for any help, ////jerry Jerry McAllister jerrymc@msu.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 00:48:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0A11065670 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp1.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305D58FC08 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:48:34 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=35TcX+QIOQeVEFsxXAziJtlpzzKIYlbP0KOReIHpq8E= c=1 sm=0 a=F3fr6IO9xwAA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=_ItHec519RBo7upyVw0A:9 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp02.insight.synacor.com header.from=t.mueller1@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp02.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:36640] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 83/5C-10195-F37A1BF4; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:45:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 20:45:51 -0400 Message-ID: <83.5C.10195.F37A1BF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Wojciech Puchar Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 00:48:35 -0000 > What exactly went wrong? Setting DESTDIR is the correct way to do this > sort of thing. You only need to set it when running the installworld or > installkernel steps though -- there's nothing that gets compiled into > /usr/obj which prevents you from installing into a different than normal > tree. > I use this sort of construct frequently for updating jails, or when > managing boot environments. > > /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't say how to update for two DESTDIRs on the > > same build. > For each different DESTDIR, just repeat the installworld, installkernel, > check-old, delete-old* steps setting DESTDIR=/some/where > on the make command line. > The equivalent for mergemaster is to add '-D /some/where' to the > commandline. > Cheers, > Matthew > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. I guess after the first installkernel, to default location, I should immediately make installkernel again, this time with DESTDIR=/mnt? Better to "make buildkernel" and "make installkernel" as two separate steps, rather than "make kernel"? After rebooting single-user, do "mergemaster -p", then "mergemaster -p -D /mnt", and then "make installworld" and immediately following that, "make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt" ? After that, I would do "mergemaster -i" followed by "mergemaster -i -D /mnt"? And then make delete-old followed by "DESTDIR=/mnt make delete-old"? Would I need to do "make distribution"? First time, "make installkernel DESTDIR=/mnt" only installed part. I installed to USB stick only after fully upgrading on main installation, finally copied /boot/kernel directory, and that USB stick is now bootable. So now I know how to make a USB stick bootable with GPT. Maybe some of the files were cleaned out? It is surely useful to have a rescue backup, considering the possibility of an update going awry on the main installation. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 04:51:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44BB106566B for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 04:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-5.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4270E8FC12 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 04:51:08 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 12074422-b7fd66d0000008f9-41-4fb1e0bb8dd2 Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 33.1F.02297.BB0E1BF4; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:51:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q4F4p73k007574; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:51:07 -0400 Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q4F4p5dW024980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 May 2012 00:51:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id q4F4p4HF007686; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:51:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 00:51:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20120514222724.GA5158@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: References: <20120514222724.GA5158@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrbv7wUZ/g+urZSxeft3EYrHoWIQD k8eMT/NZPJ4diQhgiuKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKuHF3O2PBGeGK2ac3szUwTufvYuTgkBAwkXgy M62LkRPIFJO4cG89WxcjF4eQwD5GiflHJjJDOBsYJfZcuwnlHGCSWN32mxHCaWCUuLOmlRWk n0VAW+L0oVZmEJtNQEVi5puNbCC2iICaxLsPV8DizAKKEuvanjOB2MICEhJL9i4BszkFzCV2 ts5lB7F5BRwlnr48DBYXEjCTOHN/C9h8UQEdidX7p7BA1AhKnJz5hAVipqXEv7W/WCcwCs5C kpqFJLWAkWkVo2xKbpVubmJmTnFqsm5xcmJeXmqRrqlebmaJXmpK6SZGUJiyuyjtYPx5UOkQ owAHoxIPr9P6jf5CrIllxZW5hxglOZiURHkV7gCF+JLyUyozEosz4otKc1KLDzFKcDArifBO agHK8aYkVlalFuXDpKQ5WJTEedW13vkJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZGU4OJQkeP/dB2oULEpNT61I y8wpQUgzcXCCDOcBGm76AGR4cUFibnFmOkT+FKOilDivBEhCACSRUZoH1wtLI68YxYFeEeYV AaniAaYguO5XQIOZgAbzC6wDGVySiJCSamDk6r0l3u/4Ys3pjfc0mMRbeTW+XlcKSr4fu8Ps xv/v7t1cGeqJ96QjLn9M3DvPvLpwgYqT0WHZtWdji9gDVLjL9OcordLOzim/MuXH8m8T5f+E 7WtVyD8a6Sf1kT1WSugyn1zSCac33XnzeSYvUA+MtNc/HmR2a9qJ5uSnTyR/5vP07mxfI6vE UpyRaKjFXFScCACG9Nzu/gIAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 04:51:08 -0000 Hi Jerry, On Mon, 14 May 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote: > Hi, > > I installed AMD64 FreeBSD 8.3 on a new machine a couple of days ago. > It seems fine so far. > > This afternoon I tried to install OpenAFS 1.6.0 on it from > /usr/ports/net/openafs > > The configure ran happily and I didn't notice any errors. > But, the make died soon after starting with the following complaints. > > make: don't know how to make ./param.amd64_fbsd_83.h. stop > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/openafs/work/openafs-1.6.0. > ** Error code 1 > > I presume that means that it does not know about FreeBSD 8.3 yet. That's right; the OpenAFS build system has lots of history behind it, which means that it is not particularly elegant at handling this sort of thing. > > I rummaged around in the README it left in the ../work directory > and saw a bunch of AMD64 versions up to 8.1 (and even 9.0) but > not 8.2 or 8.3. I noticed in the Makefile where it says: > IGNORE= Supports FreeBSD 8.0 and later > I am not sure how that plays in it. I am definitely not a make hacker. > > Anyway, is there a good tinker to get past this > or do I have to wait until something gets updated in the port? > > Or, did I just do something stupid? No fault on your end; I need to push in updates for 8.3 and 10.0 support but have been busy with schoolwork. For now, if you're up for a little bit of tinkering, you could go in to /usr/ports/net/openafs and 'make clean && make extract', then: cd work/openafs-1.6.0/src/config && cp param.amd64_fbsd_82.h param.amd64_fbsd_83.h and continue with the usual make install, etc., in /usr/ports/net/openafs/. If that still does not compile/run, please send me the build log (or dmesg -a output if a runtime failure) and I will look at it. > > > By the way, I need just the client. I do not intend to start > a server or a cell on this machine. I just need to talk to the > cell at work. Is there a way of only installing the client? > (I think the client is the biggest part, but still, do not need > the server part hanging around if it would work happily that way) The upstream OpenAFS build system is not condusive to just building the client; I have asked about this. It is fairly easy to just build the server, but since my interest was mostly in the client I did not add an option for doing so. Thanks for the report, and sorry to have been so slow at catching up to 8.3/10.0. -Ben Kaduk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 08:28:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE1F106566B for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 08:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E538FC0C for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 08:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89F63CFDD; Tue, 15 May 2012 10:28:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4F8SdSm002023; Tue, 15 May 2012 10:28:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:28:38 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-Id: <20120515102838.de3a2a40.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <83.5C.10195.F37A1BF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> References: <83.5C.10195.F37A1BF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 08:28:42 -0000 On Mon, 14 May 2012 20:45:51 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I guess after the first installkernel, to default location, > I should immediately make installkernel again, this time with > DESTDIR=/mnt? That should be possible, you only have to make sure that both "install targets" are fine with the kernel you just built (e. g. both i386 _or_ amd64). > Better to "make buildkernel" and "make installkernel" as two > separate steps, rather than "make kernel"? Yes. You only need to "make buildkernel" once, then "make installkernel" for both $DESTDIRs. > After rebooting single-user, do "mergemaster -p", > then "mergemaster -p -D /mnt", and then "make installworld" and > immediately following that, "make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt" ? Refer to the commend header in /usr/src/Makefile for the correct procedure. Without having it tested, the following commands in SUM (after you have successfully installed the new kernels) should work as intended: # merpemaster -p # make installworld # make delete-old # mergemaster # merpemaster -p -D /mnt # make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt # make delete-old DESTDIR=/mnt # mergemaster -D /mnt # reboot Also see the comment regarding "make delete-old-libs" to be applied after reboot correspondingly. > After that, I would do "mergemaster -i" followed by > "mergemaster -i -D /mnt"? And then make delete-old followed > by "DESTDIR=/mnt make delete-old"? It should be possible to pass DESTDIR= to make instead of "prefixing" make with it. The parameter seems to be applied for _any_ of the targets (as long as it would affect that target). You can add additional parameters to the mergemaster examples above (such as -i). > Would I need to do "make distribution"? I don't think so, unless you want to create a distribution media. > First time, "make installkernel DESTDIR=/mnt" only installed part. What parts (of the kernel set) have been installed? To observe differences, it might be helpful to save a `ls` or `ls -lR` output before and after the installation and compare them. > I installed to USB stick only after fully upgrading on main > installation, finally copied /boot/kernel directory, and that > USB stick is now bootable. So now I know how to make a USB > stick bootable with GPT. Maybe kernel modules for GPT have been missing? Check /etc/src.conf for any strange settings, see "man 3 src.conf" for details. You can use this file to customize and "tweak" your builds. > Maybe some of the files were cleaned out? I'm not sure in how far the install* targets to remove files. I suppose they will overwrite files if required... > It is surely useful to have a rescue backup, considering the > possibility of an update going awry on the main installation. That's right. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 09:27:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD056106564A for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 09:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3C78FC08 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 09:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765FF3CAB2; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4F9RXLN002499; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:27:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:27:33 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Bernt Hansson Message-Id: <20120515112733.6cedf929.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4FB21DD0.7090603@bananmonarki.se> References: <4FB21DD0.7090603@bananmonarki.se> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: This does look strange X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:27:41 -0000 On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:11:44 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote: > Hello list > > After a reinstall of winxp, yes I know but the games. You like playing with obsoleted OS imitations, that's okay. :-) > I have a fat32 slice/partition/postcard whatever it's called. It should be called a slice, because slice refers to a "DOS primary partition", and those are covered with a FAT or NTFS file system directly (unlike BSD which puts partitions into a slice to carry more than one file system). But postcard is also okay. :-) > Mocking me with: > > testbox# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4 > ** /dev/ad4 > Invalid signature in fsinfo block > Fix? yes > fsck: /dev/ad4: Floating point exception: 8 > testbox# Very strage. You're not supposed to fsck /dev/ad4 I think, but you should name the _slice_ where "Windows XP" is installed on. That should be something like /dev/ad4s1 (if it's the 1st primary partition on that disk). Furthermore, -t msdosfs looks strange. As far as I know, the "newer" versions of "Windows" come with NTFS as the primary file losing system, so -t ntfs should be worth a try. The command should be something like that: # fsck -y -t ntfs /dev/ad4s1 or # fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4s1 if you have _not_ formatted the postcard using NTFS, but FAT (which corresponds to msdosfs). > Anyone know what to do, is there a msdosfs fsck? Yes, it's a native tool called CHKDSK.EXE. :-) Really: You should first use the native tools provided by "Windows" to fix a problem that seems to be a "Windows" problem. If everything fails, you can always relapse to forensic tools running on FreeBSD, or simply load your backup sets. There's also emulators/mtools in the ports collection which might contain tools useful in this situation. If you've just accidentally tried to fsck the wrong device file, just forget everything I mentioned and use the correct one. However, I'm not fully sure if FreeBSD's fsck can be used to _really_ perform file system checks on FAT or NTFS partitions, erm postcards. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 11:46:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0A9106566B for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgeorge.ml2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734DF8FC16 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so8021482vbm.13 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 04:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Xeo2N4aAj4ISzc3+CvIFJkU6p0KNcnxCcHJTLR4wOME=; b=uxT5abes89LSpMYyi5o9H8H6ifGEOJa2OXCJoHLKye1kxUlhHPoJDI16Exlx7LcIOc 3JGDPex6c0B3NppGa2IFmTu67DFe3toHB4YlBDkThgjq2qOcVi+hJRRUlIRTc/KCoLll QIF5vKKHMHA4I8Mz/24wGMN+qwSXvZVvqHpbMAOCKnGNQlR7ROYrh+83tj/mhjPtcxp/ QoySfmsxWOaVjSyHCQZ8fgP/XunEvueeFIaLaPwE9e2tgql662Bll6wo7o+Hk0BGig+r WnaPuI20PhOudw0zyp6XQfKuFMRr7ldPfAkX2U/ms3DbocbtgfVllNYSwbaB9dXX8ldg kGmQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.142.8 with SMTP id o8mr2079901vcu.8.1337082372566; Tue, 15 May 2012 04:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.96.73 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 04:46:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120510183452.GA389@sobremesa.juanfra.info> References: <20120510183452.GA389@sobremesa.juanfra.info> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:16:12 +0530 Message-ID: From: Siju George To: Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, users@crater.dragonflybsd.org Subject: Re: Xen/VM? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:46:13 -0000 On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > Dfly doesn't support Xen. Some providers support HVM (not Amazon) and > you can give a try to dfly in this environment. I don't know if dfly > works on Xen HVM or not. Probably the performance will be poor. > Actually FreeBSD now runs on Amazon using HVM. http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2012-01-16-FreeBSD-now-on-all-EC2-instance-types.html I guess something similar can be done with dragonfly as well. Currently Amazon detects HVM instances as Windows instances and charge you the MS windows licence fee. Recently I attended a training by Amazon in Bangalore and I raised this issue during the Question & Answer session to the Amazon folks. The reply I got was that this work to get FreeBSD running without the additional cost is in their to-do list but it is not of high priority. To make them increase the priority one thing that can be done is for users to mention or request it in their forums. The discussions happening in the forums adds to the priority of a task. So I guess the user group can make this happen fast if the requirements are made known in their forum. https://forums.aws.amazon.com/forum.jspa?forumID=30 Thanks Siju From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 13:15:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AF1106566C for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C844B8FC08 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4FDF3EB065715; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:15:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4FDF3rc065712; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:15:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:15:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Bernt Hansson In-Reply-To: <4FB21DD0.7090603@bananmonarki.se> Message-ID: References: <4FB21DD0.7090603@bananmonarki.se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 May 2012 15:15:04 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: This does look strange X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:15:38 -0000 > After a reinstall of winxp, yes I know but the games. > > I have a fat32 slice/partition/postcard whatever it's called. > > Mocking me with: > > testbox# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4 > ** /dev/ad4 > Invalid signature in fsinfo block > Fix? yes > fsck: /dev/ad4: Floating point exception: 8 > testbox# > why ad4 not ad4s1 (or s2 etc...)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 13:16:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C481065677 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62D08FC0C for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4FDGFNG065721; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:16:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4FDGFYk065718; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:16:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:16:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <20401.5695.291122.787065@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: References: <4FB0F781.8070301@ulb.ac.be> <20401.5695.291122.787065@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 May 2012 15:16:15 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Julien Cigar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what software can support that UPS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:16:19 -0000 thanks for help. found it non-FreeBSD specific. just this model is not supported by available software. Thanks again On Mon, 14 May 2012, Robert Huff wrote: > > Wojciech Puchar writes: > >> > /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd ? >> >> ? - so what to give as device? /dev/ugen1.3? >> set >> >> UPSCABLE usb >> UPSTYPE usb > > My BackUPS RS 500 works fine using those and a empty "DEVICE" field. > It is possible this is a new/redesigned model that Apcupsd does > not handle correctly. (APC is famous for not having a consistant > interface, even model lines.) If so, you should post to the apcupsd > mailing list where these kind of things get prompt attention. > > > Robert Huff > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 13:18:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3F51065675 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4FD8FC12 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4FDIHdL065739; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:18:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4FDIGX6065735; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:18:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:18:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20120514222724.GA5158@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: References: <20120514222724.GA5158@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 May 2012 15:18:17 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ben Kaduk Subject: Re: AFS install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:18:20 -0000 > I am not sure how that plays in it. I am definitely not a make hacker. > > Anyway, is there a good tinker to get past this > or do I have to wait until something gets updated in the port? 8.2 version should work just fine as 8.3 version. Some simple fixing of makefiles/other files or even symlinks should correct it. > > Or, did I just do something stupid? Probably not you but program authors by requiring to change source every time new FreeBSD version will go out. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 13:24:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8370E1065676 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D108FC21 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4FDOasH025995; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:24:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4FDOa2C025974; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:24:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:24:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <201205140109.TAA06712@lariat.net> Message-ID: References: <201205140109.TAA06712@lariat.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 May 2012 15:24:36 +0200 (CEST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum number of "tun" pseudo-devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:24:40 -0000 i would rather look at software that uses "tun" interfaces instead of FreeBSD which seems to support more than 128 tuns out of the box: this: # x=1;while [ $x -lt 2000 ];do ifconfig tun$x create;x=$[x+1];done worked fine. ifconfig shows 2000 tun interfaces # x=1;while [ $x -lt 2000 ];do ifconfig tun$x destroy;x=$[x+1];done worked fine too. what software do you use for tun interfaces? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 13:41:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C699A1065678 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cknipe@savage.za.org) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894F28FC08 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so11815891obc.13 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 06:41:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=JDkmgcnO0PVEQSnT9IfEziPQyVbgCfGeEdU3EdDE+l8=; b=mryhgfx/hv81AhqYWS7TeF/xs/zKbR3KVokPYbL9qW8n7UjBQzJFCjilyDou1+ZexO COLxYooaWchDOTmn5hIUfe1NfPfZxfTmmsd14E8yEclF79L0yo3dfjWlijvrpDV0RkZM 4CiQITOnCi62cRuzG9e/vEgBBN+PYRpt09flLp+aHaXcG3HFXpIg78GI+d37WiiT3ukA Pto+ViopEYRycMvnaefFS2kaSzz9LPm6lq5lndK7i6+vjGVftvvdNMXBXsIXEYTaNXjt xGD0y5XThxTkp0aFhl0mgVMpvUor+gud7LbKSYow2gRRtYHCvAsAtnPvxDsjd/qojL1e 587Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.207.41 with SMTP id lt9mr6664154obc.41.1337089285961; Tue, 15 May 2012 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: cknipe@savage.za.org Received: by 10.182.169.103 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [196.43.208.60] In-Reply-To: <201205140109.TAA06712@lariat.net> References: <201205140109.TAA06712@lariat.net> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:41:25 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9iaF78C9neZcPBHvawqSxVNnx_0 Message-ID: From: Chris Knipe To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkScINvh8zXsZGBa6K/k9RLQxhb9bBSls0r0SFGHoWztFwJjsmmVZJBZcO6OZo9R+L63ycJ Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum number of "tun" pseudo-devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:41:26 -0000 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Brett Glass wrote: > I'm running a busy FreeBSD-based that may handle large numbers of > simultaneous connections. I'm currently using software that creates a "tun" > device for each connection. However, after it hits tun127 (128 > pseudo-devices), it doesn't seem to want to create any more. What sets the > limit on the number of "tun" devices that can exist in the system, and how > can the limit be adjusted? Is there a similar limit on, say, "ng" devices? You don't say which version of FreeBSD you're using, but older versions of FreeBSD had the option to specify a maximum number of pseudo-device to allow. For example pseudo-device tun 1 # Tunnel driver(user process ppp) In your kernel would only allow for 1 tun device to be created. If you're using an older (5.x / 4.x) version of FreeBSD, I'd say check your kernel config. Nut sure whether this is still relevant in newer versions of FreeBSD, but documentation suggest that it is no longer the case with newer versions. -- Regards, Chris Knipe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 15:51:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2F51065686 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5088FC12 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so5887304lbo.13 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 08:51:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8Km6Mu30sV/h1pXPBwV45p1ZAnCLtpj3zaCR3QTeDcM=; b=m9LVOu9S1SVY7ejD+b75lguqkso2HIOvGQbihSDtia4DDRQO4dCAV25I1yAh3m1Mmw AHmvnK9+SiZKPM58hnZpuLvA/+JKixJwcVMxG6pV7jPoGlIhG0OTSy9PJSG/9ufoZk1o xq5fNuzVntLf4Qa5HXeqBcV/Fp5b5DMHXT31awt80yk9uGYirIAQ0ekjpHekrZPdsO/9 jruIcDIbO3yvj/GvnDERNIRSh/cK1HnCRM7NC4y4RZJlM6CU4dwqH0Y0tBwX9sK8dHa+ KwhB15qtwCKXVP75t0G/VuwTudaAnw2Wz9IW4HXB/K2FaxzXeB/IeAkZ5HgzHiRJwxrA 4ULg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.128.137 with SMTP id no9mr12961002lab.2.1337097073611; Tue, 15 May 2012 08:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.24.131 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 08:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:51:13 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Radeon and DRM crash 9.0-RELEASE. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:51:15 -0000 Hi, I'm having some system crashes from time to time. I had this before but until recently I couldn't set my system so I could get crash dumps. My video card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9700. I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE for amd64. These are excerpts from two crash dumps text files: core.txt.3: Fatal trap 28: machine check trap while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff816480a3 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff804a5eb970 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff804a5eb990 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 3 current process = 2254 (Xorg) trap number = 28 panic: machine check trap cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80869abe at kdb_backtrace+0x5e #1 0xffffffff80833fb7 at panic+0x187 #2 0xffffffff80b18b80 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff80b190c0 at trap+0x110 #4 0xffffffff80b0396f at calltrap+0x8 #5 0xffffffff816a305b at drm_ioctl+0x31b #6 0xffffffff8075597b at devfs_ioctl_f+0x7b #7 0xffffffff8087afb1 at kern_ioctl+0x111 #8 0xffffffff8087b1df at sys_ioctl+0xef #9 0xffffffff80b18480 at amd64_syscall+0x450 #10 0xffffffff80b03c57 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7 Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0xb200000000070f0f MCA: Global Cap 0x0000000000000105, Status 0x0000000000000004 MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0xf4a, APIC ID 0 MCA: CPU 0 UNCOR PCC BUSLG ??? ERR Other timed out core.txt.4 Fatal trap 28: machine check trap while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff816462b6 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff804a5eb930 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff804a5eb940 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 3 current process = 2254 (Xorg) trap number = 28 panic: machine check trap cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80869abe at kdb_backtrace+0x5e #1 0xffffffff80833fb7 at panic+0x187 #2 0xffffffff80b18b80 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff80b190c0 at trap+0x110 #4 0xffffffff80b0396f at calltrap+0x8 #5 0xffffffff8164f3cc at radeon_cp_indirect+0x24c #6 0xffffffff816a305b at drm_ioctl+0x31b #7 0xffffffff8075597b at devfs_ioctl_f+0x7b #8 0xffffffff8087afb1 at kern_ioctl+0x111 #9 0xffffffff8087b1df at sys_ioctl+0xef #10 0xffffffff80b18480 at amd64_syscall+0x450 #11 0xffffffff80b03c57 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7 dmesg | grep agp agp0: on hostb0 drm.ko is loaded and agp is included in kernel. AGP for the card seems to be properly detected: dmesg | grep drm drm0: on vgapci0 info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 256MB info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.31.0 20080613 info: [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map info: [drm] Loading R300 Microcode info: [drm] Num pipes: 1 grep -i "Direct rendering" /var/log/Xorg.0.log (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled The crash is not easily reproducible but seems to be more likely to occur the more activity there is in the screen (like when scrolling a window quite fast). Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 16:35:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9D8106566B for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from umber.umb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B360E8FC08 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so3286690wib.13 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 09:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ITePeYtNmilyHmx3YiOT8+SVdsrRE0k8oGyMVwNmrxc=; b=jk5CTXFZfjeGTrmRHaIad+3OX6Y2gOdBUMpLmFjD/SfFHqS2dsfQfBEDjgiXjD4S3X v93RnopSp2ONg2gjVYJRUFeL86Z2mTVXHaBFS0QLQtYog6M+6wYj/tzmQ3dTLAtosIgJ 1AR5Ixl5jpRT1bQ2FoBYBfyCXjePgELyBFOy1qTkUxYpKAZao23YMODO1JD3W+Bl+hn/ qPUs5fDZUGaaxM/jlayGDSyq9/Kh1GFiNF9uTrxTfwQPB63vDDTtsYXJlgwlqE/1AX8Y 1qhwEnF6eFrkfoQCA9oNP1n8vGzFWNycKtdQ9yFM6ZAbwjHhzdsOGLjm0cS9RNWzeJxk h6ag== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.88.233 with SMTP id bj9mr9960436wib.1.1337099720361; Tue, 15 May 2012 09:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.95.72 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 09:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:35:20 +0500 Message-ID: From: Umbreen Masood To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: http://localhost/phpmyadmin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:35:27 -0000 -- **Umbreen** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 19:33:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBEE106564A for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 19:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsdocs2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F508FC15 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 19:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so4957413laa.13 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cihYbyjzMI0ZMHnxodQQYQvT+G5fbU7lK352UMuQbGU=; b=CTNUve0dRusZE79uZJ7B1OArm4QULqAyyEiFYi83AU++W2xEUNvPus0OYYnGcaWVbV l5xHXrggsyhFdQlofKN3uaGhgbyR8b0OCFQtF+93pmmif9QEMVxl8b2Yhj2lNZYnwdry Lsrn/tMi9vxWwD4Wf6qEVlc9nyRbI/UHIrw47zdYk0Lq0OeClbYQdyqa8A4YzIBDkbhr o9gBRQzlpWA1Oa+40uBCv0PCC4kWid6nXIGglICE7ut2xbNRa0v/0X5hOzwKSE8io+r+ IQMzmHLEMku/jHA53MYEdGF5YrzrQqVE+FM+QsOiHBIryuvjIGirMQ34leLmXimigiaI oSfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.109.198 with SMTP id hu6mr215939lab.21.1337110395142; Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.13.46 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700 Message-ID: From: Lauren Scott To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Article Inquiry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 19:33:17 -0000 Hello, I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the below article: "General Commands Manual for RDIST" June 3, 1993 FreeBSD I appreciate any help you are able to provide. Best regards, -- Lauren Scott *Research Analyst* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 20:08:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E9D1065672 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5899E8FC12 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedlingblack-earthcouk.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4FK8At6002738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 21:08:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4FK8At6002738 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4FK8At6002738; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedlingblack-earthcouk.local Message-ID: <4FB2B7A2.9060805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:08:02 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD55F0DB251E92BD3F8F5ECB3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: Article Inquiry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:08:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD55F0DB251E92BD3F8F5ECB3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15/05/2012 21:33, Lauren Scott wrote: > I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the be= low > article: >=20 > "General Commands Manual for RDIST" > June 3, 1993 > FreeBSD >=20 > I appreciate any help you are able to provide. Tricky. The CVS Repo only goes back to 1994, and I can't see any obvious references to rdist in there. Of course, I hope you all realise that this means in about 1 month, FreeBSD will be legally an adult. There's still some files in the src tree that haven't changed in all that time. eg: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/doc/psd/05.sysman/ Cheers, Matthew PS. To the OP: it might be worth asking on freebsd-hackers@... There's still a number of people around that were active that far back. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigD55F0DB251E92BD3F8F5ECB3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+yt6kACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyPrwCfSXpvXh9lyGo6aBYiDsK1+ku+ 270AnR5hTk6JfY+oKG86iy5mXZG0cU1M =IbfT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD55F0DB251E92BD3F8F5ECB3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 20:12:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38301065672 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A608FC19 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401853CF78; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4FKCIPs002833; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:12:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:12:18 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Lauren Scott Message-Id: <20120515221218.aefd0fa5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Article Inquiry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:12:20 -0000 On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700, Lauren Scott wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the below > article: > > "General Commands Manual for RDIST" > June 3, 1993 > FreeBSD > > I appreciate any help you are able to provide. Are you sure about the date? If I read /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree correctly, FreeBSD 1.0 is of 1993-11-01 (newer than 1993-06-03, the date you provided). The rdist program isn't part of the FreeBSD OS, it is provided as a port. However, the web manpage collection contains the following manual: FreeBSD General Commands Manual for RDIST March 17, 1994 4.3 Berkeley Distribution Source: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=44bsd-rdist&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports Does this help? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 22:24:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E2A106566B for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66F98FC0C for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4FMOHQu048347; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4FMOHEt048344; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:17 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Colin Barnabas In-Reply-To: <20120513182051.GA63499@hs1.VERBENA> Message-ID: References: <20120513182051.GA63499@hs1.VERBENA> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:17 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: avrdude and arduino X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:24:18 -0000 On Sun, 13 May 2012, Colin Barnabas wrote: > Has anyone been able to get the Arduino Uno board working with > avrdude? I keep getting programmer not responding errors. > > avrdude: ser_recv(): programmer is not responding > avrdude: stk500_recv(): programmer is not responding > > > This is the command I'm using: > > %sudo avrdude -F -v -v -v -v -c arduino -p ATMEGA328P -P /dev/cuaU0 -U flash:w:flash.hex > > Any suggestions would be much appreciated. An easy way might be to install devel/arduino, turn on Preferences/Show verbose output during compilation, and copy the command line it uses. The catch is that you have to have the IDE set to use the correct board and programmer. I have some scripts I can dig through if that fails. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 22:33:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C395C1065670 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9698FC0A for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4FMXKPi048416; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:33:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4FMXKov048413; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:33:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:33:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120515221218.aefd0fa5.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120515221218.aefd0fa5.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 May 2012 16:33:20 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Lauren Scott , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Article Inquiry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:33:23 -0000 On Tue, 15 May 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700, Lauren Scott wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the below >> article: >> >> "General Commands Manual for RDIST" >> June 3, 1993 >> FreeBSD >> >> I appreciate any help you are able to provide. > > Are you sure about the date? If I read /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree > correctly, FreeBSD 1.0 is of 1993-11-01 (newer than 1993-06-03, the > date you provided). > > The rdist program isn't part of the FreeBSD OS, it is provided > as a port. However, the web manpage collection contains the > following manual: > > FreeBSD General Commands Manual for RDIST > March 17, 1994 > 4.3 Berkeley Distribution > > Source: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=44bsd-rdist&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports There was an older one with FreeBSD 1.0: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rdist&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+1.0-RELEASE&arch=default&format=html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 02:11:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086061065670 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 02:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooke.black@instantraffic.com) Received: from instantraffic.com (mail.instantraffic.com [184.171.245.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7868FC16 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 02:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:03:52 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Brooke Black X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20120516021106.086061065670@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: let's work together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:11:06 -0000 Hi, My name is Brooke Black and I would really love to tell you how docs.freebsd.org can rank even better in Google. I'm a SEO expert working at Instant Traffic and while doing a research for some of my colleagues I found your email address and decided to contact you immediately. If you are interested I will be happy to send the additional information and all the details needed to make it happen. Thanks a lot, Brooke instantraffic.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 03:34:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026D31065672 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 03:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm13-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm13-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97A618FC12 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 03:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.53] by nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 May 2012 03:34:44 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.126] by tm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 May 2012 03:34:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 May 2012 03:34:44 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1337139284; bh=Uv18PSRa4+YA6mAYcbfNZ7sytZ5Q5M76RgCyzt5IN5w=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v5JiIzUZdO8N2v0dmt1coNEfDUxL6/W7dJskPXZ8vohd1WZiJHU0Pr8dEX4P6NzebN0HpCpg+2zBjKVx9372F05LbbRx0YMGvvzLf5vqnMGPu7KV4HO31q/PIenqpk3CLLEVWlh+7x8WXtBVfYHODM2jmmAEh79vjTRGO8tizX8= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 830448.51598.bm@smtp205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: dD4alSkVM1makn8UIIHRs5zmqAW_kfWiVcZP3vBSRw23R6b CFGLyuqY0oJ6lVOOa.DbPP8V48uB1gDjdIjIhi1IqmgeWL.K946rjjb023RD DtmAcEdB1mqFDUpAyXQXURehRHKMoEaTTLEP3hWtwo6a6cTDICbqrCeS4q7k dkhUOWJfwj8CF4INoLyTQztQxTNkdEnqKaPWu4gS6beYO186Roi57vQAonLX ROCbvOENMXxFnwdQdR061UWpRln_77u2GOWQqEiTb.BO1tieV1yzhaiA5p5_ SD_uzAxcT8sWS7QL0KyDdMU4cHYsteAN5CDR7Nh1BqTDng4Q9DmU4J2.fDqx y.f2Vj8jPPs0V9Nd_D3xlQEqS4a0SeRGwJJI5VSOeI_XZWdqXsqDb.U962Xf h4qtkMvCZl4mdof3BrNPsxP1xK1rn4CKbVR7OyA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Xr6qjFWswBAEmd20sAvB4Q3keqXvXsIH9TjJ Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (moonlightakkiy@209.85.214.182 with plain) by smtp205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2012 20:34:44 -0700 PDT Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so531976obc.13 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:34:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.197.69 with SMTP id is5mr1287716obc.32.1337139284195; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.47.136 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:34:44 -0600 Message-ID: From: PseudoCylon To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? (or not at all?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 03:34:52 -0000 ----------------------------- > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:14:42 +0200 > From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" > Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(or not at all?) > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20120514191442.505a0a08@dijkstra.cruwe.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8 > > On Sun, 13 May 2012 23:09:34 -0600 > PseudoCylon wrote: > >> > ------------------------------ >> > >> > Message: 11 >> > Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:21:30 +0200 >> > From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" >> > Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(or not at all?) >> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > Message-ID: <20120513012130.64d78c1f@dijkstra.cruwe.de> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII >> > >> > On Sat, 12 May 2012 14:49:18 +0200 >> > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: >> > >> >> Currently I am fighting with (against?) a dlink dwl-g122 usb wlan >> >> dongle. The casing is claiming the thing to be of H/W-version E1, >> >> F/W-version 5.00, which I interpret as hardware and firmware. >> >> >> >> I am running 9-stable (FreeBSD ritchie.cruwe.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD >> >> 9.0-STABLE #8 r235064: Fri May 11 21:32:52 CEST 2012 >> >> cjr@ritchie.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RITCHIE =A0amd64) and >> >> admittedly, dwl-g122 is not included in the hw-compatibility list >> >> for 9.0. >> >> >> >> I am also aware that others have been unsuccessful, though some >> >> time back, to get dlw-g122 e running >> >> (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D27123). >> >> >> >> However, I am somewhat successful in getting the dongle recognized >> >> by if_run.ko, though not to work as I would like to: >> >> >> >> dmesg gives then >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> ugen0.3: at usbus0 >> >> run0: on >> >> usbus0 run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 (MIMO 1T1R), >> >> address b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec ieee80211_load_module: load the >> >> wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: >> >> b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded >> >> ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. >> >> wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec >> >> I have no explanation for the multiple occurrences, I have been >> >> trying for some time now, though. >> >> >> >> Was wlan_amrr compiled into kernel? > > Nope, using the module. BTW, loading the if_run module gives > > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > > Did exactly that, i.e., loaded the wlam_amrr by hand. Do you think I > might fare better by using in-kernel drivers instead of modules? > > >> >> >> >> sudo ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev run0 wlanmode hostap >> >> sudo ifconfig wlan0 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid >> >> bsdap channel - >> >> >> >> If you want to use WPA, you need to run >> # /etc/rc.d/hostapd onestart > > Amongst other things, I also did that. > >> >> > OK, update on the situation: I can get wlan to work in AP-mode, I >> > must not enable WPA, though. Having enabled hostapd for one time >> > kills my wlan and requires a complete reboot. >> > >> >> Did it panic? Can you post back trace? > > > No, it did not panic. After trying to enable wpa, the systems becomes > very sluggish on the network side and recovers upon pulling the dongle. > I interpret that as some kind of crashing the driver. > > I would be happy to provide a back trace, I do not know how, > though. Where do I need to look to learn that? > > Thanks and cheers, Christopher > > I saw you have submitted PR. I have replied to it. Please check that out. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D167847 AK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 03:45:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE63106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 03:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from santacruzbiotechnology@scbt.com) Received: from scbt.com (mail.scbt.com [64.166.169.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286958FC1E for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 03:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.14] (HELO localhost) by scbt.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.15) with ESMTP id 97109827 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:45:25 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: From: Santa Cruz Biotechnology Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:45:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Combat Flies with Santa Cruz Products X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 03:45:32 -0000 Are you having trouble viewing this e-mail? [1]Click here to view it from our website. To ensure that you continue receiving emails from us, please add [2]santacruzbiotechnology@scbt.com to your e-mail address book. [3][USEMAP:20120514_fly_email.jpg] Copyright © 2012 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and the Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. logo are registered trademarks of Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All content contained in this website is property of Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and may be used only with the expressed written permission of Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All rights reserved. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. is located at 2145 Delaware Avenue, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA Email: [4]webmaster@scbt.com If you desire to not receive our e-mail bulletins at freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, simply [5]unsubscribe or forward this email message to webmaster@scbt.com. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. References 1. http://www.scbt.com/emails/broadcast.php?lang=en&promo=fly_20120514&url=ah_fly.html 2. mailto:santacruzbiotechnology@scbt.com 3. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/tmp/tmplkfe0C.html#ah 4. mailto:webmaster@scbt.com 5. http://www.scbt.com/email_bulletin.php?eid=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 04:59:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1FC106566C for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 04:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp2.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA858FC18 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 04:59:10 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=rkgxjMBYhgowM3sfH/RQsg+jECNF8WDRFC1Y2qIyHaM= c=1 sm=0 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=1yOmCHL0AAAA:8 a=29sdinL9AAAA:8 a=kNO2uMKOAAAA:8 a=nxVJQjG3AAAA:8 a=aYqPRBLHAAAA:8 a=SN5SXGIBAAAA:8 a=ke4vmIIgAAAA:8 a=fQveQ9k2rQJXqlW1ng4A:9 a=7jtYzYXvKrdDW8QpV3oA:7 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:53660] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id E0/70-21955-71433BF4; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:59:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 00:59:03 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: This does look strange X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 04:59:11 -0000 >From Bernt Hansson : > After a reinstall of winxp, yes I know but the games. > I have a fat32 slice/partition/postcard whatever it's called. > Mocking me with: > testbox# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4 > ** /dev/ad4 > Invalid signature in fsinfo block > Fix? yes > fsck: /dev/ad4: Floating point exception: 8 > testbox# > I've almost expected Haha > Anyone know what to do, is there a msdosfs fsck? Yes there is! I missed this thread from webmail interface, but just found it. It's in FreeDOS (http://www.freedos.org/) and is part of the new FreeDOS 1.1; was also in FreeDOS 1.0: Files in C:\FDOS\BIN having names beginning with D are /dosc/fdos/bin/debug.com /dosc/fdos/bin/defrag.exe /dosc/fdos/bin/defrag.hlp /dosc/fdos/bin/deltree.com /dosc/fdos/bin/devload.com /dosc/fdos/bin/dhcp.exe /dosc/fdos/bin/disk_sim.cfg /dosc/fdos/bin/diskcomp.com /dosc/fdos/bin/diskcopy.exe /dosc/fdos/bin/display.exe /dosc/fdos/bin/dnstest.exe /dosc/fdos/bin/dosfsck.exe /dosc/fdos/bin/doslfn.com /dosc/fdos/bin/dosshell.exe /dosc/fdos/bin/dosshell.ini /dosc/fdos/bin/drvon.com /dosc/fdos/bin/du.exe I am not in FreeDOS as I put this message together! Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 05:22:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64BF1065675 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E6E8FC08 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:22:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 26409213 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:22:18 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4G4MIxB057911 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:22:18 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4G4MIxl057910 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:22:18 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:22:18 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120516042218.GA57757@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: FreeBSD on the ASUS P8H67-M LGA1155 H67 motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:22:28 -0000 Colleagues, Do you have success stories running FreeBSD on an ASUS P8H67-M LGA1155 H67 motherboard? This will be mostly a desktop system on 9.0-RELEASE. I am worried especially about the Sandy Bridge video, shall I be able to use it with xorg at least in VESA modes? Do also the sound/NIC/etc drivers work well with this motherboard? TIA. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 05:50:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017AE106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6327D8FC12 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4G5odVK026885 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:50:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4G5odZH026882 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:50:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:50:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120516021106.086061065670@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <20120516021106.086061065670@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 16 May 2012 07:50:39 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: let's work together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:50:45 -0000 Sorry for OT it is funny that such cheat-companies are so common in Poland, advertise a lot not even understanding what they are talking about. The funny part is that potential clients believe in this trash instead of simply .... use google and type "webpage promotion", "google rank" etc.. etc.. or equivalent in polish. Anyone that can do it would at first promote him/herself. >From my practice doing static webpage using standard HTML, filling keyworks, titles and description properly and using HTML tags like H1,H2 .. properly, and having only one URL to display single contents is just enough and result in best google rankings. Badly designed webpages cannot be promoted. > My name is Brooke Black and I would really love to tell > you how docs.freebsd.org can rank even better in Google. > > I'm a SEO expert working at Instant Traffic and while doing > a research for some of my colleagues I found your email address and > decided to contact you immediately. > > If you are interested I will be happy to send the additional information > and all the details needed to make it happen. > > Thanks a lot, > > Brooke > instantraffic.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 05:53:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FC1106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from B39617@freescale.com) Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA6F8FC15 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail14-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.249) by TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.9.40.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:22 +0000 Received: from mail14-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail14-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF02C60969 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:22 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: 0 X-BigFish: VS0(z21eIzc85fhzz1202hzzd0f34h8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3hd25hbe9i34h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI Received: from mail14-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail14-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1337147600919605_15481; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.239]) by mail14-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C161E04AA for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by TX2EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (10.9.99.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:18 +0000 Received: from 039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net ([169.254.8.185]) by 039-SN1MMR1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net ([10.84.1.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:53:23 -0500 From: Agarwal Rohit-B39617 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: 5.2.11. Tunnel Mode Fragmentation.zip Thread-Index: AQHNBwyxeJ3rWV/6T4CsjeY5GTA6WJaHhu1AgES6XgA= Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:22 +0000 Message-ID: <88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BD1D8@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.232.85.112] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BD1D8039SN1MPN1006039d_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FW: 5.2.11. Tunnel Mode Fragmentation.zip X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:53:30 -0000 --_004_88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BD1D8039SN1MPN1006039d_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Trying to execute IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2 Interoperability Test Scenario I= psec test cases 5.2.11 Issue:- FreeBSD 7.4 not sending icmpv6 too big message Please check the updated setup & pcap. Regards, Rohit --_004_88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BD1D8039SN1MPN1006039d_-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 05:57:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CA91065672 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from B39617@freescale.com) Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821CD8FC22 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail59-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.241) by CH1EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.43.70.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:02 +0000 Received: from mail59-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail59-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24151A04BF for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:02 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: 1 X-BigFish: VS1(zzc85fhzz1202hzzd0f34h8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3hd25hbe9i34h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI Received: from mail59-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail59-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1337147821663682_14914; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS030.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.236]) by mail59-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6A6604CC for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by CH1EHSMHS030.bigfish.com (10.43.70.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:01 +0000 Received: from 039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net ([169.254.8.185]) by 039-SN1MMR1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net ([10.84.1.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:57:06 -0500 From: Agarwal Rohit-B39617 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: Interoperability:-Tunnel mode between two SGWs, ESP=3DES-CBC HMAC-SHA-256 Thread-Index: Ac0uogEDJuvkEYbhSeCrvBlohTAa2QAABX7AASGIl/A= Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:06 +0000 Message-ID: <88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BE1EF@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.232.85.112] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BE1EF039SN1MPN1006039d_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FW: Interoperability:-Tunnel mode between two SGWs, ESP=3DES-CBC HMAC-SHA-256 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:57:16 -0000 --_004_88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BE1EF039SN1MPN1006039d_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Following interoperability is failing:- IPv6 Ready Logo, Phase-2 Interoperability Test Scenario Ipsec -Test cases 5= .2.12 is failing with FreeBSD. Observation:-Freebsd 7.4 uses HMAC-SHA-256-96 Algorithm and SGW1 are using = HMAC-SHA-256-128 Algorithm due to this interoperability is failing. Did Freebsd 7.4 supports HMAC-SHA-256-128 ? Purpose: Interoperability:-Tunnel mode between two SGWs, ESP=3D3DES-CBC HMAC-SHA-256 Setup:- H1---net0-----------SGW1-------net1------Router-------net2-------SGW2(freeb= sd)---net3-----------H2 Net0 (2001::/64) Net1 (2004::/64) Net2 (2002::/64) Net3 (2003::/64) Please find the attached zip folder. Regards, Rohit --_004_88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BE1EF039SN1MPN1006039d_-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 06:18:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604C5106564A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from B39617@freescale.com) Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DA18FC12 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail18-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.243) by DB3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.3.84.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:10 +0000 Received: from mail18-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E624642087B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:10 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: 1 X-BigFish: VS1(zzc85fhzz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3hd25hbe9i) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI Received: from mail18-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1337147288880026_16072; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB3EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.239]) by mail18-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B2E4C008D for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by DB3EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (10.3.87.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:08 +0000 Received: from 039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net ([169.254.8.185]) by 039-SN1MMR1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net ([10.84.1.16]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:48:13 -0500 From: Agarwal Rohit-B39617 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: Did Freebsd 7.4 supports HMAC-SHA-256-128 Thread-Index: Ac0zJ3jEuUQZ/D8zS1+vDCKH3b/lMQ== Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:13 +0000 Message-ID: <88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BD1C4@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.232.85.112] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Did Freebsd 7.4 supports HMAC-SHA-256-128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:18:39 -0000 Hi, Following interoperability is failing:- IPv6 Ready Logo, Phase-2 Interoperability Test Scenario Ipsec -Test cases 5= .2.12 is failing with FreeBSD. Observation:-Freebsd 7.4 uses HMAC-SHA-256-96 Algorithm and SGW1 are using = HMAC-SHA-256-128 Algorithm due to this interoperability is failing. Did Freebsd 7.4 supports HMAC-SHA-256-128 ? Purpose: Interoperability:-Tunnel mode between two SGWs, ESP=3D3DES-CBC HMAC-SHA-256 Setup:- H1---net0-----------SGW1-------net1------Router-------net2-------SGW2(freeb= sd)---net3-----------H2 Net0 (2001::/64) Net1 (2004::/64) Net2 (2002::/64) Net3 (2003::/64) Please find the attached zip folder. Regards, Rohit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 06:27:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658D21065674 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E74798FC08 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71751 invoked by uid 110); 16 May 2012 06:20:49 -0000 Received: from ool-4571afe7.dyn.optonline.net (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@69.113.175.231) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 16 May 2012 06:20:49 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:20:47 -0400 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20120516062731.658D21065674@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: PHP 5.3 + ZendGuard Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:27:31 -0000 Hello, I found a couple of threads on the web about this but no solution. Am I the only one of few people who needs to run PHP scripts on FreeBSD machine that were encoded with Zend Guard technology? trying to run linux version of PHP, which has a ZendGuard loader made for it, or worse linux version of Apache which loads linux PHP module on FreeBSD is the last thing I want to do. It would be easier to switch to linux altogether, which I'm trying to avoid at all costs. Has anyone found a solution less of switching to linux for the purpose described above? Is there anything FreeBSD community can do to influence Zend Guard developers to release Zend Guard loader for FreeBSD? The company I work for has already at least a few clients who are forcing me to switch them to Linux due to lack of Zend Guard support under FreeBSD. Any thoughts, comments, would be appreciated. Thank you! Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 06:41:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA92D106566C for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219178FC15 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedlingblack-earthcouk.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4G6fCKL015443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4G6fCKL015443 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4G6fCKL015443; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedlingblack-earthcouk.local Message-ID: <4FB34BFE.1060005@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:41:02 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Agarwal Rohit-B39617 References: <88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BD1D8@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> In-Reply-To: <88A1E39CD2946D4ABC073E2F00773AF15BD1D8@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF5A3D6C4370F07C8C14ED2FC" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FW: 5.2.11. Tunnel Mode Fragmentation.zip X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF5A3D6C4370F07C8C14ED2FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/05/2012 07:53, Agarwal Rohit-B39617 wrote: > Trying to execute IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2 Interoperability Test Scenar= io Ipsec test cases 5.2.11 >=20 > Issue:- > FreeBSD 7.4 not sending icmpv6 too big message > Please check the updated setup & pcap. Your attachments aren't making it through to the list -- the vast majority of non-text attachments are stripped by mailman. Best thing to do is stick your debug output on a site like pastebin and post a link. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigF5A3D6C4370F07C8C14ED2FC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+zTAYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyu9wCfdtCdoDcNl13Dm/KM94tcWlSM ftgAmgL3cWHCVFql+0b0Odp/f+VnOCUE =N+LM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF5A3D6C4370F07C8C14ED2FC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 06:41:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D381065670 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9898FC16 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4G6fGLJ027133; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:41:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4G6fG49027130; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:41:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:41:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Simon In-Reply-To: <20120516062731.658D21065674@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <20120516062731.658D21065674@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 16 May 2012 08:41:16 +0200 (CEST) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: PHP 5.3 + ZendGuard Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:22 -0000 > Am I the only one of few people who needs to run PHP scripts on FreeBSD machine > that were encoded with Zend Guard technology? trying to run linux version of probably not, no idea EXACTLY what zend guard is but i've seen other such standards of encoding==obfuscating PHP sources. I don't provide services like hosting for anyone, while i do support businesses and run their servers, and if anyone offer his/her software in such form i (which happened) i just say NO at least, preferably kicking ass. Don't believe in "i use it because i don't my code i worked hard on it to be copied by others" which actually mean "I am simple thief and i copied almost everything and not even modified it much as i don't understand it at all, so i use encoder/obfuscator to hide it". Allowing any software without proper source and preferably documentation in any business always ends badly. So really - if you provide hosting service just run linux for that case, on VM, and probably charge a bit more for that, or leave such case to competition to handle. in every other case just say no. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 06:43:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31011065672 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551208FC26 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4G6gve0027149; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:42:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4G6gvAX027146; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:42:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:42:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: fake fake In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 16 May 2012 08:42:57 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:43:03 -0000 > I need a sort of file permission template. > Under some particular directory (like ~/secret), I need all those > files (including newly creating one) mode 700. > Is there any template-trick? Or "chmod -R 700" every time? umask when creating files there. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 06:44:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8C7106567A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB878FC24 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4G6i7cg027172; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:44:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4G6i6DE027169; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:44:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:44:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: fake fake In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 16 May 2012 08:44:07 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Michael Sierchio , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:44:13 -0000 > Thanks. But I need specific directory only. > umask way seems to set mode not only under ~/secret but other > directories like ~/public. > Is there any elegant way? elegant way is just to chmod 700 ~/secret and do not do anything more, as files under ~/secret are already inaccessible too for others and group. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 07:13:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C691065673 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp1.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396478FC15 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:13:16 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=aHSCumbQHUifGKLc3bawIpl4HjRCT32YeB0tjLLtu2Q= c=1 sm=0 a=F3fr6IO9xwAA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=5O2ldFK7dLbfybxSBmMA:9 a=zJgV2U0bv_mjy4-en7oA:7 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp02.insight.synacor.com header.from=t.mueller1@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp02.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:55950] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id DD/14-09467-68353BF4; Wed, 16 May 2012 03:13:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 03:13:10 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:13:17 -0000 > > Better to "make buildkernel" and "make installkernel" as two > > separate steps, rather than "make kernel"? > Yes. You only need to "make buildkernel" once, then "make installkernel" > for both $DESTDIRs. The idea was to "make buildkernel" once and "make buildworld" once and install to two different DESTDIRs. > > After rebooting single-user, do "mergemaster -p", > > then "mergemaster -p -D /mnt", and then "make installworld" and > > immediately following that, "make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt" ? > Refer to the commend header in /usr/src/Makefile for the > correct procedure. Without having it tested, the following > commands in SUM (after you have successfully installed the > new kernels) should work as intended: > # merpemaster -p > # make installworld > # make delete-old > # mergemaster > # merpemaster -p -D /mnt > # make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt > # make delete-old DESTDIR=/mnt > # mergemaster -D /mnt > # reboot > Also see the comment regarding "make delete-old-libs" to be > applied after reboot correspondingly. I assume your "merpemaster" is a typo for "mergemaster"? I would have done each step for main installation and then for USB stick (DESTDIR=/mnt) before going to the next step, or maybe that doesn't really matter? I think the second "mergemaster" was supposed to be done before "make delete-old", or maybe that doesn't really matter either? > > I installed to USB stick only after fully upgrading on main > > installation, finally copied /boot/kernel directory, and that > > USB stick is now bootable. So now I know how to make a USB > > stick bootable with GPT. > Maybe kernel modules for GPT have been missing? Check /etc/src.conf > for any strange settings, see "man 3 src.conf" for details. You > can use this file to customize and "tweak" your builds. I think I must have all GPT modules there; I have no trouble accessing hard-disk partitions, and USB stick when partitioned GPT. I might want to prevent building ulpt module because of hplip and HP 1212nf MFP printer idiosyncrasies, though that may or may not make any difference. I could also prevent building other modules that would not be used. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 07:27:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC65106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahdieh.salamat@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E918FC1E for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so649499dad.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:27:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LgVNiaOjZIi2qiQ2u4w+Cign23UZno41iGT+YK0w07E=; b=HWZjYHw8t8JMlMB1lAfViQq82XNphPK4dArhoGZ4g+t9eOCCo5hgZRXhZeXtlVMEEC 8XljX04Bifbul1F0FsgJ0UBGvmcqRoGdjkZmh4IaaWyoJ0o8ddC4EZFdigXVBjvUo6Ul ea2B3r4IggMbi1QqAauHOsxX6yB/iX6siARmCu/OKEoM/TI2IUqhYLl3C6K3Kkc4GGUU uw+aucBb9uoGtRqADo3LnR8hdYxqbtDgcjnPy0DKqCO+K8QTmQAyMiOfsBoYHVBH3rev SJfo9LYSZjKC6IDwPDkpfXPA4fAxwdvGm6HiVJnfaPDS+x6ST6EJ0jD0KsOJArmgNY36 IztQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.217.67 with SMTP id ow3mr13104838pbc.16.1337153227854; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.237.199 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 00:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 00:27:07 -0700 Message-ID: From: mahdieh salamat To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: disable console messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:27:08 -0000 hi all. how I can disbale console messages and clear screen on boot? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 08:59:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0CF106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venkatduvvuru.ml@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584168FC16 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so560772ggn.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 01:59:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tjiofjCtQGnxvSR/Fax3TuJvPKVlP/UFOIRpuVK9NeA=; b=nbh84gar1bR7RiiW7nDHV2muuFiqgEeqqtgepuy9g3mnrN2koC57UXeUsRgS37I8qV eNeZNTVCSjwBSG+MXh5GI0ZtAzh9hWKc3IgJYUGdjGJEJHe6ytK8FyMBXoJnfp1UFEEd bQfjR+xAcISsHifJAaFTKeaBrg9BxS3Q95mQlhGEu9sMLI4yl4L0sBdY19d95bhcmrY4 Zvy4bwD5L7Oc56z2dvadyI+nOummWJW0CHuafQfgndTA8W7XTbtI63sxztgLohqxvyqD Pf5KUC7LocmyeEUGfJO9oGVGBqmX0cFV4XYwqbg3461SGODA2b7X9UikaG5NWFp6zr/K fgEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.186.162 with SMTP id fl2mr9405582igc.56.1337158782308; Wed, 16 May 2012 01:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.30.227 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 01:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:29:42 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Duvvuru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: IPv6 flow id hash calculation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:59:49 -0000 Folks, This question is related to the hash calculation done as part of selecting the transmit queue for IPv6 traffic. I observed that no matter how many queues you use in the driver, the tx traffic is always coming on queue 0. Did anybody else observed this behaviour? and is that how it is in freebsd? Note: IPv4 traffic is coming on all the tx queues. Please clarify. /Venkat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 10:57:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41156106566C for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 10:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hasanhasanli@mail.ru) Received: from fallback5.mail.ru (fallback5.mail.ru [94.100.176.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB748FC0A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 10:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f265.mail.ru (f265.mail.ru [217.69.128.186]) by fallback5.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id C293BA35656E for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:56:57 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Message-Id:Content-Type:Reply-To:Date:Mime-Version:To:From; bh=5vR+jG4fC9EXOeDvyZ+Z8iEHedgvFED9f+S6UnkRM4o=; b=Whi4yAUsm2gLAq41cu8aWJTP+miteKWoZEcqA1cIoAPOdiZa3EDlZr1UDsrqYeOS4Yp9n60YsEcRIM6Cs7ASoVzIj3XxQLR0BCw3fDDsDS0Qb+K+HOM46wzQhHb71Z9X; Received: from mail by f265.mail.ru with local (envelope-from ) id 1SUbuT-0003XI-Lg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:56:49 +0400 Received: from [85.132.24.46] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:56:49 +0400 From: =?UTF-8?B?aGFzYW5oYXNhbmxpIEhhc2Fu?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [85.132.24.46] Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:56:49 +0400 X-Priority: Message-Id: X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:19:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?aGFzYW5oYXNhbmxpIEhhc2Fu?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:57:05 -0000 SSBib3VnaHQgc2VydmVywqAgSFAgUHJvTGlhbnQgQkw0NjBjIEc3LiBJIGNvdWxkbid0IGZpbmQg RXRoZXJuZXQgZHJpdmVyIGZvciB0aGUgRnJlZUJTRC4gCgpEb2VzwqBhbnlvbmUga25vdyB3aGVy ZSBjYW4gSSBnZXQgZHJpdmVyIGZvciBteSBPcGVuQlNEKG9yIGZyZWVCU0QpIHNlcnZlciA/CgpC ZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMgClNoYWhpbiBIYXNhbm92CgoKCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 11:39:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138A0106566C for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966868FC1D for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so178922eab.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=6/bjPuNgbMEcGigDX8OpkuVPSB+sIF7JkMpMWR2ydTk=; b=Amwbi92dLzFD9IN51Pv3Iy61zjOIFjiV17n5s+fCYoEGd1/oQd0+EQLeoBamee4YKr vwu0jTYn7y5kAbclh5DETwmMIWygga/urWoyb+DmlLpYXANCHbB+ACjwDb8TLrbZzEfN BhTcy7CWl1XDublcDXA2HtK+doRfOKeFdN0crWVM1y1JGoMO297rz8LRPTEj26nrWQOu ztfiEmN9kXJzYpgOwlqGMqCblwVK5ZCT/q0FRx4GTE1gdfe+VOvbpzvADBOOw7I6PpIy VGGt2t3QH9Nethc/5fbyJUdgbLmSL+7eWpJERtTE+HsFQzkaUQ0SJEE/r+J3kVzQI8cB LopA== Received: by 10.14.53.69 with SMTP id f45mr503374eec.87.1337168386114; Wed, 16 May 2012 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.16.197 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 04:39:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:39:05 +0300 Message-ID: To: hasanhasanli Hasan Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=90e6ba6150dea8c40704c025c63b X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:39:53 -0000 --90e6ba6150dea8c40704c025c63b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:56 PM, hasanhasanli Hasan wrote: > I bought server HP ProLiant BL460c G7. I couldn't find Ethernet driver > for the FreeBSD. > > Does anyone know where can I get driver for my OpenBSD(or freeBSD) server ? > > Best regards > Shahin Hasanov > > Which version of FreeBSD did you install? What is the output of the command `ifconfig` ? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email. --90e6ba6150dea8c40704c025c63b-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 12:01:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0968106567D for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hasanhasanli@mail.ru) Received: from fallback1.mail.ru (fallback1.mail.ru [94.100.176.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E472E8FC1E for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f121.mail.ru (f121.mail.ru [217.69.128.80]) by fallback1.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 4149048C3E9 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 15:29:13 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Message-Id:Content-Type:Reply-To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:From; bh=lbIGRW49rhqmZqYzzZv5SeEA5gMcPDZVd/5FoQmz4+A=; b=qZBrV+3/D2fTLEdrnRP8b7TDutf+HU13e5llbJQXANVzXQ9ttAaTkFjabYU7wWlP1uFb2w73V3OiL0FiBO9EQLDiTgM0lWJhw1s7qiTkGwg3DbCMqQerX1EOmgEA6kwW; Received: from mail by f121.mail.ru with local (envelope-from ) id 1SUcPh-0002Lb-N9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 15:29:05 +0400 Received: from [85.132.24.46] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 15:29:05 +0400 From: =?UTF-8?B?aGFzYW5oYXNhbmxpIEhhc2Fu?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [85.132.24.46] Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:29:05 +0400 X-Priority: Message-Id: X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Ethernet driver HP ProLiant BL460c G7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?aGFzYW5oYXNhbmxpIEhhc2Fu?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:01:06 -0000 SSBib3VnaHQgc2VydmVyIEhQIFByb0xpYW50IEJMNDYwYyBHNy4gSSBjb3VsZG4ndCBmaW5kIEV0 aGVybmV0IGRyaXZlciBmb3IgdGhlIEZyZWVCU0QuIAoKRG9lcyBhbnlvbmUga25vdyB3aGVyZSBj YW4gSSBnZXQgZHJpdmVyIGZvciBteSBPcGVuQlNEKG9yIGZyZWVCU0QpIHNlcnZlciA/CgpCZXN0 IHJlZ2FyZHMgClNoYWhpbiBIYXNhbm92CgoKCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 12:38:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC97106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:38:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00DD8FC16 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2A23CBE2; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:38:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4GCcmdE001947; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:38:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:38:48 +0200 From: Polytropon To: hasanhasanli Hasan Message-Id: <20120516143848.4b6117b3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ethernet driver HP ProLiant BL460c G7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:38:56 -0000 On Wed, 16 May 2012 15:29:05 +0400, hasanhasanli Hasan wrote: > I bought server HP ProLiant BL460c G7. I couldn't find Ethernet > driver for the FreeBSD. > > Does anyone know where can I get driver for my OpenBSD(or freeBSD) server ? You shouldn't need to "get a driver" because it's the operating system's job to provide the drivers. FreeBSD comes with lots of drivers for Ethernet cards. After booting the machine with a FreeBSD system (or even after installing it), try # ifconfig -a and look for which Ethernet interfaces have been success- fully created. Missing something? Compare to the hardware specification which lists the kinds of installed network hardware (should be in your documentation provided with the server). Check those lists: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/hardware.html#ETHERNET http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/support.html#ETHERNET You can always use "man " to find out more about drivers on an installed system, or you can use the hyperlinks in that lists to access the online documentation of the drivers. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 12:54:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DEB1065672 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8130D8FC0C for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F293DEF6; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:54:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4GCsaPD002024; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:54:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:54:36 +0200 From: Polytropon To: mahdieh salamat Message-Id: <20120516145436.84794137.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disable console messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:54:37 -0000 On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:27:07 -0700, mahdieh salamat wrote: > hi all. how I can disbale console messages and clear screen on boot? > Thanks The console messages can be suppressed by commenting out the line *.err;kern.warning;auth.notice;mail.crit /dev/console in /etc/syslog.conf; if you want the messages redirected to a file (instead of the screen), just provide a different target, such as *.err;kern.*;auth.notice;mail.crit;console.info /var/log/console.log Make sure /var/log/console.log does exist: run # touch /var/log/console.log There are more useful examples in that file. See "man 5 syslog.conf" for details. To also silence the kernel, you could add boot_mute="YES" or (and?) consolse="nullconsole" to /boot/loader.conf. See "man 8 loader" and "man 5 loader.conf" and "less /boot/defaults/loader.conf" for details. Finally: Add the command "clear" or "/usr/bin/tput clear" at the end of the /etc/rc script (not very clean, but works). A quick web search brings up some inspiration: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-October/022911.html http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10341 http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=58256#post58256 You'll find a suggestion there on how to avoid fiddling with the /etc/rc boot script (which should stay untouched due to many reasons). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 13:10:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EBB1065742 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972778FC17 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:10:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 15:00:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4FB3A4F2.6050107@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:00:34 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120516143848.4b6117b3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120516143848.4b6117b3.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Ethernet driver HP ProLiant BL460c G7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:10:55 -0000 On 05/16/2012 02:38 PM, Polytropon wrote: > HP ProLiant BL460c G7 Maybe this helps http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=24769 Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 13:37:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C083106564A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ramirocaso05@yahoo.com.ar) Received: from nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A2ED8FC0A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.50] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 May 2012 13:37:48 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.130] by tm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 May 2012 13:37:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp217.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 May 2012 13:37:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.ar; s=s1024; t=1337175468; bh=Uxfd0Mr1nfznDZ+GwDtHJ5DE5K4NYi6647I97ysSlfI=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xErDMvOyvVM20ZJvDsSkxr3FNCCJa4eSo+tAH+fAl0TgGl7EJzWnLfBuylCoujdCZgJXzHoNpDstt1kUBRakYrsolo6Ce3TjCkw0rUMFGPfbDjqr9sNmjy5x8DNlnXLK5uTo1I5bVuyyTr25IHME+kV34GeFttOcNFCc1XCrMcM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 703338.90375.bm@smtp217.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: pW4arnMVM1lGG11VlfgSqNovPVEFSD5T2hdC2pvZGBJBm67 C4kauyLeRtalwoHv2FHQrjipBKaQq4OhSnY7x72CHTaMbVuNZdom3uqSUBGP RyirjxB.ssAXqs_eioOibZiq7cPtYyYF5yrzNEGTTVh7wpXRAEW78CZibG6V 81n7J9ik7vV1eWeAtYzXOGk1XPd9umfQq20NetzNqfgyeFNaS.fLYlXBR_6d VOm8zl1n79yFE2Lp5bL.7woFqOFVUD9LnPC2A1mRAuVgWQh8TWFaS58qp6KT 5LG2aazXIct039pNcW8If4MiVRwhGtZpBEG7VeE_Nx.Qt66s0TcL_PgDENXe s7lbNaqBQhB7j69D9exLHmfA4SoT0lyT0UuG4ZEEPrh9AjOZ4wQjM_8bQ1Bc cPIv7un4w7l73M6cT6ZCcs5vwXEIq8cjqODXj X-Yahoo-SMTP: nvs2XB.swBAGTflg2_BV8MKeFlUrIJyEuA-- Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ramirocaso05@186.22.171.89 with plain) by smtp217.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2012 06:37:48 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <4FB3ADA9.6060501@yahoo.com.ar> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:37:45 -0300 From: Ramiro Caso User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:47:20 +0000 Subject: (mutt +) msmtp problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:37:55 -0000 I use mutt (1.5.21) with msmtp (1.4.28) as MDA. Usually, everything goes smoothly, but every once in a while I lose network connectivity when sending email (I don't recall whether there is a correlation between this problem and my trying to send not-so-big but yet around 1mb files). Basically, what happens in trying to send an email is: May 16 10:01:17 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=**:**:**:**:**:** reason=0 ....... May 16 10:02:27 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to **:**:**:**:**:** completed (reauth) [id=0 id_str=] ....... Then I try again, and the same thing happens. All msmtp's log shows is: errormsg='cannot write to TLS connection: Pipe Broken' exitcode=EX_IOERR Any ideas? Best, Ramiro From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 14:04:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4EC1065674 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jedwards@bsdftw.org) Received: from mail.bsdftw.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:c630:3000::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88468FC19 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.bsdftw.org (websrv [IPv6:2001:470:c630:1000::]) by mail.bsdftw.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A197CAE12; Wed, 16 May 2012 10:04:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 66.147.92.218 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jedwards) by webmail.bsdftw.org with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 10:04:56 -0400 Message-ID: <9407d3f053a5b149c1cbd5d41d9777f1.squirrel@webmail.bsdftw.org> In-Reply-To: <4FB3ADA9.6060501@yahoo.com.ar> References: <4FB3ADA9.6060501@yahoo.com.ar> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:04:56 -0400 From: "James Edwards" To: "Ramiro Caso" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (mutt +) msmtp problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:04:57 -0000 > I use mutt (1.5.21) with msmtp (1.4.28) as MDA. Usually, everything goes > smoothly, but every once in a while I lose network connectivity when > sending email (I don't recall whether there is a correlation between > this problem and my trying to send not-so-big but yet around 1mb files). > > Basically, what happens in trying to send an email is: > > May 16 10:01:17 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED > bssid=**:**:**:**:**:** reason=0 > ....... > May 16 10:02:27 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - > Connection to **:**:**:**:**:** completed (reauth) [id=0 id_str=] > ....... > > Then I try again, and the same thing happens. All msmtp's log shows is: > > errormsg='cannot write to TLS connection: Pipe Broken' exitcode=EX_IOERR > > Any ideas? > > Best, > Ramiro Based on above, mutt and msmpt *appear* to be fine, but this seems to be a problem with the wireless driver, card, or router - you are being disconnected from the network, which in turn is causing the 'broken pipe'. You could feasibly work around it by using a wired connection, or take a look at what is going on with your wireless. -- Regards, James Edwards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 14:17:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5691065674 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3EE8FC0A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248EE3DC37; Wed, 16 May 2012 16:17:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4GEH0EB001891; Wed, 16 May 2012 16:17:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:17:00 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-Id: <20120516161700.301fd26c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:17:03 -0000 On Wed, 16 May 2012 03:13:10 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > Better to "make buildkernel" and "make installkernel" as two > > > separate steps, rather than "make kernel"? > > > Yes. You only need to "make buildkernel" once, then "make installkernel" > > for both $DESTDIRs. > > The idea was to "make buildkernel" once and "make buildworld" once > and install to two different DESTDIRs. I'm not sure I understand: The two install* targets ("make installkernel" and "make installworld") are only able to install to _one_ location, which is the _default_ location *or* the location pointed to by DESTDIR. It is not possible to perform _one_ install step which will cause results in _two_ locations (without any means of "hidden duplication", e. g. by using a mirroring technique). > > > After rebooting single-user, do "mergemaster -p", > > > then "mergemaster -p -D /mnt", and then "make installworld" and > > > immediately following that, "make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt" ? > > > Refer to the commend header in /usr/src/Makefile for the > > correct procedure. Without having it tested, the following > > commands in SUM (after you have successfully installed the > > new kernels) should work as intended: > > > # merpemaster -p > > # make installworld > > # make delete-old > > # mergemaster > > > # merpemaster -p -D /mnt > > # make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt > > # make delete-old DESTDIR=/mnt > > # mergemaster -D /mnt > > > # reboot > > > Also see the comment regarding "make delete-old-libs" to be > > applied after reboot correspondingly. > > I assume your "merpemaster" is a typo for "mergemaster"? Ah yes, the well-known "P next to G typing error", procreated by copy & paste. :-) > I would have done each step for main installation and then for > USB stick (DESTDIR=/mnt) before going to the next step, or > maybe that doesn't really matter? The order of targets does not matter. However, the order of steps _per_ target does matter (e. g. "make installkernel" first, _then_ "installworld" - it matters as soon as you boot). > I think the second "mergemaster" was supposed to be done > before "make delete-old", or maybe that doesn't really matter > either? I'm refering to the instructions presented in /usr/src/Makefile: # For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a # delta of a few days): # # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). # 2. `make buildworld' # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). # 6. `mergemaster -p' # 7. `make installworld' # 8. `make delete-old' # 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). # 10. `reboot' # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) That means: "mergemaster -p" before installing world, "mergemaster" (maybe with additional options) after installing world. I think the delete-old and delete-old-libs steps can also be performed at the end of the whole process. But doing what the instructions say has always been the most comfortable way of avoiding trouble. :-) > > > I installed to USB stick only after fully upgrading on main > > > installation, finally copied /boot/kernel directory, and that > > > USB stick is now bootable. So now I know how to make a USB > > > stick bootable with GPT. > > > Maybe kernel modules for GPT have been missing? Check /etc/src.conf > > for any strange settings, see "man 3 src.conf" for details. You > > can use this file to customize and "tweak" your builds. > > I think I must have all GPT modules there; I have no trouble > accessing hard-disk partitions, and USB stick when partitioned GPT. > > I might want to prevent building ulpt module because of hplip > and HP 1212nf MFP printer idiosyncrasies, though that may or > may not make any difference. > > I could also prevent building other modules that would not be used. There are several means you can use for this: a custom kernel configuration, settings in /etc/src.conf, settings in /boot/loader.conf. It should not _require_ you to deal with a custom kernel if you want to avoid that. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 15:21:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDF91065670 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 15:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ramirocaso08@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E448FC16 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 15:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so1024051ggn.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+FRc8w7xy9wU9uj405zJPH+39tb5uee+5iN9zzHNIjY=; b=LbEzzWgGaR8m7rdLVwAQqDn36+XGNAk8qbrf1QfaqAuh0xavlBnUkefTm0oMjFgMdQ ioac147hjiQ8aOpnYrmFwxBsodu7ggHC2wcs9NPC/qh5Yrq+UnaFxIvwxEkaPOq15TcO 1dJ2YodCFR8VctAnnl7kPEF9bLf7+h0Xaijw33HtBNTq8umT/wOGQCCLLOKEoqdGG9Yv 3L3p6fSoTPxpkN9OJzXeNOz+0Q8Y1yJHfh2PSiU0MZWxW/0x9abFWzOXfr/iMF+tji4T PGvuSuDVwNdLlNMAaC+eqLAkdeBdBfpllm5wqG/t8lcqJUJvGhHVhP6RrzPKw2dXxc3o PvJA== Received: by 10.101.73.14 with SMTP id a14mr1215707anl.12.1337181692338; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([186.22.171.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i2sm4847844anl.9.2012.05.16.08.21.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 May 2012 08:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB3C5F6.5040204@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:21:26 -0300 From: Ramiro Caso User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FB3ADA9.6060501@yahoo.com.ar> <9407d3f053a5b149c1cbd5d41d9777f1.squirrel@webmail.bsdftw.org> In-Reply-To: <9407d3f053a5b149c1cbd5d41d9777f1.squirrel@webmail.bsdftw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: (mutt +) msmtp problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:21:33 -0000 On 16/05/2012 11:04, James Edwards wrote: >> I use mutt (1.5.21) with msmtp (1.4.28) as MDA. Usually, everything goes >> smoothly, but every once in a while I lose network connectivity when >> sending email (I don't recall whether there is a correlation between >> this problem and my trying to send not-so-big but yet around 1mb files). >> >> Basically, what happens in trying to send an email is: >> >> May 16 10:01:17 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED >> bssid=**:**:**:**:**:** reason=0 >> ....... >> May 16 10:02:27 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - >> Connection to **:**:**:**:**:** completed (reauth) [id=0 id_str=] >> ....... >> >> Then I try again, and the same thing happens. All msmtp's log shows is: >> >> errormsg='cannot write to TLS connection: Pipe Broken' exitcode=EX_IOERR >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Best, >> Ramiro > > Based on above, mutt and msmpt *appear* to be fine, but this seems to be a > problem with the wireless driver, card, or router - you are being > disconnected from the network, which in turn is causing the 'broken pipe'. Indeed, mutt + msmtp appear to be fine... My bad for not being clearer... However, there is a correlation that goes beyond credible coincidence: the disconnection happens when (and, as far as I can recall, only when) I use mutt + msmtp to send sizeable files. In particular, no disconnection occurs when I'm not using mutt + msmtp, or when I use mutt + msmtp but I send emails without sizeable attachments. Also, the disconnection happens within seconds of attempting to send the sizeable emails. I guess it is a problem with the wireless card, but it seems to be somehow closely linked to the event of trying to send sizeable emails using mutt + msmtp (when I use thunderbird to send the files, everything works as expected, no disconnection). > You could feasibly work around it by using a wired connection, or take a > look at what is going on with your wireless. My work around, for now, is to use thunderbird for sending large emails, so there's no hurry. But I'm a bit puzzled about what's happening. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 18:04:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E851065670 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880F28FC08 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so1775940obc.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:04:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=UIHRLVQNQDHk0xe7/ychqaLeKURHanvY6kv8FkmXyiQ=; b=srbRiv0jIRUdtM+c43g7FxiXhX0JsvgTMzwGCK/0IwjJVurSreKTTNPgn4V209DX8r VXCe+fi6HQHinbSSfel7z8KgcailBfmBvY269Ytv60T4lvo9mKwBgZC/bvglo1pxcsrY 4VF9O9dWisUbRyhVbbqhn37yCd8XphKyQ6iDZWEcrEZUmsEXVjRLxek9IopLPhxExhcx mn5z6ftzD6h45S/2FuJz+FVGeSqQNXTlRqvpnh8rbpvH3cIO56MinEVhnB+qITWc+GY3 XLa434VkDMJscvQqUomHdXfTmF9aYOocKO13mf0KM0JFPjVW2dE6fsbc1IAYxD2sCjH/ cOcA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.136.4 with SMTP id pw4mr3719230obb.28.1337191465872; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.128.38 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:04:25 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BgL4t6eJ155b2Psz6di1P9NDG8g Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: FreeBSD 8.3 support for LSI SAS 2208 based controllers/Dell PERC 710 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:04:26 -0000 Hi All, I have a Dell R620 which utilizes the PERC H710 controller based on the LSI SAS 2208 chip. According to the hardware notes for 8.3-RELEASE, this chip is supported by the mps driver. Unfortunately, when I attempt to install 8.3-RELEASE via DVD, it does not recognize the controller and no disks are found and the install exits. The manpage indicates the driver was introduced in 9.0-RELEASE suggesting it was backported to 8.3? Would this be correct? A search for related bug reports did not return anything useful. Would anyone else out there have any experience with installing FreeBSD on the R620 and be able to provide any tips for troubleshooting? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 18:51:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8EA106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1D08FC08 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so1840044obc.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:51:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Re9tsuAW3Vo4UwwgSYl1vWXbujwx4vN9IM2iMPuV0iU=; b=Ee9Kv+Kb2+eJ1dHtAOhwNdcs4XhoDq8IX2BAVMC/Ws3l/ui+Yi1nA9vrxx4u7acu7H J53Z4zLz8V20rX6O8DdbqidV9VqrLzvCEWE5XuiYvMo8G/hla01iPRG5qU3TPHyrkqGc HC4GLCA0HAN8a41ve4qO9OHarNiM5IiCyTpRO5ZagNOK+Q0j+5Lqdf1Zz2LsOMLHwbJ6 LizMAlAOlpDBZNKjvJ1V15p/jfCx9ZRVnlCOWZJeUQCXVUOVczdJaoUkYOi8x8B7L8OD iEUtVpnkURpCfkjveKHWIOsw/W3PTUHj522FGcaF2Z4oN4IdeoCiDtbKCdc/08+Q0YR4 hOsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.37.37 with SMTP id v5mr3842299obj.51.1337194287737; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.128.38 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:51:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F609D8F.5090007@locolomo.org> References: <4F609D8F.5090007@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:51:27 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0Qsqye6aZ8PGDpL_VYL2Cu5nOxo Message-ID: From: Rick Miller Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Running OS tftp vs. pxeboot tftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:51:28 -0000 Thanks for your feedback. I agree that separating the networks and isolating the build network thus eliminating the need for VLAN tagging is the ideal scenario. Unfortunately, influencing those changes are beyond my sphere of influence in this particular case. At the end of the day, our solution was to replace pxeboot.bs with Grub2pxe. I have a blog post detailing the scenario at https://hostileadmin.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/pxe-booting-into-a-freebsd-in= stallation/ On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Erik N=F8rgaard wr= ote: > Hi > > > On 14/03/2012 11:44, Rick Miller wrote: >> >> I thought I would follow up on this as a couple individuals expressed >> an interest in it... >> >> We have isolated the configuration in which this occurs under. =A0It >> occurs during the execution of pxeboot.bs on brocade switches with >> vlan tagging enabled. > > > You might save yourself time and money buying a cheap switch and doing yo= ur > jumpstart install on a separate closed network completely isolated from t= he > rest of your networks, without VLAN tagging required. > > If you have lots of nodes to install it makes sense to maintain your own > repository of freebsd and packages, and it's good practice to keep your > preproduction systems separate from production, so there is no need for > network access. > > > BR, Erik > > -- > M: +34 666 334 818 > T: +34 915 211 157 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 19:07:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D3F106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 19:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D133A8FC15 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 19:07:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=Hen1NcXMgd531sBRCb9pEtsTIObWmEiwNokpacN/EjA=; b=a40PQklWDTGe0JaGxDI5IfhL4UwequT3zhYUpBm81l4oV45M5C0a6klCCudng8BJM7EC3pt6+CRZO+ScVWAoLHuZ6G368vJcasPvAj/+f0exE6OLx7eq/eOZrlQwmBZs; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SUjZR-000Fti-Cg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:07:38 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1337195251-3288-3287/5/9; Wed, 16 May 2012 19:07:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:07:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.3 support for LSI SAS 2208 based controllers/Dell PERC 710 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:07:39 -0000 On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:04:25 -0500, Rick Miller wrote: > > Would anyone else out there have any experience with installing > FreeBSD on the R620 and be able to provide any tips for > troubleshooting? > Does 9.0 install on that hardware? It's possible your controller chip has a slightly different revision that isn't listed in the driver. I'd expect it to not work on 9.0 either in that case. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 19:44:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C9B106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 19:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kernel@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BE48FC0A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 19:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A73550959 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 21:43:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.44] (chimea.webrz.net [10.10.10.44]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D861350936 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 21:43:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FB403B5.9010504@webrz.net> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 21:44:53 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Cc: Subject: Newsyslog | Cronjob faulty? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:44:59 -0000 At midnight (00.00) I run this cronjob from my crontab: Crontab: 00 * * * * root newsyslog For some reason this goes wrong; (if I run 'newsyslog' on any other time, there is no error message). bzip2: Can't open input file /var/log/maillog.0: No such file or directory. newsyslog: `bzip2 -f /var/log/maillog.0' terminated with a non-zero status (1) /var/log: -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 63162 May 16 21:20 maillog -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 109 May 16 00:00 maillog.0.bz2 -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 73674 May 16 00:00 maillog.1 -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 111 May 15 00:00 maillog.2.bz2 -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 73050 May 15 00:00 maillog.3 -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 109 May 14 00:00 maillog.4.bz2 -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 184042 May 14 00:00 maillog.5 Can somebody tell me what goes wrong here? On my other FreeBSD server the same cronjob goes ok... thanks, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 19:53:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C33106566B; Wed, 16 May 2012 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrapersn63@canaca.com) Received: from host-200-58-92-27.supernet.com.bo (host-200-58-92-27.supernet.com.bo [200.58.92.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E198FC0C; Wed, 16 May 2012 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 200.58.92.27 (account , HELO freebsd.org) by freebsd.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 473013871 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 15:53:25 -0400 From: , To: , Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:53:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: dkahfpzpew 97 Message-ID: <9438550297.NI9YO1BJ130884@ewqdbwpbpheayu.uibqriyz.tv> Cc: Subject: We'll pay you from $ 98 per hour for remote assistance in our clinic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:53:27 -0000 We invite you to work in the remote assistant position. This work takes 2-3 hours per week and requires absolutely no investment. The essence of this work for incoming client requests in your city. The starting salary is about 2500 EUR per month + bonuses. You get paid your salary every 2 weeks and your bonuses after fulfilling each task! We guarantee work for everyone. But we accept applications this week only! Therefore, you should write a request right now. And you will start earning money, starting from next week. Please indicate in the request: Your name: Your email address: City of residence: Please send the request to my email Emilio@eureseurope.com and I will answer you personally as soon as possible Sincerely, Emilio Owens From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 20:38:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67B51065675 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1337630917.3cec4a@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7618FC15 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4GK8cQc066250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 16:08:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1337630917.3cec4a@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q4GK8cUl066238 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 16:08:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1337630917.3cec4a@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1337630917.3cec4a@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Wed, 16 May 2012 16:08:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:08:37 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120516200837.GA63280@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: David Banning Cc: Subject: problems with networking and route command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:38:23 -0000 I am having a problem getting users who get their dhcp from my system to be able to connect to the internet. On one network interface my server can connect to the internet no problem - that's device vr0. On another, rl0 - I have a connection to the local network - no problem connecting to local machines from the server. The problem is that the local machines cannot access the internet through the FreeBSD server. Here is the output of ifconfig; fwe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 02:11:d8:b3:0e:43 ch 1 dma -1 vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 64.40.244.36 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 64.40.244.47 inet6 fe80::16d6:4dff:fe47:88ae%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 14:d6:4d:47:88:ae media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe66:7162%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 ether 00:11:95:66:71:62 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 And here is the ipv4 part output of netstat -nr # netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 64.40.244.33 UGSc 8 2365 vr0 64.40.244.32/28 link#2 UC 1 0 vr0 64.40.244.33 00:0c:42:07:26:35 UHLW 9 0 vr0 1187 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 7 61626 lo0 192.168.1 link#3 UC 4 0 rl0 192.168.1.16 link#3 UHLW 2 2032 rl0 192.168.1.40 00:1b:78:e6:c3:cc UHLW 0 31 rl0 1189 192.168.1.101 00:07:e9:b9:50:98 UHLW 4 12526 rl0 1193 192.168.1.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 3 330 rl0 It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands without success. If anyone by looking at my information can suggest a route command, or suggest a way to dig for more information on this it would be greatly appreciated. lot about this From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 20:42:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEFD1065670 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com [17.158.161.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4978FC0A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:42:29 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0M4400LFFUUJKZ60@nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:42:21 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7580,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-05-16_08:2012-05-16, 2012-05-16, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1205160244 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20120516200837.GA63280@skytracker.ca> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:42:19 -0700 Message-id: <70BC5C41-FD4F-4B57-86F8-8C48BA075EC1@mac.com> References: <20120516200837.GA63280@skytracker.ca> To: David Banning X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with networking and route command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:42:29 -0000 Hi-- On May 16, 2012, at 1:08 PM, David Banning wrote: [ ... ] > It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that > can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole > lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands > without success. You need to implement NAT on this box, since 192.168.0.0/16 is an RFC-1918 unrouteable private network range. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 21:48:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F37106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 21:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4F38FC14 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 21:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q4GLiGhH014913; Wed, 16 May 2012 17:44:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id q4GLiGrk014912; Wed, 16 May 2012 17:44:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 17:44:16 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Benjamin Kaduk Message-ID: <20120516214416.GA14804@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20120514222724.GA5158@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 21:49:00 -0000 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:51:04AM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: Hello Ben, Thank you for your response. I cleaned and then copied the 82 file to 83 and then edited it to replace all 82-s with 83 or added it where there seemed to be a list of versions. It got a lot further, but now dies not finding another file. ../rpc/types.h:77:27: error: rpc/netconfig.h: No such file or directory I will send along another message with the build script attached. > Hi Jerry, > > On Mon, 14 May 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I installed AMD64 FreeBSD 8.3 on a new machine a couple of days ago. > >It seems fine so far. > > > >This afternoon I tried to install OpenAFS 1.6.0 on it from > > /usr/ports/net/openafs > > > >The configure ran happily and I didn't notice any errors. > >But, the make died soon after starting with the following complaints. > > > > make: don't know how to make ./param.amd64_fbsd_83.h. stop > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/openafs/work/openafs-1.6.0. > > ** Error code 1 > > > >I presume that means that it does not know about FreeBSD 8.3 yet. > > That's right; the OpenAFS build system has lots of history behind it, > which means that it is not particularly elegant at handling this sort of > thing. A lot of history. We have used it at MSU for a long time. It was never my project to build or maintain, but I used it a lot. > > >I rummaged around in the README it left in the ../work directory > >and saw a bunch of AMD64 versions up to 8.1 (and even 9.0) but > >not 8.2 or 8.3. I noticed in the Makefile where it says: > > IGNORE= Supports FreeBSD 8.0 and later > >I am not sure how that plays in it. I am definitely not a make hacker. > > > >Anyway, is there a good tinker to get past this > >or do I have to wait until something gets updated in the port? > > > >Or, did I just do something stupid? > > No fault on your end; I need to push in updates for 8.3 and 10.0 support > but have been busy with schoolwork. I can sure relate to that. > For now, if you're up for a little bit of tinkering, you could go in to > /usr/ports/net/openafs and 'make clean && make extract', then: > cd work/openafs-1.6.0/src/config && cp param.amd64_fbsd_82.h > param.amd64_fbsd_83.h > and continue with the usual make install, etc., in > /usr/ports/net/openafs/. > If that still does not compile/run, please send me the build log (or > dmesg -a output if a runtime failure) and I will look at it. > > Thanks for the report, and sorry to have been so slow at catching up to > 8.3/10.0. > > -Ben Kaduk Thanks for your help, ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 22:46:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A969E106566B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606AC8FC08 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:46:29 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=rkgxjMBYhgowM3sfH/RQsg+jECNF8WDRFC1Y2qIyHaM= c=1 sm=0 a=F3fr6IO9xwAA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=xib_7JR7MIoZgo8SYocA:9 a=ZpvPvs1j0HCcsaog62cA:7 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:56325] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id F3/96-21955-44E24BF4; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:46:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:46:28 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:46:29 -0000 > > The idea was to "make buildkernel" once and "make buildworld" once > > and install to two different DESTDIRs. > I'm not sure I understand: The two install* targets ("make installkernel" > and "make installworld") are only able to install to _one_ location, > which is the _default_ location *or* the location pointed to by > DESTDIR. It is not possible to perform _one_ install step which > will cause results in _two_ locations (without any means of > "hidden duplication", e. g. by using a mirroring technique). The idea was to "make buildkernel" once and "make buildworld" once, but "make installkernel" and "make installworld" would each have to be done once for each DESTDIR, meaning twice each. Building takes much more computer resources than installing, so I try to avoid building the same thing twice. > I'm refering to the instructions presented in /usr/src/Makefile: > # For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a > # delta of a few days): > # > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). > # 2. `make buildworld' > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > # [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] > # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). > # 6. `mergemaster -p' > # 7. `make installworld' > # 8. `make delete-old' > # 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). > # 10. `reboot' > # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) I checked /usr/src/UPDATING, and the sequence was ... mergemaster -p make installworld mergemaster -i (one may wish also -U) make delete-old I checked /usr/src/Makefile , and found you quoted correctly, see 'make delete-old' and the second 'mergemaster' are transposed relative to what I saw in /usr/src/UPDATING Sort of confusing; make either way works? Subsequently I would also want to build for i386, but this would be after the amd64 build and installation/update. It would be nice if bsdinstall had an option for update as well as fresh install. For i386, I would follow advice on http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine but would want a full installation capable of running independently of amd64, would need the kernel, would install on 16 GB USB stick which could be mounted on /compat/i386. I would want to use hard-drive PORTSDIR, would need to so adjust /etc/make.conf . I don't really want to think of building big ports on a USB stick, especially on the older computer with 256 MB RAM and USB 1.1 on motherboard. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 22:57:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77FA106566C for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E088FC0A for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1305C3D6C3; Thu, 17 May 2012 00:57:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4GMvLAJ007199; Thu, 17 May 2012 00:57:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 00:57:21 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-Id: <20120517005721.f971407e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:57:24 -0000 On Wed, 16 May 2012 18:46:28 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > The idea was to "make buildkernel" once and "make buildworld" once > > > and install to two different DESTDIRs. > > > I'm not sure I understand: The two install* targets ("make installkernel" > > and "make installworld") are only able to install to _one_ location, > > which is the _default_ location *or* the location pointed to by > > DESTDIR. It is not possible to perform _one_ install step which > > will cause results in _two_ locations (without any means of > > "hidden duplication", e. g. by using a mirroring technique). > > The idea was to "make buildkernel" once and "make buildworld" once, > but "make installkernel" and "make installworld" would each have > to be done once for each DESTDIR, meaning twice each. Building > takes much more computer resources than installing, so I try to > avoid building the same thing twice. Yes, _that_ is the correct approach. In case you need to do more than one additional installation, you should consider creating a tar archive of the fully installed system and then use tar --unlink to the mounted target. If you need to create many bootable systems from scratch, a script performing the disklabel, newfs, mount and tar steps should be easy to write. > > I'm refering to the instructions presented in /usr/src/Makefile: > > > # For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a > > # delta of a few days): > > # > > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). > > # 2. `make buildworld' > > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > > # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > > # [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] > > # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). > > # 6. `mergemaster -p' > > # 7. `make installworld' > > # 8. `make delete-old' > > # 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). > > # 10. `reboot' > > # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) > > I checked /usr/src/UPDATING, and the sequence was > > ... > > mergemaster -p > make installworld > mergemaster -i (one may wish also -U) > make delete-old > > > I checked /usr/src/Makefile , and found you quoted correctly, > see 'make delete-old' and the second 'mergemaster' are transposed > relative to what I saw in /usr/src/UPDATING > > Sort of confusing; make either way works? It should not be much difference if you consider what the "steps in permutation" do: mergemaster modifies files, make delete-old removes stuff that isn't needed anymore. Both steps don't seem to affect each other. a + b = b + a. :-) > Subsequently I would also want to build for i386, but this > would be after the amd64 build and installation/update. In case you're creating different TARGET= architectures, the fun doubles. :-) > It would be nice if bsdinstall had an option for update as > well as fresh install. This step can easily be performed manually using freebsd-update right after installation. If you understand update == overwrite, just don't format the partitions that are already present on the target media. > For i386, I would follow advice on http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine > but would want a full installation capable of running > independently of amd64, would need the kernel, would install > on 16 GB USB stick which could be mounted on /compat/i386. > I would want to use hard-drive PORTSDIR, would need to so > adjust /etc/make.conf . I don't really want to think of > building big ports on a USB stick, especially on the older > computer with 256 MB RAM and USB 1.1 on motherboard. Also note that USB sticks are "not real R/W media", they suffer more from using than hard disks do, and they're slower of course. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 01:10:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B098D1065674 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 01:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ramirocaso05@yahoo.com.ar) Received: from nm37-vm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm37-vm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.238.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63D9B8FC14 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 01:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.146] by nm37.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2012 01:07:47 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.11] by tm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2012 01:07:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2012 01:07:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.ar; s=s1024; t=1337216867; bh=Cqr89R6CAaPMHkPNXHz4fEc5+WcCtcIG1wZgZffirlI=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KRA1BTpfMYA477gJUaeV70YMRuVep6tvG2BSdec8S5SB4YSZ/tb8SvVPv4VpC6fC4w9HM0TQo2MYGU/ywhnKaou9bBpTEup8A0keuDZ0uzTB3SaWr71wG2UWfwPlerCSShvUo1qOMKC6fuUJh0a3uXrNfgaO6P21LurCxon304U= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 373551.44969.bm@smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: m7o1MKkVM1mrVqMP7MsS919TL_0msQogz68fpD3mKSEf.WK cJTSjQCdp.133lzdMPVSNA9G4dGruwW9aQhFOMBItX6eIGXLiGoFJ.oCjGgV VB.vPRUQqWFx0P3vT9THfPf0NdcGg09XjdNUT8mqlOlWv0jq0fa6a4CX4g4q udoMhpMVi0ATorGxL_sL2GLHAyMRt9ces7Qh60HQV8jIPO8mXrcW3q5aGQjy xkXdDwaPg7YnDdAKYmvMypbBrMbz18L13LujvWFl7.dq2qDWs0cowANewyEb N6YYGwpmED9lSlNgTjem0_dFL3u5MR0aSumJWUNyAR4e4pv0u4jlOD5pQ7NX jxcrP_QpBvu.RhXIJZx_B3qqqFz7xkO4QUl3jQiphp3uBEOsnJhk7INJq9aJ sv7g_U33PXCWKrI9MpXOfiU0FMIUdmo0qB1XPMBdrq8H7Hbe8Uz5R1fs75b0 2Eg-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: nvs2XB.swBAGTflg2_BV8MKeFlUrIJyEuA-- Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ramirocaso05@186.22.171.89 with plain) by smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2012 18:07:46 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <4FB44F58.20603@yahoo.com.ar> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:07:36 -0300 From: Ramiro Caso User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FB3ADA9.6060501@yahoo.com.ar> <9407d3f053a5b149c1cbd5d41d9777f1.squirrel@webmail.bsdftw.org> In-Reply-To: <9407d3f053a5b149c1cbd5d41d9777f1.squirrel@webmail.bsdftw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 May 2012 01:12:57 +0000 Subject: Re: (mutt +) msmtp problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 01:10:26 -0000 On 16/05/2012 11:04, James Edwards wrote: >> I use mutt (1.5.21) with msmtp (1.4.28) as MDA. Usually, everything goes >> smoothly, but every once in a while I lose network connectivity when >> sending email (I don't recall whether there is a correlation between >> this problem and my trying to send not-so-big but yet around 1mb files). >> >> Basically, what happens in trying to send an email is: >> >> May 16 10:01:17 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED >> bssid=**:**:**:**:**:** reason=0 >> ....... >> May 16 10:02:27 **** wpa_supplicant[662]: CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - >> Connection to **:**:**:**:**:** completed (reauth) [id=0 id_str=] >> ....... >> >> Then I try again, and the same thing happens. All msmtp's log shows is: >> >> errormsg='cannot write to TLS connection: Pipe Broken' exitcode=EX_IOERR >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Best, >> Ramiro > > Based on above, mutt and msmpt *appear* to be fine, but this seems to be a > problem with the wireless driver, card, or router - you are being > disconnected from the network, which in turn is causing the 'broken pipe'. Indeed, mutt + msmtp appear to be fine... My bad for not being clearer... However, there is a correlation that goes beyond credible coincidence: the disconnection happens when (and, as far as I can recall, only when) I use mutt + msmtp to send sizeable files. In particular, no disconnection occurs when I'm not using mutt + msmtp, or when I use mutt + msmtp but I send emails without sizeable attachments. Also, the disconnection happens within seconds of attempting to send the sizeable emails. I guess it is a problem with the wireless card, but it seems to be somehow closely linked to the event of trying to send sizeable emails using mutt + msmtp (when I use thunderbird to send the files, everything works as expected, no disconnection). > You could feasibly work around it by using a wired connection, or take a > look at what is going on with your wireless. My work around, for now, is to use thunderbird for sending large emails, so there's no hurry. But I'm a bit puzzled about what's happening. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 03:35:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BC3106564A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 03:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nm.knife@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D3F8FC0A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 03:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so1416456wgb.31 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:35:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NM9JSb5NB3JMZdsx7sVKjsCHGd80UutfoAizjK/cw68=; b=y+5Z9tu1MJ8adwzyZ8maBKmKP2FUOu9jDDKhwB/oPz4U3MzKhYd7IkNzLsLGeHLNre BJxZSzPjgQxoymF+9PdS2fYDuO6Zk29TwpQIoM5BvnzezIus2pmQVugh8oAl5c/V/QP1 Ci5pkDoj+iSAbwkaRuWoIbybl0a9vjWyFc1MiNRMtIaZaj6ZGOrVO5qKFTP0kbLfspqS /MQ1BjGAnhMukY/vJfZnXegrV32k2+1/0Rkg3ZPIPPVfRVHO7Zh0zUz8pWuYhDZZ+kqE sZ6lP+aMJop8JvDQYRVyui/TBMPnhpIkUhX+tm+JWZCihXS5mlwSJCrMk/dnP5G00eHq BDDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.101.103 with SMTP id ff7mr14030383wib.6.1337225742312; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.58.68 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:35:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: VPN client for MSCHAP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 03:35:44 -0000 Hello list, I am having a horrible time trying to connect to a PPTP VPN with MSCHAP and MSCHAPv2 and MPPE. I have tried pptpclient and mpd5 and both fail on many counts. I assume there is no gui client at this time, but can I get some sample config file for ANY vpn client on FreeBSD... I need user/pass auth with MPPE and login method MSCHAP MSCHAPv2, connecting to URL not an IP. Cheers. -- bgalakazam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 03:47:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6328E106564A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 03:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06-adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC59C8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 03:47:12 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAOtztE/LevdH/2dsb2JhbABEsDKEYYIVAQEFOEEQCw4KCRMDDwkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGICbwKixOFVwOIYZ1Zgnk Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 17 May 2012 13:17:11 +0930 Message-ID: <4FB473E7.6090307@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:13:35 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov References: <20120516042218.GA57757@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20120516042218.GA57757@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the ASUS P8H67-M LGA1155 H67 motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 03:47:13 -0000 On 16/05/2012 13:52, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > Do you have success stories running FreeBSD on an ASUS P8H67-M > LGA1155 H67 motherboard? This will be mostly a desktop system on > 9.0-RELEASE. > > I am worried especially about the Sandy Bridge video, shall I be able > to use it with xorg at least in VESA modes? > > Do also the sound/NIC/etc drivers work well with this motherboard? I am running 9.0-RELEASE on an ASUS P8H61-M LE/USB3 with a corei5 Having the same audio and LAN chips I can say they work. Had some trouble getting the audio working to start with, vaguely recall it was something with the generic sound detection didn't pick the right driver, once I enabled one specific sound device I haven't had trouble (also that was back in rc3). Only using stereo speakers so can't vouch for any surround features. Add snd_hda_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf Using an Nvidia PCIe card - haven't tried the on-board video. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 05:01:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BED1065672 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132458FC0A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:01:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 26439207 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:01:15 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4H51E1p093736 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:01:14 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4H51EQY093735 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:01:14 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:01:14 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120517050114.GA93590@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20120516042218.GA57757@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4FB473E7.6090307@ShaneWare.Biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FB473E7.6090307@ShaneWare.Biz> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the ASUS P8H67-M LGA1155 H67 motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 05:01:22 -0000 Shane Ambler wrote: > > > > Do you have success stories running FreeBSD on an ASUS P8H67-M > > LGA1155 H67 motherboard? This will be mostly a desktop system on > > 9.0-RELEASE. > > > > I am worried especially about the Sandy Bridge video, shall I be able > > to use it with xorg at least in VESA modes? > > > > Do also the sound/NIC/etc drivers work well with this motherboard? > > I am running 9.0-RELEASE on an ASUS P8H61-M LE/USB3 with a corei5 > > Having the same audio and LAN chips I can say they work. Had some > trouble getting the audio working to start with, vaguely recall it was > something with the generic sound detection didn't pick the right driver, > once I enabled one specific sound device I haven't had trouble (also > that was back in rc3). Only using stereo speakers so can't vouch for any > surround features. Add snd_hda_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf Thanks for the good news. Can you please show 'cat /dev/sndstat' and what the kernel thinks about the NIC (is it the re(4) driver?) > > Using an Nvidia PCIe card - haven't tried the on-board video. I have tried PC-BSD 9.0 on a similar motherboard with a Sandy Bridge video, it seems to work in VESA mode. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 05:12:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DB81065670 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DB38FC17 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so5980373wgb.1 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:12:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=TZrOwvK67j5oMFwojfYjHOGBs3wxN8iZ0Mx+aReuGZQ=; b=ne2wUd+nokdw/QK10JvZBzN2JLelHewsgCOXHOCkiAWgtJDlc2yTHNsmU8UEm2eGkL YkttGFYZL11EGAAEjMmsFdosvhJzBUPgNpB8FYs2rtdNZK1cFFN2e0RCsxNPuWTP+ert uBqYbddo8S2CM3VOJx94sYTOG8ZJmdNhJfuI/BFURbESng8xiobLdjfnTRVlbCrBxqET IzTcBT20F5BZuCRSsivxFXS/lgg5lmavQLUYbXZKLHEtkF4gmcOzts4LgbHFLT2pra75 c2bwKtIWYQGg1/o/Z7dtATvQSqOe9Op/A3v33mlIRdwNRzqSKLJTS8t4nk5cVxg9N44D oGrg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.143.146 with SMTP id l18mr611932wej.56.1337231577356; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.161.152 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:12:57 +0800 Message-ID: From: alphachi To: "list: freebsd" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnc9OplmQBNlU03xhQsrvow8QX1X/cuB9EEf5vqD8W+UIIf0shQEm5pr3MuN6Tb5M+4rBuw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Wine for Diablo 3 on FreeBSD 9.0R amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 05:12:59 -0000 Can anybody play diablo 3 with wine on FreeBSD 9R amd64? Wine 1.5.4,1 64bit can't running Diablo III perhaps because of Agent.exe. see http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=25953. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 05:54:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE0C106566C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nm.knife@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15DD8FC15 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj8 with SMTP id hj8so3980970wib.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:54:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GAh9avytvi2zuTsddmMNFLxfFEwDdR+XUUyzlFkFxuc=; b=oUYrfxVFd+sgRdnDBpqfcbTP5mL3+1Hr4jkSzxOIhMKPK0ayBhfYPULOKgZBaS1avl GtAUd2BRiVSkYf+PvzcTeeA0UqwsbkLz93N4JqNKyauXt9+t8rk6K9794hURBQmHdkvD kJ3YNzZPlOgahjKQZY1AQA/ri2GJl5/E8mWfzjP3rKg0lNzkUNmZT6RgLT5meKpfOpL+ qblIliYeiBlRaa1wUt0++LwilNe7qQM4ewasuKh/3O1kq6SX6AFGNah3QarI7PkDtIGZ EjBUP2oaQ/wScObb5AEfth7/IpLOMK36ASz3vUAH0f7uvhD3pkutJt85cqbUVfaczMzL oVpw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.86.5 with SMTP id l5mr47350095wiz.6.1337234066504; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.58.68 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 22:54:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:54:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= To: alphachi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "list: freebsd" Subject: Re: Wine for Diablo 3 on FreeBSD 9.0R amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 05:54:28 -0000 We have to wait, unfortunately. I am using a Linux partition with Wine meanwhile. As long as it's not mainstream, it will be hard to do. Not to mention port is at 1.4. 2012/5/16 alphachi > Can anybody play diablo 3 with wine on FreeBSD 9R amd64? > > Wine 1.5.4,1 64bit can't running Diablo III perhaps because of Agent.exe. > > see http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=25953. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 06:12:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D17E106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DEB8FC16 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so1480738lbo.13 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 23:12:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VVuQrBExkC/un7vweN+6Iu4GvDz9zTKEdd2jZ3TCZXU=; b=sI9o2Bkp191m6GGNvvRgjXuICN7gufofW9pwZnvKA4OWxE7ZdqI2MWw8rFsQzhRzM8 eeuf3aDeKB/CAoGAK9JyusU6UBabQ8scjKObQzAmV7mWf+fqIR2TMDMoRU+oi0gMeEPS ZTQERTeIwu88tRJpEw4cral+JHUX/Old0SpREqHs28t8R0tBFF1LRjovuvWs0mGjgaxy KAJ3g1ykLNBq+i6vaY52fyAawwRtruruSLGAsBHl2BiRpZCpBjQ9x5sUVakU/tAe8eXJ bgCEJg7OmUVixflZYLgfty95aUJpqr/svMICyBc10HPHHl7CInOJLtxLA1KNkLxChH6k So7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.49.227 with SMTP id x3mr2470708lbn.73.1337235136737; Wed, 16 May 2012 23:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.98.70 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 23:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:12:16 +0900 Message-ID: From: fake fake To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ls-F tcsh built-in command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 06:12:19 -0000 BSD's 'ls' seems to support only ANSI colors, so I want to use 'ls-F' instead. (which supports ISO 6429 colors) 'ls-F' colors directories beautifully. But 'ls-F -l' does not, at all. Is this designed, or am I doing something wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 08:02:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9F61065670 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 08:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp1.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54DD8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 08:02:50 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=rkgxjMBYhgowM3sfH/RQsg+jECNF8WDRFC1Y2qIyHaM= c=1 sm=0 a=F3fr6IO9xwAA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=w1QZjdS6WLwhgXUW5icA:9 a=prGEkoKzoijnO1pKwQkA:7 a=fgf5PR_cwQYA:10 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:39046] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id F5/B1-21955-4A0B4BF4; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:02:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 04:02:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:02:50 -0000 from Polytropon: > In case you need to do more than one additional installation, > you should consider creating a tar archive of the fully installed > system and then use tar --unlink to the mounted target. If you > need to create many bootable systems from scratch, a script > performing the disklabel, newfs, mount and tar steps should > be easy to write. I don't want more than one additional installation, and might do that one only once. But if I wanted to create many bootable systems from scratch, I could create an installation image, ISO or memstick. > > Subsequently I would also want to build for i386, but this > > would be after the amd64 build and installation/update. > In case you're creating different TARGET= architectures, > the fun doubles. :-) I think only one build machine is used to create FreeBSD snapshots? You can 'make universe'? I guess the fun more than doubles when I try to create a NetBSD installation cross-building from FreeBSD, or a Cross-Linux-from-Scratch. Consider that NetBSD has been unstable on my new computer even with a binary installation. > > It would be nice if bsdinstall had an option for update as > > well as fresh install. > This step can easily be performed manually using freebsd-update > right after installation. I think freebsd-update is for a binary upgrade from the freebsd.org servers? Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 06:27:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9C8106566C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from syrack@bigpond.com) Received: from nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7AA8FC0A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwcmgw06p ([61.9.190.166]) by nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20120517062735.YJSS15879.nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw06p> for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:27:35 +0000 Received: from HP31024769640 ([124.180.165.68]) by nschwcmgw06p with BigPond Outbound id AuTZ1j00A1UrzYC01uTaVU; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:27:35 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=GeeVbHrL c=1 sm=1 a=334oiMA/Gc8scCFLgMIsEQ==:17 a=JDadKst33uMA:10 a=5yA9N1ca4wraFSTuCaAA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=llAwKT6v93phBDWVxo8A:9 a=qIUJ4uXH3FLUIClhUKIA:7 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=334oiMA/Gc8scCFLgMIsEQ==:117 Message-ID: <52D7F093B01E482CA87C17CB845044B7@HP31024769640> From: "Peter Barnes" To: Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:27:39 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:09:24 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: KPPP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 06:27:37 -0000 Hi Everyone, I would like to use BSD but I use KPPP to connect to my ISP. Is anyone = working on KPPP to include it with BSD? According to Distrowatch no BSD = O/S's have KPPP Regards Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 11:15:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF4B1065670 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@d2ux.net) Received: from h1907788.stratoserver.net (h1907788.stratoserver.net [85.214.252.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B628FC0C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h1907788.stratoserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5E239ED136 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:49:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h1907788.stratoserver.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (h1907788.stratoserver.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkFq7s460ZEX for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:49:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.107] (p5DDAAB67.dip.t-dialin.net [93.218.171.103]) by h1907788.stratoserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FCC39ED135 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:49:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FB4D7AB.9030200@d2ux.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:49:15 +0200 From: Matthias Petermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111228 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Filesystem dump incremental? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:15:23 -0000 Hello, currently I am experiencing something confusing. Some hours ago I did a level 0 dump with the following command: dump -a -0 -f /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.0.dump / This results in a quite big dump file. After changing a couple of files, I tried to do another dump. This time as level 1. My expectation was that the resulting dump would only contain the files which changed since the level 0 dump. dump -a -1 -f /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / To my surprise this seems to generate another full dump instead of incremental. What did I miss or what mistake do I make? The filesystem is mounted with the following options: ufs, local, journaled soft-updates Regards, Matthias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 11:20:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CF8106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227028FC16 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (c80-217-70-175.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.70.175]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q4HBKkwW054596; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:20:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4FB4DEC1.8020704@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:19:29 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120411 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fake fake References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ls-F tcsh built-in command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:20:54 -0000 2012-05-17 08:12, fake fake skrev: > BSD's 'ls' seems to support only ANSI colors, so I want to use 'ls-F' > instead. (which supports ISO 6429 colors) > 'ls-F' colors directories beautifully. But 'ls-F -l' does not, at all. > Is this designed, or am I doing something wrong? From ls manpage -F Display a slash (`/') immediately after each pathname that is a directory, an asterisk (`*') after each that is executable,an at sign (`@') after each symbolic link, an equals sign (`=') after each socket, a percent sign (`%') after each whiteout, and a vertical bar (`|') after each that is a FIFO. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 11:24:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF47106564A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8EB8FC0A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so1679335lbo.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:24:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Sgt7/WYr2WiN3GzHooVIHaI1uFvl9+/ar/GqiRF0FWI=; b=su9SXDCKLwNJHyUuyiMALcRBLpsG7mWTfNeikbHjg1mHGfy48pn7wfZ11pqMwofckV nJjEXsNEvxCbjeHNhKFpdUsYKNsSoyLbLIUDlAyANACvWorcmDiiovGlOumbT87IdjiU nSTmcTDzrCpunKAEhaBv8bt7BXHdAR8hyubLJFgbfHLfXuweD9mpS7mvWNOoCZVtIvpL j0vMBo61tFsf9NFBvVe3TwGsUsWCEtvz67XRSZftinXfwPgGEWBT6aHRgQM1l3T4J9y+ f4qtQCuVOtkbySeQ1TZfGP6vBweW+0w4d/LyA76KhZgZ05QQ47KyAc3UHwWc/4Rol2X7 EU+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.122.116 with SMTP id lr20mr6560083lab.42.1337253842949; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.98.70 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:24:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB4DEC1.8020704@bananmonarki.se> References: <4FB4DEC1.8020704@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:24:02 +0900 Message-ID: From: fake fake To: Bernt Hansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ls-F tcsh built-in command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:24:04 -0000 Thank you for replying. But I am telling 'ls-F' (tcsh built-in command), not 'ls -F'. On 17 May 2012 20:19, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2012-05-17 08:12, fake fake skrev: > >> BSD's 'ls' seems to support only ANSI colors, so I want to use 'ls-F' >> instead. (which supports ISO 6429 colors) >> 'ls-F' colors directories beautifully. But 'ls-F -l' does not, at all. >> Is this designed, or am I doing something wrong? > > > From ls manpage > > -F > Display a slash (`/') immediately after each pathname that is a > directory, an asterisk (`*') after each that is executable,an at sign (`@') > after each symbolic link, an equals sign (`=') after > each socket, a percent sign (`%') after each whiteout, and a vertical bar > (`|') after each that is a FIFO. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 11:38:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC35106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB588FC08 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedlingblack-earthcouk.local ([195.53.238.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4HBbxe6047686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2012 12:38:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4HBbxe6047686 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4HBbxe6047686; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [195.53.238.218] claimed to be seedlingblack-earthcouk.local Message-ID: <4FB4E30D.1050007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:37:49 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Barnes References: <52D7F093B01E482CA87C17CB845044B7@HP31024769640> In-Reply-To: <52D7F093B01E482CA87C17CB845044B7@HP31024769640> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig04A08D0C1F75F8F8D9BC8355" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_XBL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: KPPP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:38:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig04A08D0C1F75F8F8D9BC8355 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17/05/2012 08:27, Peter Barnes wrote: > I would like to use BSD but I use KPPP to connect to my ISP. Is > anyone working on KPPP to include it with BSD? According to > Distrowatch no BSD O/S's have KPPP KPPP is just a KDE-based GUI wrapper around the OS provided PPP functionality. At a guess, the only reason it isn't available on FreeBSD is that FreeBSD pppd uses different configuration syntax to Linux, and no-one has yet written appropriate support. However, it is perfectly possible to configure PPP on FreeBSD without such aids. As ever, the Handbook is your friend: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ppp-and-slip.ht= ml Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig04A08D0C1F75F8F8D9BC8355 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+04xQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwFowCfZy5WC7LZ/ahcUqmzlxkqQBhD ywoAn3Fn9i7nynXmEj0BaEdIzdE0STAK =TAtR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig04A08D0C1F75F8F8D9BC8355-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 11:43:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2FC1065672 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F628FC17 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedlingblack-earthcouk.local ([195.53.238.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4HBhgP2047817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2012 12:43:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4HBhgP2047817 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4HBhgP2047817; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [195.53.238.218] claimed to be seedlingblack-earthcouk.local Message-ID: <4FB4E46E.2040007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:43:42 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Petermann References: <4FB4D7AB.9030200@d2ux.net> In-Reply-To: <4FB4D7AB.9030200@d2ux.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig722366837C5EDAD940683F77" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_XBL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Filesystem dump incremental? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:43:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig722366837C5EDAD940683F77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17/05/2012 12:49, Matthias Petermann wrote: > currently I am experiencing something confusing. Some hours ago I did a= > level 0 dump with the following command: >=20 > dump -a -0 -f /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.0.dump / >=20 > This results in a quite big dump file. After changing a couple of files= , > I tried to do another dump. This time as level 1. My expectation was > that the resulting dump would only contain the files which changed sinc= e > the level 0 dump. >=20 > dump -a -1 -f /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / >=20 > To my surprise this seems to generate another full dump instead of > incremental. >=20 > What did I miss or what mistake do I make? You need '-u' on tose command lines in order to record the dates of your dumps, including your initial level 0 dump, in /etc/dumpdates. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig722366837C5EDAD940683F77 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+05G4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzobwCeIgSyayjIX6itzCujlfrU/aqs URcAn2JlFhR8hAO7bPCA1ihvJdJhHMko =iRIz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig722366837C5EDAD940683F77-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 11:55:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E371E106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7908FC16 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id Azs51j002516WCc01zs6SV; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:52:06 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=VpKh8pKn c=1 sm=1 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=rLpCYgkgFLgA:10 a=3DT9u2tE-lgA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=BwMATOqURqXqyrdYpoYA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SUzFU-0001Bk-Mo; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:52:04 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:52:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4FB4D7AB.9030200@d2ux.net> In-Reply-To: <4FB4D7AB.9030200@d2ux.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201205171252.04519.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Matthias Petermann Subject: Re: Filesystem dump incremental? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:55:16 -0000 On Thursday 17 May 2012, Matthias Petermann wrote: > dump -a -1 -f /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / Try a new full backup with dump -0aLuf /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / then for the incremental use dump -1aLuf /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / The option you're missing is "u", but "L" is worth using as well when you're backing up a mounted filesystem. You could hack the contents of /etc/dumpdates to avoid having to repeat the level zero dump if you know the date and time when the original one was started. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 12:54:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D91065670 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC778FC19 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA863D4CB; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:54:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4HCsbC5002123; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:54:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:54:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: fake fake Message-Id: <20120517145437.03dd4cdf.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <4FB4DEC1.8020704@bananmonarki.se> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: ls-F tcsh built-in command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:54:45 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2012 20:24:02 +0900, fake fake wrote: > Thank you for replying. > But I am telling 'ls-F' (tcsh built-in command), not 'ls -F'. Please see "man csh": ls-F acts like `ls -CF', unless listflags contains an `x', in which case it acts like `ls -xF'. ls-F passes its arguments to ls(1) if it is given any switches, so `alias ls ls-F' generally does the right thing. So if you use ls-F -l, the C shell will _not_ use ls-F, but call /bin/ls instead. So what you've been observing seems to be the intended behaviour. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 12:59:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225DB10657DD for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970098FC0C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so1767900lbo.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:59:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LVcOnVOge4lfrQSy5QswFupknG5wCyI1+kYWEImU46o=; b=GKyp8JAFosVdlYRhpVJbHDJaPKiUA6CpRbx2IUG/LIAkrdwctLnvRaWP9hp+NaQX8r OP/ou31Vb/nh4o//HlebvJXHQie4vSZquFo8ENTox3wiTIF+u0kn9t3QqySbJ1x8uapT brnQV6ysatSdDbaCJ9xiXwwZU3hIKWH5R4v/l085lxRjDZ/6JT/Af05TRzqe9gxpgdl2 /xZ61gnoFbVVBiugu4zHPlX6En5RGXNx0uyGa4ArtSca1MWhsLKQvMqdoSqPvH1vB3Nh TdBlTz0yRlqTxrdJJl+PSeJupbvpW1oZ5qSG581nRVFSSJP+ziT15JLUvf7v94FmNwkm c9+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.128.137 with SMTP id no9mr6985645lab.2.1337259592352; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.98.70 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:59:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120517145437.03dd4cdf.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4FB4DEC1.8020704@bananmonarki.se> <20120517145437.03dd4cdf.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:59:52 +0900 Message-ID: From: fake fake To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: ls-F tcsh built-in command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:59:54 -0000 Oh, dear. I didn't notice it. So, is there no way to color directory in ISO 6429 codes with using tcsh? On 17 May 2012 21:54, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2012 20:24:02 +0900, fake fake wrote: >> Thank you for replying. >> But I am telling 'ls-F' (tcsh built-in command), not 'ls -F'. > > Please see "man csh": > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ls-F acts like `ls -CF', unless listflags contains > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0an `x', in which case it acts like `ls -xF'. =A0ls-F =A0pa= sses =A0its > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0arguments =A0to =A0ls(1) =A0if it is given any switches, s= o `alias ls > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ls-F' generally does the right thing. > > So if you use ls-F -l, the C shell will _not_ use ls-F, but > call /bin/ls instead. So what you've been observing seems to > be the intended behaviour. > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 13:17:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA82F106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D2F8FC1D for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995973D4BC; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4HDHDs2002232; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:17:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:17:13 +0200 From: Polytropon To: fake fake Message-Id: <20120517151713.2503552d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <4FB4DEC1.8020704@bananmonarki.se> <20120517145437.03dd4cdf.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: ls-F tcsh built-in command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:17:14 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2012 21:59:52 +0900, fake fake wrote: > Oh, dear. I didn't notice it. > So, is there no way to color directory in ISO 6429 codes with using tcsh? Judging from "man csh": File names can also be colorized based on filename extension. This is specified in the LS_COLORS variable using the syntax "*ext=string". For example, using ISO 6429 codes, to color all C-language source files blue you would specify "*.c=34". This would color all files ending in .c in blue (34) color. [...] If your terminal does use ISO 6429 color codes, you can compose [...] Not all commands will work on all systems or display devices. It seems that the terminal emulator in use also plays an important role. Search for "LS_COLORS" in the environment variables section of "man csh". However, I've always been satisfied with using $LSCOLORS as "ExGxdxdxCxDxDxBxBxegeg". :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 13:20:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208DF106566C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10EF8FC15 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so550785eab.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VoUM5uXroQ4a+NNKwKihcgGy0jqwNwiWCbrteqafXnI=; b=z9xStFPcKatpLKJT+u0qs1hZXHCNnkjR2lVDres3/T/2fNOpa2L2oKgztSktd2yX09 zl7mJ10tyH3xxh7VOt+6I7Gwxwjt/SLhonmsO+i20rY//h4CpIbWipRmGUSmOcby+5Vw CTSdi/Eh6WKOGRTQFBGA4jEu/ovF+C1+c9L4IbiFk+An+iqX13vOFZOIRCF0vrsihkc5 paS2cNnzei1YDpJFzZpmut9x23wCCDBbHSJICspYQiOoB5t2QSZTXKFS1J0b7GKgcdol 1VIL2mKaKO98ykqK1COiiDB01b3cyuAvLTKdua9O4m9NRII9mGs+qr7RB2qfL53x6u39 2CBA== Received: by 10.213.26.74 with SMTP id d10mr2279266ebc.89.1337260840491; Thu, 17 May 2012 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n52sm28865266eeh.9.2012.05.17.06.20.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 May 2012 06:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:20:32 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120517142032.6e6ee4ad@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4FB4E30D.1050007@FreeBSD.org> References: <52D7F093B01E482CA87C17CB845044B7@HP31024769640> <4FB4E30D.1050007@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: KPPP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:20:47 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:37:49 +0200 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 17/05/2012 08:27, Peter Barnes wrote: > > I would like to use BSD but I use KPPP to connect to my ISP. Is > > anyone working on KPPP to include it with BSD? According to > > Distrowatch no BSD O/S's have KPPP > > KPPP is just a KDE-based GUI wrapper around the OS provided PPP > functionality. At a guess, the only reason it isn't available on > FreeBSD is that FreeBSD pppd uses different configuration syntax to > Linux, and no-one has yet written appropriate support. It's because FreeBSD finally dropped pppd in 8-current, and KPPP doesn't support user ppp. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 14:11:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DDE106568D for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian@comphaiti.com) Received: from omr9.networksolutionsemail.com (omr9.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645658FC1B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cm-omr7 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr9.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4HEBRgP001740 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:27 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr7 smtp.user=christian@comphaiti.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authenticated-UID: christian@comphaiti.com Received: from [200.113.197.181] ([200.113.197.181:56109] helo=ChristianPC) by cm-omr7 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 76/7B-19342-E0705BF4; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:27 -0400 From: "Christian ROUSSEAU" To: Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:23 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac00M0nL/4RYV7HXSLyq1v4w6Gmnog== Content-Language: en-us X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:21:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Network Cards Compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:11:33 -0000 Greetings, I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes with most PC's? THx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 15:34:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6041065672 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian@comphaiti.com) Received: from omr11.networksolutionsemail.com (omr11.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B788FC15 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cm-omr8 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr11.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4HFXwpK004728 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:33:58 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr8 smtp.user=christian@comphaiti.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authenticated-UID: christian@comphaiti.com Received: from [200.113.197.181] ([200.113.197.181:49181] helo=ChristianPC) by cm-omr8 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 1E/FA-01735-56A15BF4; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:33:58 -0400 From: "Christian ROUSSEAU" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:33:54 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIvqr7SgKAQczSt4Nl9boYxNQurnJYJLyfA Content-Language: en-us Subject: FW: Network Cards Compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:34:05 -0000 Greetings, I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes with most PC's? THx _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 15:36:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4346A1065672 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83A38FC14 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q4HFcRZq023059; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:38:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:38:27 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205171538.q4HFcRZq023059@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: christian@comphaiti.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: Network Cards Compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:36:53 -0000 "Christian ROUSSEAU" writes: > > Greetings, > > I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible > network cards. You have my permission. *grin* See : Fint the O/S version you are interested in and select the 'Hardware Notes' link. Select the category of device you want to check, and peruse the devices namd there. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 15:39:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15401065673 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F2A8FC1B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedlingblack-earthcouk.local ([195.53.238.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4HFd1cb052158 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2012 16:39:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4HFd1cb052158 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4HFd1cb052158; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [195.53.238.218] claimed to be seedlingblack-earthcouk.local Message-ID: <4FB51B8C.8030709@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:38:52 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian ROUSSEAU References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1D82CE491710061A6D05C902" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_XBL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Network Cards Compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:39:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1D82CE491710061A6D05C902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17/05/2012 16:11, Christian ROUSSEAU wrote: > I would like to have a list of the free bsd compa= tible > network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That com= es > with most PC's?=20 Realtek cards generally use the re(4) driver: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dre Note that the list of different network cards in that page is not exhaustive: it's just some variants that are known to work. Most cards using one of the referenced chipsets should work. Note 2: "work" in the context of realtek chipsets means that they will work fine for personal usage levels. Don't expect realtek NICs to be able to drive your webserver continually pumping out several megabits per second. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig1D82CE491710061A6D05C902 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+1G5UACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw7ZgCgg9gmuGsMS4s64l4GqjpAfpPs g5EAoJVtQdHL8VghD8k8z+e5hqC5KOT3 =ryGc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1D82CE491710061A6D05C902-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 16:03:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E8A1065672; Thu, 17 May 2012 16:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@d2ux.net) Received: from h1907788.stratoserver.net (h1907788.stratoserver.net [85.214.252.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD898FC17; Thu, 17 May 2012 16:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h1907788.stratoserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA3339ED13B; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:03:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h1907788.stratoserver.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (h1907788.stratoserver.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w+Ux+VFvICrj; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:03:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.107] (p579D3936.dip.t-dialin.net [87.157.57.54]) by h1907788.stratoserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC76039ED207; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:03:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FB5214E.6010106@d2ux.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:03:26 +0200 From: Matthias Petermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111228 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FB4D7AB.9030200@d2ux.net> <201205171252.04519.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201205171252.04519.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mike Clarke , matthew@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Filesystem dump incremental? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:03:23 -0000 Thanks Mike and Matthew, the -u switch was what I missed. It now works fine. Regards, Matthias On 17.05.2012 13:52, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2012, Matthias Petermann wrote: > >> dump -a -1 -f /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / > Try a new full backup with > > dump -0aLuf /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / > > then for the incremental use > > dump -1aLuf /mnt/da0/backup-compaq.1.dump / > > The option you're missing is "u", but "L" is worth using as well when > you're backing up a mounted filesystem. > > You could hack the contents of /etc/dumpdates to avoid having to repeat > the level zero dump if you know the date and time when the original one > was started. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 18:52:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4A3106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DMARTINE@metrogas.com.ar) Received: from mgmswp01.metrogas.com.ar (mgmswp01.metrogas.com.ar [200.63.22.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406AF8FC16 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mggwia.metrogas.com.ar (unknown [10.20.231.83]) by mgmswp01.metrogas.com.ar with smtp id 1c79_1b10_96b168bd_5ce2_49f2_a1ac_47cf1f895b24; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:52:29 -0300 Received: from OMBU_DO-MTA by mggwia.metrogas.com.ar with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:52:29 -0300 Message-Id: <4FB51EB9020000B2000B13C3@mggwia.metrogas.com.ar> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.2 Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:52:25 -0300 From: "Diego Nahuel Martinez" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Consult X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:52:43 -0000 Hi team, I would like to know if 8.2R of BSD supports IBM Power P5 processors. So far I read below http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.2R/hardware.html#PROC-POWERPC that there is some support but not sure which processor that is. Regards, Diego Martinez Saludos, Diego N. Martinez Unixware & Middleware Metrogas S.A. Tel: (+54) 11 4309-1677 Fax: (+54) 11 4309-1662 ********************************************************************* ¡IMPORTANTE! Para evitar accidentes por inhalación de monóxido de carbono: - Mantenga los ambientes ventilados en forma permanente. - Revise que la llama sea color azul y uniforme. - Instale y haga revisar periódicamente sus artefactos sólo a través de gasistas matriculados. Recuerde que los artefactos a gas pueden emitir Monóxido de Carbono: un gas altamente tóxico e imperceptible. Más consejos en http://www.metrogas.com.ar ********************************************************************* Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y va dirigido sólo al destinatario indicado. Si lo ha recibido por error, por favor avísenos inmediatamente vía e-mail a error-mail@metrogas.com.ar y tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. La utilización o divulgación de su contenido puede importar la comisión de un delito. No copie, reproduzca o divulgue -en forma parcial o total- su contenido. Cualquier opinión contenida, es exclusiva de su autor y no representa la opinión de MetroGAS S.A. - Muchas gracias. This message is private and confidential and it is only intended for the addressee named above. If you have received this message and it is not addressed to you, please advise us immediately at error-mail@metrogas.com.ar and kindly remove it from your system. The use or disclosure of its contents may be regarded as an offense. Do not copy, reproduce or disclose them, either partially or fully. Opinions are the exclusive responsibility of the author and do not represent the opinion of MetroGAS S.A. - Thank you. :: http://www.metrogas.com.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 19:08:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F11D106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:08:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [66.251.72.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282358FC12 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nber6 (nber6.nber.org [66.251.72.76]) by mail2.nber.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4HIf9AO040039; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:41:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:35:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Feenberg X-X-Sender: feenberg@nber6 To: Christian ROUSSEAU In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.39/RELEASE, bases: 20120517 #8044092, check: 20120517 clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network Cards Compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:08:25 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2012, Christian ROUSSEAU wrote: > Greetings, > > I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible > network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes > with most PC's? > Just guessing, you have to restrict yourself to a very limited selection? You would do better to post a list of the cards available to you and ask what will work. I have purchased many very inexpensive (<$10) NICs and never had a compatibility problem with whatever was the latest FreeBSD version available at the time, although very expensive cards, and very new motherboard with embedded NICs have sometimes not worked. Also, if you are running an older version of FreeBSD you may have more difficulties. My cynical view is that the vendors of cheap cards don't bother to make modifications to the reference design, so they remain compatible. The official list of compatible NICs is sometimes difficult to reconcile with what is available in the local Micro-Center or Fry's, and I expect the situation is no better where you live. http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/support.html#ETHERNET The Intel Pro/1000 is our current favorite card, but is $35. It supports PXE booting, which we do a lot. Daniel Feenberg NBER From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 19:37:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC0C106566B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDA48FC08 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4HJAibS040282; Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4HJAh5f040279; Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Christian ROUSSEAU In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 17 May 2012 21:10:44 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network Cards Compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:37:20 -0000 > I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible > network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes > with most PC's? i think making list of incompatible network cards would be far easier. since a very long time i just never checked as everything have a driver in FreeBSD. actually i only once seen card that FreeBSD had no driver. fortunately ndisgen tool solved it. Of course using ndisgen and windows driver in anything else than home toy isn't good, but it was exactly home toyputer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 19:40:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9ED106566C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06-adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9D48FC1E for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:40:42 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQEAAVTtU/LevdH/2dsb2JhbABEsAaES4IVAQEEAThBBQsLDhMTAw8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBFodvBLwMiwSFSwOIWZ0bgnk Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 18 May 2012 05:10:41 +0930 Message-ID: <4FB55364.2050208@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 05:07:08 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov References: <20120516042218.GA57757@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4FB473E7.6090307@ShaneWare.Biz> <20120517050114.GA93590@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20120517050114.GA93590@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the ASUS P8H67-M LGA1155 H67 motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:40:42 -0000 On 17/05/2012 14:31, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Thanks for the good news. Can you please show 'cat /dev/sndstat' and > what the kernel thinks about the NIC (is it the re(4) driver?) cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) Installed devices: pcm0: (play) pcm1: (play) pcm2: (play/rec) default pcm3: (play/rec) pcm4: (play) dmesg hdac0: HDA Codec #0: NVidia (Unknown) pcm0: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0 pcm1: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0 hdac1: HDA Codec #0: Realtek ALC887 pcm2: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac1 pcm3: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac1 pcm4: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac1 re0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xf2104000-0xf2104fff,0xf2100000-0xf2103fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 re0: Using 1 MSI-X message re0: Chip rev. 0x2c800000 re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX-flow-master, auto, auto-flow re0: Ethernet address: 14:da:xx:xx:xx:xx ifconfig re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=389b ether 14:da:xx:xx:xx:xx inet 192.168.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.xx.xx inet6 fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 nd6 options=23 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 20:00:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26455106564A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lpeth@centurytel.net) Received: from mail961c35.nsolutionszone.com (mail961c35.nsolutionszone.com [209.235.152.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF09F8FC22 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:00:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: lpeth.centurytel.net Received: from [192.168.1.44] (98-125-77-232.dyn.centurytel.net [98.125.77.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail961c35.nsolutionszone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q4HHMrBE027612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 17:22:55 GMT Message-ID: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:22:43 -0700 From: lpeth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=uCl0FW2GWCxANr8lfHZVxeORB7+CUsUxYqazBYRDkvQ= c=1 sm=1 a=1F-HOIdIGasA:10 a=3WPTVEtZbjMA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=pdzy03qlNco8H3xa+tRpmQ==:17 a=wANTfMhYxlRv6KShIl8A:9 a=_TvRYIEOCvpqMU-hKewA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=pdzy03qlNco8H3xa+tRpmQ==:117 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020207.4FB533F0.0028, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:19:59 +0000 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:00:45 -0000 FreeBSD Dear Sirs; I have a 8core, 32 GB ram server I built myself. AMD cpu, with Supermicro motherboard. I want to use FreeNAS as a database system, and I'm wondering what it will cost to use FreeBSD with FreeNAS. I see the Version I would like is $40 for a four CD set, but that does not mean I get to use the server version of it. What is the server version going to cost? Sincerely, Mark T. Evans From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 20:29:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1AB1065788 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp009.mac.com (nk11p00mm-asmtp009.mac.com [17.158.161.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5050D8FC1A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:29:45 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp009.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0M460011SOXE3640@nk11p00mm-asmtp009.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:29:39 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7580,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-05-17_05:2012-05-17, 2012-05-17, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1205170232 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:29:37 -0700 Message-id: <95ABE1AA-7867-4DF0-87A2-1A9BA00D40D1@mac.com> References: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> To: lpeth X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:29:45 -0000 Hi-- On May 17, 2012, at 10:22 AM, lpeth wrote: > I have a 8core, 32 GB ram server I built myself. AMD cpu, with Supermicro motherboard. I want to use FreeNAS as a database system, and I'm wondering what it will cost to use FreeBSD with FreeNAS. I see the Version I would like is $40 for a four CD set, but that does not mean I get to use the server version of it. What is the server version going to cost? FreeBSD is intended as a server platform; there isn't a different consumer and server version, although you can tune the platform for specific tasks if you like. FreeBSD CD/DVD images are freely available for download; see: http://www.freebsd.org/where.html ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ FreeNAS is a modified version of FreeBSD, which comes preconfigured for ZFS and filesharing; as far as I can tell, their CD/DVD images are also freely available: http://sourceforge.net/projects/freenas/files/FreeNAS-8.0.4/FreeNAS-8.0.4-RELEASE-p2-x64.iso/download ...but you can pay a publisher for a copy instead of downloading, if you prefer. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 20:30:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B19A106574F for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E223A8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so2811264yen.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2SyqsCit6vHIanQxyIoTR1dhwTBbLdftBnSpIfQ8+uw=; b=d4RdfAHSoB7twBLBc/5hrd1w5Elt5xZhCdnpf7auznC9+Z3LKJJ1rXi0VS8VQAzxoe bANGoiLNrxY4KghXzN7tk6Vfq6kd85gUEnn655Xvb/q/1h3zXQJ4uwBJ6X6uYYxh/lny M1DcpZwVm8KZcq+Vt3OJSb2UK4Lx4I37UBIYwfr9JZjl2C9EigmiEQ8/ml1tzyXCvjxy Ex56kPVSGZOKC26IBxdAppbHSPe0M4KHduPb9CgpzgbPJVycbwU9IZpzzmfYRQEApk4h bwmxr1Fx6LMTxg8PbvvNkS7iMDxqzqTx0BpNhFp34JIELImLT4rlpc7XYyWvURM/iQ8c XC6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.70 with SMTP id l6mr7599460oee.38.1337286608081; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.53.1 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:30:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> References: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:30:07 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: lpeth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:30:14 -0000 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:22 AM, lpeth wrote: > FreeBSD > Dear Sirs; > I have a 8core, 32 GB ram server I built myself. AMD cpu, with Supermicro > motherboard. I want to use FreeNAS as a database system, and I'm wondering > what it will cost to use FreeBSD with FreeNAS. I see the Version I would > like is $40 for a four CD set, but that does not mean I get to use the > server version of it. What is the server version going to cost? > Sincerely, > Mark T. Evans > All of these are without cost if you download and burn them to CD/DVD by yourself : http://www.freenas.org/ ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/8.3/ ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 20:36:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF94A106564A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [66.251.72.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674458FC16 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nber6 (nber6.nber.org [66.251.72.76]) by mail2.nber.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4HKZw7g074446; Thu, 17 May 2012 16:35:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:29:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Feenberg X-X-Sender: feenberg@nber6 To: lpeth In-Reply-To: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> Message-ID: References: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.39/RELEASE, bases: 20120517 #8044092, check: 20120517 clean Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:36:08 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2012, lpeth wrote: > FreeBSD > Dear Sirs; > I have a 8core, 32 GB ram server I built myself. AMD cpu, with Supermicro > motherboard. I want to use FreeNAS as a database system, and I'm wondering > what it will cost to use FreeBSD with FreeNAS. I see the Version I would like > is $40 for a four CD set, but that does not mean I get to use the server > version of it. What is the server version going to cost? > Sincerely, > Mark T. Evans FreeNAS is effectively a FreeBSD distribution emphasizing storage. It is open source and free of cost: http://www.freenas.org/ The CDs are nice, but you can download an ISO also. iXSystems have TrueNAS, which is costly. My understanding is that FreeNAS is a subset of TrueNAS. See: http://www.ixsystems.com/storage/ix/truenas/ for more information. Daniel Feenberg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 21:21:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21211065672 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 21:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC908FC14 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 21:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4HLAgAJ094996 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 16:10:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:10:42 -0500 From: "Dean E. Weimer" To: Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> Message-ID: <91ec22100b4f963dad9988b7779a742a@www.dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.6 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:21:31 -0000 On 05/17/2012 15:29, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2012, lpeth wrote: > >> FreeBSD >> Dear Sirs; >> I have a 8core, 32 GB ram server I built myself. AMD cpu, with >> Supermicro motherboard. I want to use FreeNAS as a database system, >> and I'm wondering what it will cost to use FreeBSD with FreeNAS. I see >> the Version I would like is $40 for a four CD set, but that does not >> mean I get to use the server version of it. What is the server version >> going to cost? >> Sincerely, >> Mark T. Evans > > > FreeNAS is effectively a FreeBSD distribution emphasizing storage. It > is open source and free of cost: > > http://www.freenas.org/ > > The CDs are nice, but you can download an ISO also. iXSystems have > TrueNAS, which is costly. My understanding is that FreeNAS is a > subset > of TrueNAS. See: > > http://www.ixsystems.com/storage/ix/truenas/ > > for more information. > > Daniel Feenberg > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" They also sell a FreeNAS for home / Small office installs that is vary reasonably priced, I have been hoping to have enough spare cash on hand this winter to buy one as an upgrade my existing FreeNAS box that was built form spare PC parts with a few new hard drives thrown in ever since I have noticed the new product on their website. http://www.ixsystems.com/storage/ix/home-office-storage/freenas-mini.html -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 00:17:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9411B106564A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F6F8FC08 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q4I0JCTv027937; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:19:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:19:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205180019.q4I0JCTv027937@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, lpeth@centurytel.net In-Reply-To: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:17:46 -0000 lpeth wrote: > > FreeBSD > Dear Sirs; > I have a 8core, 32 GB ram server I built myself. AMD cpu, with > Supermicro motherboard. I want to use FreeNAS as a database system, and > I'm wondering what it will cost to use FreeBSD with FreeNAS. I see the > Version I would like is $40 for a four CD set, but that does not mean I > get to use the server version of it. What is the server version going > to cost? The current pricing for an unlimited server liense for FreeBSD is 27342.71 Quatloos. Payment may also be tendered in gold-presed latinum, albeit that is subject to highly volatile exchange-rate fluctuations. Having completed the licensing requirements, you can download a complete installation, including source, from any of the mirror repositories, at no additional cost. Or you can pay a third party a nominal fee (set by mutual agreement between you and them) to have them make copies on the physical media of your choice. Be advised the initial paragraph of this reply was first released precisely 47 days ago. The 'true answer' begins with 'you can...' in the 2nd para. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 00:36:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AF4106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vance.siemens@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14528FC0A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so3549087pbb.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 17:36:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IET6N3fX0R4J9IF0dTXIiz0a3MxGp03cJkrdRAF5HLk=; b=rLixbEvhYX96+W9HJhL7SxIX9X01i1VeUCg0QxPY4+2423+ygq1OckqYT4xM/sLP2f 2arXli+aiotnJ7rLvQbqaNLJi7j8JXOyFPma4HSyBIcMT+50bx6bp2o0XpgyimuRyJrU SQ9GrUrGtTl3I02XVjAaTgczbRy9rqqm86rcvy1VuAqud9GdJ/ebXKJSWyudTO9T7rhc rNhwrSFVFkpIzITpktdFAAcPP4vXDCClC3W1EG9DTRgBHQgmv0HFYQ5fJYCC8ZQdsJuj gjDlzmnEU+9lSR4UqjZIkeaE1hnhoxfGeUG8IrDz1hvoAWhxxKKm9YmPNDbRzCumBjDC lqTQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.195.65 with SMTP id ic1mr28883380pbc.71.1337301398390; Thu, 17 May 2012 17:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.25.138 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 17:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:36:38 -0400 Message-ID: From: Vance Siemens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , "Eric S. Raymond" Subject: FreeBSD X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:36:39 -0000 http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 00:46:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1CE106564A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616F28FC0A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3VtrKn31LhzWk for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:46:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:45:40 -0400 From: Daniel Staal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <75F894366BD7B4E3C7523626@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: FreeBSD X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:46:28 -0000 --As of May 17, 2012 8:36:38 PM -0400, Vance Siemens is alleged to have said: > http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.ht Um, wasn't April 1st *last* month? Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 02:07:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB90106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 02:07:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EFC8FC14 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 02:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so2026956wib.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:07:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+LdrAweQAG7aGIEX+E5A2aOoHpytAzOEEa1oS0M7nRo=; b=dtqYdcHXNgbtDHC3AQ1sX4KWKg3IXCP6x/kQ4OsEX9f7NqKLOdhDW0HpY0slm/IYyy qEOzQuR/8H2Z7Nd3lU9hQTV9u6VM74aOVqb7QOGgdWzMtEANQ535qmQ2BQFkG/4AQgg0 qaFSoTlbj8ekQvO31i27FoN1qk+B09jhOFgkHFvXIS+Lo0i1vbAATBOBP6FYYvna/l1K /OXck6rGHpmol0n3lNpe2rtxX7zAAuD14NV8oVYV8OyNrkaddeBs0obsC9IKtWiq2KgI RFnIYMXHt9Yb8sKo0PBFu73r/g3ChpgQxH4CGJOtnTkh94BmUlI9wDdev91L9VkQsDIo pwlg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.101.103 with SMTP id ff7mr23651681wib.6.1337306876928; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.88.155 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:07:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <75F894366BD7B4E3C7523626@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> References: <75F894366BD7B4E3C7523626@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:07:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Daniel Staal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 02:07:58 -0000 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Staal wrote: > --As of May 17, 2012 8:36:38 PM -0400, Vance Siemens is alleged to have > said: > > http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/**05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-** >> apple-quality.ht >> > > Um, wasn't April 1st *last* month? > Perhaps it's the author, it's at least some type of "hey look at me!" type of behavior. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-May/033580.html -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 03:21:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95805106564A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 03:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668D88FC0A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 03:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so3698802pbb.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:21:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=efp7Y7auVxrpZwp+3SNAJ4+8XL5Zj/tp56a7mjAqnYs=; b=Gg+WrTmSnk/GHK6Vq4q2E2DxupWCWz4Y3w00cHR4e1sCBri3PTa1Jt/gF2eLbH4kwu DVRlBwzElvx05QDuMxZ2byvFB93/RtQsbTH2jVzAQp0P0MWdKKJOJRwTEEPYCF7DvhUB l+kSkY7sI59u7HehNGfEaLS6bvEo+VpHfKxba7lJCPXByR384QDrI399B7ZYulQELK9p Z28L83LWCWlBi0BhTus/x9NeL7oZKjCRQpv04U40oCgQVJ0x0F81RhRTQIxX4ERCGDr2 3Krsq+IDb4AC6OQsRfuJB6m4DAZHcNM4BGBjZXFd7Kr6y+xiu9RU+sUYk5y7Habxyrht sZGA== Received: by 10.68.191.196 with SMTP id ha4mr26128793pbc.146.1337311313959; Thu, 17 May 2012 20:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pw10sm11208388pbb.61.2012.05.17.20.21.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 May 2012 20:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB5C1A8.4050504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:27:36 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 03:21:54 -0000 On 05/17/2012 05:36 PM, Vance Siemens wrote: > http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.html > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > . > Screw this, I'm going over to Ubuntu. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 05:05:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285AB106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 05:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.barnabas@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE0A8FC08 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 05:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so3663816dad.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 22:05:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rKhMkFvCnoPcG9PsB1XlUXBNN84uFec8jO/vVrSf+5M=; b=cp6sKC+fFZH5lY4pxBlIaz+AlgzmZx5SnMqm9UksBh1dIugq2UXiZcPua1WkQvakhr IlUM0JGn3t9F2h98hVwacvCViWKkMJZcBn8z7CDU65nfRHlQeMoQjxVj7MDjPlvtIWN8 Xvj7VZkTWQ8EWkf4PQWIZtLBAb8KSSdiB3ynu+hqPIBZ9vco1rR583OdR8exw0kwGh4K L1JtuNrycBFXDVAIy7RugLndcqRr8/sSgSw98DFOne7MiC/OIfE5du1A0eK0ULnx6GWp PFG6DwNvXSqSVmqk4DaL/Rc2b8eHhn4Nyr5MaTNH9KA/bYSyPzxkqn4iR6VvyYwRe3eJ 2xBQ== Received: by 10.68.222.197 with SMTP id qo5mr31312844pbc.72.1337317521433; Thu, 17 May 2012 22:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip68-98-76-182.ph.ph.cox.net. [68.98.76.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ny10sm11507010pbb.38.2012.05.17.22.05.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 May 2012 22:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:05:22 -0700 From: Colin Barnabas To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20120518050522.GB11824@hs1.VERBENA> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: FreeBSD X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 05:05:22 -0000 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Vance Siemens wrote: > http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.html > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" What a steaming pile of poo. How can anyone take this seriously? -- Colin Barnabas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 05:54:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6885E106566C for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 05:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D328FC17 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 05:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so2534006lbo.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 22:54:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vbKGQA10hDTWV9jC+Qk8ARaTJgLOTxl5lYR6bq8P0fY=; b=oE59oYppxbeeqVR5COqDbayLxF85Kq07nccDxAXGwKVbZ0pHaTdHYU4UwyjwBL95O1 /M+BhwnkequhkdlVTGXCNenhdLoqHngoGRGuMGUS6Dde+FXKNuXNpQDj4dJfv8Bd2MQh Yegr6jTcs2LK4af8OfJFFcuVbzIV2KWOCqPtjfmSGd6VDxhRrOxuCP9eyx+OYuiKbsRw dXglPzWKiMfOhaXI5omcYUJ0d/k6AxBBlu/N/J1GXguCtaHA7ToMbVQd1No1Iulon9bt Nmdhff3pwgWBJrc+T1D/j2O6YSJ3P3+5XgAvOuXFX6h6r94Cy7hgDXn4A+wRepp5FoMb AxSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.82.165 with SMTP id j5mr4311341lby.50.1337320453564; Thu, 17 May 2012 22:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.24.131 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 22:54:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120518050522.GB11824@hs1.VERBENA> References: <20120518050522.GB11824@hs1.VERBENA> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 07:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Colin Barnabas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 05:54:15 -0000 On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Colin Barnabas wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Vance Siemens wrote: >> http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.html >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > What a steaming pile of poo. How can anyone take this seriously? > No one should. Taking into account the name "Trollaxor", the comments, etc, it is obviously a blog made to provoke (in the "good" sense of the word). Have a look at this other post: http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/why-i-quit-openbsd.html :) > -- > Colin Barnabas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 12:07:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBDE106566C for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1337774837.907aca@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DDB8FC16 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IC7Itx034770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 08:07:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1337774837.907aca@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q4IC7Hrd034769 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 08:07:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1337774837.907aca@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1337774837.907aca@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 18 May 2012 08:07:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 08:07:16 -0400 To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20120518120716.GA28838@skytracker.ca> References: <20120516200837.GA63280@skytracker.ca> <70BC5C41-FD4F-4B57-86F8-8C48BA075EC1@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70BC5C41-FD4F-4B57-86F8-8C48BA075EC1@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: David Banning Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with networking and route command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:07:25 -0000 > > It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that > > can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole > > lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands > > without success. > > You need to implement NAT on this box, since 192.168.0.0/16 is an RFC-1918 unrouteable private network range. I previously connected to the internet using ppp with the -nat option and now my connection has changed - so that makes sense. So I implemented natd. Unfortunately natd does not work as yet. I followed the setup as laid out in "man natd" and also used the layout in; http://www.freebsddiary.org/ipfw.php Here is my natd setup 1. Compiled IPFIREWALL & IPDIVERT into my kernel - went fine. Here is my rc.conf network related entries; natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="rl0" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" gateway_enable="YES" ifconfig_rl0="inet 64.40.244.36 netmask 255.255.255.240" defaultrouter="64.40.244.33" ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" ifconfig_vr0=up ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.1.1" network_interfaces="rl0 vr0 lo0" ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/firewall.rules" firewall_type="simple" firewall_logging="YES" dhcpd_ifaces="vr0" dhcpd_enable="YES" My firewall rules; ipfw add 64000 allow ip from any to any ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via rl0 ipfw add allow tcp from any to 192.168.2.1 139 ipfw add allow tcp from any to 192.168.1.1 139 ipfw add 6000 deny tcp from any to 64.40.244.36 139 ipfw add 6010 deny tcp from any to 64.40.244.36 445 ipfw add deny tcp from any to any 139 My /etc/natd.conf; interface rl0 use_sockets yes same_ports yes My /etc/services includes the line; natd 8668/divert # Network Address Translation socket Output of ifconfig; # ifconfig fwe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 02:11:d8:b3:0e:43 ch 1 dma -1 vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::16d6:4dff:fe47:88ae%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 14:d6:4d:47:88:ae media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 64.40.244.36 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 64.40.244.47 inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe66:7162%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 ether 00:11:95:66:71:62 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 >From my initial communication I have swapped the uses of the two network cards - which explains the reversal of entries for devices vr0 and rl0. Still I have server connection to the internet on rl0 and server connection to the network on vr0 - but the network cannot connect to the internet via rl0. If there are any commands that would help collect information leading to the answer I would appreciate any feedback. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 12:08:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5799C106568D for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwb@hera.homer.att.com) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAE18FC18 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com (unknown [135.205.193.8]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBBA120429 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hera.homer.att.com (hera.homer.att.com [135.205.193.102]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IBndcb014384 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:49:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hera.homer.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.homer.att.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4IBndvU028665 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:49:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <201205181149.q4IBndvU028665@hera.homer.att.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28663.1337341779.1@hera.homer.att.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 07:49:39 -0400 From: "J. W. Ballantine" Subject: Mouse stopped working in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:08:14 -0000 Hi, Before the update of x11 on 4/21/2012, X was working fine, but now when I startx, my usb and touchpad mouse are no longer found. The mouse works in terminal mode, and hald and dbus are started in /etc/rc.conf. I rebuilt x11, but that had no effect, any ideas on what I might do to get the mouse working again? Here is the tail of the Xorg log. (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" (**) Option "XkbRules" "base" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "AT Keyboard" (type: KEYBOARD) (II) config/hal: Adding input device PS/2 Mouse (II) LoadModule: "mouse" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so (II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 1.7.1 Module class: X.Org XInput Driver ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 7.0 (WW) PS/2 Mouse: No Device specified, looking for one... (II) PS/2 Mouse: Setting Device option to "/dev/psm0" (--) PS/2 Mouse: Device: "/dev/psm0" (==) PS/2 Mouse: Protocol: "Auto" (**) PS/2 Mouse: always reports core events (**) Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/psm0 Device busy. (EE) PS/2 Mouse: cannot open input device (II) UnloadModule: "mouse" (EE) PreInit returned NULL for "PS/2 Mouse" (EE) config/hal: NewInputDeviceRequest failed (8) (II) UnloadModule: "kbd" Thanks Jim Ballantine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 12:45:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF2D106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwb@hera.homer.att.com) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A458FC0C for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com (unknown [135.205.193.8]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAE01202EC; Fri, 18 May 2012 08:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [135.207.103.207] ([135.207.103.207]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4ICjqd7015924; Fri, 18 May 2012 08:45:52 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: James Ballantine In-Reply-To: <4FB64022.6010206@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 08:45:52 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <874F0B67-8926-4095-BC49-E3C4D87F5543@hera.homer.att.com> References: <201205181149.q4IBndvU028665@hera.homer.att.com> <4FB64022.6010206@bananmonarki.se> To: Bernt Hansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse stopped working in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:45:54 -0000 I'm running Gnome2 on a 9-stable system. On May 18, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2012-05-18 13:49, J. W. Ballantine skrev: >> Hi, >> >> Before the update of x11 on 4/21/2012, X was working fine, but now >> when I startx, my usb and touchpad mouse are no longer found. The >> mouse works in terminal mode, and hald and dbus are started in >> /etc/rc.conf. > > I have exactly the same problem. What windowmanager are you > using? I'm using xfce4, I have a workaround for that. > > 1. start X > 2. when it comes up press alt+F2, the start program dialog comes up > 3. type in xterm or your terminal of choice > 4. in your terminal su to root then type > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus restart && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald restart > > wait a few seconds and the mouse should work again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 13:00:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844FD1065677 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwb@hera.homer.att.com) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5785B8FC18 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com (unknown [135.205.193.8]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACA3120414; Fri, 18 May 2012 09:00:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [135.207.103.207] ([135.207.103.207]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4ID0ej9016372; Fri, 18 May 2012 09:00:41 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: James Ballantine In-Reply-To: <4FB646E4.8040905@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 09:00:40 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201205181149.q4IBndvU028665@hera.homer.att.com> <4FB64022.6010206@bananmonarki.se> <874F0B67-8926-4095-BC49-E3C4D87F5543@hera.homer.att.com> <4FB646E4.8040905@bananmonarki.se> To: Bernt Hansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse stopped working in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:00:52 -0000 I'll try after the current build finishes, and I'll let you know what = happens. Thanks On May 18, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2012-05-18 14:45, James Ballantine skrev: >> I'm running Gnome2 on a 9-stable system. >=20 > Can you get a terminal running in gnome, without a mouse, then > I guess my workaround should work for you to. >=20 >> On May 18, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: >=20 >>> I have exactly the same problem. What windowmanager are you >>> using? I'm using xfce4, I have a workaround for that. >>>=20 >>> 1. start X >>> 2. when it comes up press alt+F2, the start program dialog comes up >>> 3. type in xterm or your terminal of choice >>> 4. in your terminal su to root then type >>>=20 >>> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus restart&& /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald restart >>>=20 >>> wait a few seconds and the mouse should work again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 13:07:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096C7106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B0C8FC12 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8145B299D2; Fri, 18 May 2012 09:00:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FB647EC.301@cyberleo.net> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 08:00:28 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120513 Thunderbird/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:07:24 -0000 On 05/17/2012 07:36 PM, Vance Siemens wrote: > http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.html My favourite part was when the article sourced other articles on the same blog as 'developers'. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 13:14:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3115C106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E203B8FC1A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4IDELYa065869; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:14:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4IDELqw065866; Fri, 18 May 2012 07:14:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 07:14:21 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "J. W. Ballantine" In-Reply-To: <201205181149.q4IBndvU028665@hera.homer.att.com> Message-ID: References: <201205181149.q4IBndvU028665@hera.homer.att.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 18 May 2012 07:14:22 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse stopped working in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:14:23 -0000 On Fri, 18 May 2012, J. W. Ballantine wrote: > Before the update of x11 on 4/21/2012, X was working fine, but now > when I startx, my usb and touchpad mouse are no longer found. The > mouse works in terminal mode, and hald and dbus are started in > /etc/rc.conf. > > I rebuilt x11, but that had no effect, any ideas on what I might > do to get the mouse working again? > (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/psm0 > Device busy. > (EE) PS/2 Mouse: cannot open input device > (II) UnloadModule: "mouse" > (EE) PreInit returned NULL for "PS/2 Mouse" > (EE) config/hal: NewInputDeviceRequest failed (8) > (II) UnloadModule: "kbd" For a test, comment out the mouse InputDevice section and the entry in the ServerLayout section. X doesn't need them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 18:45:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A06F106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwb@hera.homer.att.com) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5C58FC08 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com (unknown [135.205.193.8]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848DF120442 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:45:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [135.207.103.207] ([135.207.103.207]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IIj62k028836; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:45:07 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: James Ballantine In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:45:06 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <072921B4-8F58-413E-9633-F40B1F16E7C9@hera.homer.att.com> References: <201205181149.q4IBndvU028665@hera.homer.att.com> To: Warren Block X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse stopped working in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:45:08 -0000 Warren, I did as you suggested and I still have the same problem Jim On May 18, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2012, J. W. Ballantine wrote: >=20 >> Before the update of x11 on 4/21/2012, X was working fine, but now >> when I startx, my usb and touchpad mouse are no longer found. The >> mouse works in terminal mode, and hald and dbus are started in >> /etc/rc.conf. >>=20 >> I rebuilt x11, but that had no effect, any ideas on what I might >> do to get the mouse working again? >=20 >> (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/psm0 >> Device busy. >> (EE) PS/2 Mouse: cannot open input device >> (II) UnloadModule: "mouse" >> (EE) PreInit returned NULL for "PS/2 Mouse" >> (EE) config/hal: NewInputDeviceRequest failed (8) >> (II) UnloadModule: "kbd" >=20 > For a test, comment out the mouse InputDevice section and the entry in = the ServerLayout section. X doesn't need them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 18:54:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA2B1065670 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwb@hera.homer.att.com) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043538FC08 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com (unknown [135.205.193.8]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8446A120447; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:54:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [135.207.103.207] ([135.207.103.207]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IIsu84029052; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:54:57 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: James Ballantine In-Reply-To: <4FB64022.6010206@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:54:56 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201205181149.q4IBndvU028665@hera.homer.att.com> <4FB64022.6010206@bananmonarki.se> To: Bernt Hansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse stopped working in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:54:59 -0000 Bernt, I tried what you suggested, and after discovering that dbus was not = installed correctly and rebuilding and reinstalling, your suggestion worked. So at least = there is a work around until the real cause is found and fixed. Thanks Jim On May 18, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2012-05-18 13:49, J. W. Ballantine skrev: >> Hi, >>=20 >> Before the update of x11 on 4/21/2012, X was working fine, but now >> when I startx, my usb and touchpad mouse are no longer found. The >> mouse works in terminal mode, and hald and dbus are started in >> /etc/rc.conf. >=20 > I have exactly the same problem. What windowmanager are you > using? I'm using xfce4, I have a workaround for that. >=20 > 1. start X > 2. when it comes up press alt+F2, the start program dialog comes up > 3. type in xterm or your terminal of choice > 4. in your terminal su to root then type >=20 > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus restart && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald restart >=20 > wait a few seconds and the mouse should work again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 19:03:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84CA1065672 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EA58FC1E for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q4IJ3OGw000552; Sat, 19 May 2012 05:03:24 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 05:03:23 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Jos Chrispijn In-Reply-To: <20120517115528.7C3FB1065744@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20120519040542.A98171@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20120517115528.7C3FB1065744@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newsyslog | Cronjob faulty? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:03:41 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 415, Issue 4, Message: 12 On Wed, 16 May 2012 21:44:53 +0200 Jos Chrispijn wrote: > At midnight (00.00) I run this cronjob from my crontab: > > Crontab: > 00 * * * * root newsyslog By 'my' crontab, do you mean the system crontab, /etc/crontab ? If so, that's nearly but not quite the default syntax of: #minute hour mday month wday who command # Rotate log files every hour, if necessary. 0 * * * * root newsyslog Note the single '0'. I don't know if '00' is valid. And it doesn't mean 'at midnight', it means whenever the minute is 0, any hour, any day, any month, any weekday; ie newsyslog is run hourly, on the hour. And the default entry in /etc/newsyslog.conf for maillog is: /var/log/maillog 640 7 * @T00 JC So it's newsyslog using newsyslog.conf(5) that creates maillog if it doesn't yet exist, rotates it to maillog.0 at midnight (T00), thereafter compressing it with bzip2 (J). > For some reason this goes wrong; (if I run 'newsyslog' on any other > time, there is no error message). > > bzip2: Can't open input file /var/log/maillog.0: No such file or directory. > newsyslog: `bzip2 -f /var/log/maillog.0' terminated with a non-zero > status (1) > > /var/log: > -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 63162 May 16 21:20 maillog > -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 109 May 16 00:00 maillog.0.bz2 > -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 73674 May 16 00:00 maillog.1 > -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 111 May 15 00:00 maillog.2.bz2 > -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 73050 May 15 00:00 maillog.3 > -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 109 May 14 00:00 maillog.4.bz2 > -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 184042 May 14 00:00 maillog.5 > > Can somebody tell me what goes wrong here? Looks likely two instances of newsyslog racing at midnight; one makes maillog.0.bz2 from the just-rolled maillog.0, the other finds maillog.0 has disappeared before getting to run bzip2 on it? So, two files per day, and the above message? > On my other FreeBSD server the same cronjob goes ok... Check /etc/crontab and /etc/newsyslog.conf on both, and make sure you're not also trying to run a user crontab for root, apart from /etc/crontab? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 20:10:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08EE1065672 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 20:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tesla@sunset.tx.net) Received: from sunset.tx.net (sunset.tx.net [141.198.193.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702648FC16 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 20:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sunset.tx.net (sunset.tx.net [141.198.193.110]) by sunset.tx.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IJwQ1F064511 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:58:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tesla@sunset.tx.net) Received: from localhost (tesla@localhost) by sunset.tx.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id q4IJwQtO064508 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:58:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tesla@sunset.tx.net) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:58:26 -0500 (CDT) From: tess lamont To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD 9.0-R installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:10:31 -0000 I created a RAID 1 drive in a Dell Optiplex 755, using the internal RAID controller and two 160GB drives, naming the logical drive "freebsd90". Within the system setup menu, the boot menu shows that "freebsd90" is the first (and only) bootable hard drive. Yet when I try to install FreeBSD 9.0-R, FreeBSD ignores the hardware RAID and sees the two separate drives, instead of seeing a single logical drive. Is there a way to get FreeBSD 9.0 to recognize the Optiplex 755 RAID 1 drive? If not, can I just install FreeBSD to one of the drives and expect the hardware RAID to mirror it properly? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 20:50:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CC5106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 20:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF71D8FC14 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 20:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3757429vbm.13 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:50:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zedXKiPwJ+P0iPH3JXH485haatJ35UDLh2gnRY4BvVU=; b=oZBOk/bphSZ+T//rYHyheEwF5WtzjPxi3Jj96gMVcpmdUCh+zK+/vf6ygXf/9roic+ KcmAKFcJd5j2TeSM7e2EhOO8wYShSynbIkC41T/Dz8BFhmF/bXXZ3Zs/OcEmVPKJ77eX 01sDUb1GQZdzs6gKt5rf5LW2rOrE73X+aezvJUFzDRQOB0YIbUIgigzpkDZrKnXcUKLB Y/IHAfO/Cq0U7mFmAkt4FliMSTGlj0+U7j5SavXgYMzloTmEcVb7V3ctuQcN+L6vN4/Z 9DqgkaQn/UTW0HNbN3MUsQH8dS8a1Updp0CJrcRw0Cf3FjK9xPR/ZZ9aOzJzHDKS1XN1 qNLA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.38 with SMTP id a6mr5976966vdf.37.1337374257935; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.112.167 with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201205180019.q4I0JCTv027937@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <4FB533E3.9010805@centurytel.net> <201205180019.q4I0JCTv027937@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:50:57 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:50:59 -0000 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Robert Bonomi w= rote: > > lpeth wrote: >> >> FreeBSD >> Dear Sirs; >> I have a 8core, 32 GB ram server I built myself. AMD cpu, with >> Supermicro motherboard. I want to use FreeNAS as a database system, and >> I'm wondering what it will cost to use FreeBSD with FreeNAS. I see the >> Version I would like is $40 for a four CD set, but that does not mean I >> get to use the server version of it. What is the server version going >> to cost? > > The current pricing for an unlimited server liense for FreeBSD is 27342.7= 1 > Quatloos. =A0Payment may also be tendered in gold-presed latinum, albeit = that > is subject to highly volatile exchange-rate fluctuations. > > Having completed the licensing requirements, you can download a complete > installation, including source, from any of the mirror repositories, at > no additional cost. Or you can pay a third party a nominal fee (set by > mutual agreement between you and them) to have them make copies on the > physical media of your choice. > > > Be advised the initial paragraph of this reply was first released precise= ly > 47 days ago. =A0The 'true answer' begins with 'you can...' in the 2nd par= a. I bought my license with 4,000 unobtainium coins. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 23:57:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D61106566B for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1622D8FC12 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q4INx9YI050576; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:59:09 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:59:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205182359.q4INx9YI050576@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tesla@sunset.tx.net In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD 9.0-R installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:57:31 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 18 15:12:56 2012 > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:58:26 -0500 (CDT) > From: tess lamont > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD > 9.0-R installation > > I created a RAID 1 drive in a Dell Optiplex 755, using the internal RAID > controller and two 160GB drives, naming the logical drive "freebsd90". > Within the system setup menu, the boot menu shows that "freebsd90" is the > first (and only) bootable hard drive. > > Yet when I try to install FreeBSD 9.0-R, FreeBSD ignores the hardware RAID > and sees the two separate drives, instead of seeing a single logical > drive. FreeBSD will use a hardware RAID device -only- if the particular type of RAID chip/chipset/controller is known to the included device drivers. >From some casual searching on the 'net, I can't find anything that indicates -what- RAID controller is in the Optiplex 755. IF you know, or can find that info, check: to see if that disk controller is listed. If yes, it should 'just work'. If it is not listed, you're out of luck. If you can't in the controller informtion, you'll need to post something that includes the boot-up messages showing what FreeBSD found for disks and disk controllers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 03:11:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ECC106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 03:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C5E8FC17 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 03:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4J3BZSx027815; Fri, 18 May 2012 21:11:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4J3BZIY027812; Fri, 18 May 2012 21:11:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:11:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: tess lamont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 18 May 2012 21:11:35 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD 9.0-R installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 03:11:36 -0000 On Fri, 18 May 2012, tess lamont wrote: > I created a RAID 1 drive in a Dell Optiplex 755, using the internal RAID > controller and two 160GB drives, naming the logical drive "freebsd90". Within > the system setup menu, the boot menu shows that "freebsd90" is the first (and > only) bootable hard drive. > > Yet when I try to install FreeBSD 9.0-R, FreeBSD ignores the hardware RAID > and sees the two separate drives, instead of seeing a single logical drive. See graid(8). If it supports that controller, FreeBSD should be able to boot from the array and use it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 04:15:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992D4106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 04:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abnewwest@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8228FC12 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 04:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so5040388dad.13 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 21:15:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4jPEhBWv3WM5vcd+yGAINz53NWzsHW7ideE9VCtz5gA=; b=WALLyR8Dr3jL1ZzztVqQA8XemKSucJG8yhevQqF64ctWm2WOPD0qZ+Ho8yZ4QZZ3Sx /mgTsYem4JNpOKjwO/IdxU/Ocyp4nKeOmcK5H02G/MdUh8Lg0gu/N9EwCQPhFgMUCbnw hHLd8IzNzis1wD1Yx0ca5HxpjhgNzd6mE/PrFL8OsIMuFEL5r+7ulalep8P3ceFvEBhF T+pOqVwhK4rMICFOnfDh2et33Gi7rbLb78Wx5g0AMbeg/RK7SMYVpxq3Fn0xQB3AqPV4 p+9Eea7b+goHnBuYLpodMJgoHFQGH6JoKtdU4Ixh+H/lZYTM4KsbeeRo8gB/wSxXX+zS 1oNQ== Received: by 10.68.226.99 with SMTP id rr3mr45298314pbc.48.1337400955039; Fri, 18 May 2012 21:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (d142-179-38-250.bchsia.telus.net. [142.179.38.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id py6sm14998907pbc.13.2012.05.18.21.15.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 May 2012 21:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:17:04 -0700 From: Andriy Babiy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: buildworld problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 04:15:55 -0000 Hi list: root#uname -a FreeBSD myhost 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Mar 23 20:00:59 PDT 2012 root@myhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root#cd /usr/obj root#chflags -R noschg * root#rm -rf * root#make buildworld ... cd /usr/src; MACHINE=i386 MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE_CPU="i686 mmx sse sse2" LD="ld -m elf_i386_fbsd -Y P,/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32" AS="as --32" MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/lib32 _SHLIBDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32 VERSION="FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64 900044" INSTALL="sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh" PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin CC="cc -m32 -march=nocona -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -isystem /usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include/ -L/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -B/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32" CXX="c++ -m32 -march=nocona -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -isystem /usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include/ -L/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -B/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32" LIBDIR=/usr/lib32 SHLIBDIR=/usr/lib32 make -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS -DCOMPAT_32BIT -DWITHOUT_BIND -DWITHOUT_MAN -DWITHOUT_INFO -DWITHOUT_HTML -DNO_CTF -DNO_LINT DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32 -f Makefile.inc1 par-cleandir "Makefile.inc1", line 160: CPUTYPE global should be set with ?=. *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error What might cause this error? Probably I'm missing something obvious. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 05:33:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F061065672 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 05:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garya@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EE08FC0C for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 05:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [12.32.36.74] (freshstart.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.74]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q4J5Xh4d094889 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:33:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from garya@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:33:43 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 18 May 2012 23:33:44 -0600 (MDT) Subject: ATI Radeon HD5500 driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 05:33:46 -0000 Trying to set up a new box 9.0-RELEASE w/ X; has ATI Radeon HD5500 card. X.org -config says: Missing output drivers. Configuration failed. From X.org I see one is supposed to get linux drivers from ati/amd, but this info is over 2 years old and http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/index.aspx only allows choices of drivers for windoze. Can anyone point me to a useable driver, or if these cards are essentially unusable, make a suggestion for a reliable card suitable for non-gaming (2-D) X work? Should one use an Nvidia card with the Linux 295.53 driver? Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 06:34:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1BA10656D0 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 06:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDEE8FC14 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 06:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so5266829pbb.13 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:34:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+gF4IIunudBviFRHwb5QlXWuzvzG8VostaZo0M9ZBQ=; b=rAHwXmTosYb4hVqzI/c+6HdIkRLS8rOL4DxE8Gl+tohopZeWZK8SvhXIM/YO8Ttuwd emfkdCHEAxKGqwlWZxeLz6O6eErdERwkFWd7T8A72jrf0tYN724K6b8eTAxuP3URF28v Z+elV+8Ty6uhQD5ZRtHkw/xl+86wKv5JzWZRhGYzYbsPCW1vjGBsNEzm6VeLcmnNGq/N GyOLcG2teblydj0R32amNdv92EVO5L3eT/iOoLqn94Lnx2jLZYB9txQLwwWJa8XlOpXb QK17QfjnXkknZgRG7ncaj2ugnVEXlEyJK5r4l4DNNKy1BbqCdmEvu+UImJ3T1WrdoApV Qy+w== Received: by 10.68.223.71 with SMTP id qs7mr10555781pbc.13.1337409274862; Fri, 18 May 2012 23:34:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id og6sm15327824pbb.42.2012.05.18.23.34.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 May 2012 23:34:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB74053.8090602@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:40:19 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: buildworld problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 06:34:35 -0000 On 05/18/2012 09:17 PM, Andriy Babiy wrote: > FreeBSD myhost 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Mar 23 20:00:59 > PDT 2012 root@myhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > root#cd /usr/obj > root#chflags -R noschg * > root#rm -rf * > root#make buildworld > ... > cd /usr/src; MACHINE=i386 MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE_CPU="i686 mmx sse > sse2" LD="ld -m elf_i386_fbsd -Y P,/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32" > AS="as --32" MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/lib32 I may be going over my head on this one:-) However to my understanding it seems, it is trying to build 32 bit on a amd 64bit install? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 07:50:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F1D1065670 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crashedzero@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255DA8FC0C for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3922735bkv.13 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 00:50:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:x-mailer:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a4ugT3gPpespijLy07Y09/I6LUfkioW1kzl62IP3fOI=; b=otGVrAYG7w0BME0EPFBjYJFV85/LFNkd4yiuzK4uRPo3ecf90o7+Vwh24Y912cIu6n DaXZnz4v5+PBp4X0/bJTNjLO8/geJsaBCEqq5zDAxccPFA1aQoHJvoM2Sh3ldRYAzIaw rGQZHKiWYiEbRVpXuKHArgvigNm/KYpU+gCeJj/CBU7uSutJF8YHCEyTcug7FudpVWnF KowdupGYYxwMLzzo4tOhwww0GnDuCPhBC76uKWPmESGlIiOMY49MomWFffS/iDShe2qe 5/eesXCJmnYv0DeebFBkmUkqUj6NTYKyQJPEoKqqt+Wrsc0DVITtDhbw6O1Qu5ZMfCf/ fnIg== Received: by 10.204.132.77 with SMTP id a13mr5189207bkt.76.1337413814994; Sat, 19 May 2012 00:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Space.cool.net ([178.217.67.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n17sm20142423bkw.5.2012.05.19.00.50.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 May 2012 00:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:48:17 +0900 From: Crashed zero X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.26) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <982970762.20120519164817@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Release notifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 07:50:16 -0000 Hello. I'm working on automation of notifications about OS releases through talennsy notification service. As I can see you have an rss channel, but it's not only about releases. Do you have a channel where you announcing ONLY releases of new versions? With best regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 08:16:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFD9106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:16:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88DA8FC16 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4J8G7kH044435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 19 May 2012 09:16:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4J8G7kH044435 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4J8G7kH044435; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4FB756BF.3070909@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 10:15:59 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Crashed zero References: <982970762.20120519164817@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <982970762.20120519164817@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB92DCF0C6A97C3677749B354" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Release notifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 08:16:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB92DCF0C6A97C3677749B354 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/05/2012 09:48, Crashed zero wrote: > I'm working on automation of notifications about OS releases through > talennsy notification service. As I can see you have an rss channel, > but it's not only about releases. Do you have a channel where you > announcing ONLY releases of new versions? Unfortunately no. The closest things are the security updates channel at http://www.freebsd.org/security/rss.xml or the E-mail Announcements list -- see http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-announce However the security RSS feed doesn't carry announcements of new major releases: only of security updates to the supported release branches. The freebsd-announce mailing list covers more than just new releases, but it is pretty low traffic and release announcements + securitty updates make up a good fraction of the traffic. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigB92DCF0C6A97C3677749B354 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+3VsYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIztJwCfSl8+wcTkbf/b8HeB0C0kJQDi f/0An20qYQi2cwvnGl8GgxKyYyCTzORl =rwDj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB92DCF0C6A97C3677749B354-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 09:03:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A905106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 09:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andriybabiy@telus.net) Received: from defout.telus.net (defout.telus.net [204.209.205.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF748FC0A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 09:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edmwcm03 ([204.209.205.31]) by priv-edmwes48.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20120519082803.MIHE11384.priv-edmwes48.telusplanet.net@edmwcm03> for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 02:28:03 -0600 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([142.179.38.250]) by edmwcm03 with bizsmtp id BkU21j00e5Ppoyu01kU2zh; Sat, 19 May 2012 02:28:03 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=3felTBVTKDV4kUdUbqJShFvbTikv5tYY+WRXPduaGmg= c=1 sm=2 a=LGgl8L9ij00A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=rF3O6B-FGIHx3sNzgMYA:9 a=TYOpGHxxJqJNLg0KBc0A:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Telus-Outbound-IP: 142.179.38.250 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 01:29:19 -0700 From: Andriy Babiy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120519012919.42724cb4@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <4FB74053.8090602@gmail.com> References: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> <4FB74053.8090602@gmail.com> Organization: home-REBEKAH X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: buildworld problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:03:06 -0000 > > FreeBSD myhost 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Mar 23 > > 20:00:59 PDT 2012 root@myhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > amd64 > > > > root#cd /usr/obj > > root#chflags -R noschg * > > root#rm -rf * > > root#make buildworld > > ... > > cd /usr/src; MACHINE=i386 MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE_CPU="i686 mmx > > sse sse2" LD="ld -m elf_i386_fbsd -Y > > P,/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32" AS="as --32" > > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/lib32 > > I may be going over my head on this one:-) > However to my understanding it seems, it is trying to build 32 > bit on a amd 64bit install? > Since 7.0 I upgraded this machine via buildworld. It was always amd64. As you see in uname output, I upgraded it from 8.X to 9.0 with no problem. Time/date is in sync. I don't see any problems in the system I am running, but I got latest code changes for SSL and wanted to do as usual per instructions. On i386 machine everything worked fine, and I don't suspect the code changes are causing it; there must be something simple I miss. In make.conf I have CPUTYPE=nocona and perl version, and obviously clang related definitions. In the error above I see -DCOMPAT_32 string which might be the case for building 32 compatibility libraries for amd64, but it still doesn't explain what fails and why. Any ideas? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 10:05:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C544E1065692 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 10:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EAD8FC0C for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 10:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so5402534pbb.13 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 03:05:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HUvpzGlWnv2dkrtD6z3s3KdKdiGWu0YD6RTJD4dPbA0=; b=o9rAVJGZQUCadKRqVYY4+Q4POJSI75snCxH8Fs3bbH7Tr+YXXXeQKp0d8KpQDaZWCv VKavu01cR1F6JFQc1Y4i7X8gXs46vnqnsFr+LJeo2iHr7K5s4AdPP9a4DfnZIGWylzFy HNZaqK3j64XIwl0EDUzjcfBKEClDyA1HUBv2P6I1d52GS8sOXxmKo0fVF7FXIXKpQwaQ O5UU88hG4rSfTD2dIlTkdRf/o0n/cISUhqmC/Gusurb+flYZbZxRh7fBh96eii4rRI6l J8rcHPViiJOXJynMZVIarxj54QOGNl6HM+Y2y1xA4kfC5ZXR2NDEkhYfmRTcgXZ2e20w /iuA== Received: by 10.68.233.165 with SMTP id tx5mr733274pbc.11.1337421926936; Sat, 19 May 2012 03:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pe2sm6343867pbc.59.2012.05.19.03.05.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 May 2012 03:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB771BE.4030909@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 03:11:10 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: buildworld problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 10:05:27 -0000 On 05/18/2012 09:17 PM, Andriy Babiy wrote: > Makefile.inc1", line 160: CPUTYPE global should be set with ?= I think the problem is the wrong cpu type define. . I took a glance at the code in the makefile.inc1 to see what would set that error off and i found this in the makefile.inc1 if cpu type does not equal target_cputype then throw that error. .if ${_CPUTYPE} != ${_TARGET_CPUTYPE} .error CPUTYPE global should be set with ?=. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 11:24:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B53106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5DD8FC08 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JBOlRV099939 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:24:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JBOlmR099936 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:24:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:24:47 +0200 (CEST) From: User Wojtek To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 13:24:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:24:56 -0000 [wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0 [Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument (elements.cxx).javaldx failed! terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' compiled fine, installed without problems jdk 1.6 too. any ideas? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 11:48:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707CC106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32BF8FC0A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JBlcFG042052; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:47:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JBlbSf042024; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:47:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:47:37 +0200 (CEST) From: User Wojtek To: tess lamont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 13:47:38 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD 9.0-R installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:48:03 -0000 > the system setup menu, the boot menu shows that "freebsd90" is the first (and > only) bootable hard drive. > > Yet when I try to install FreeBSD 9.0-R, FreeBSD ignores the hardware RAID > and sees the two separate drives, instead of seeing a single logical drive. > good lesson to NEVER use this pseudo-RAID interfaces and use gmirror instead. not only you can make more complex RAID setup, get higher performance from gmirror and be always able to access data independently of "hardware" RAID onboard which is just normal controller. Just don't use BIOS RAID ever. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 11:48:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2557106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83D98FC25 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JBmMUJ042749; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:48:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JBmIsi042690; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:48:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:48:18 +0200 (CEST) From: User Wojtek To: Robert Bonomi In-Reply-To: <201205182359.q4INx9YI050576@mail.r-bonomi.com> Message-ID: References: <201205182359.q4INx9YI050576@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 13:48:22 +0200 (CEST) Cc: tesla@sunset.tx.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD 9.0-R installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:48:47 -0000 > FreeBSD will use a hardware RAID device -only- if the particular type of > RAID chip/chipset/controller is known to the included device drivers. do not use "hardware RAID" for such things as this is nothing else than normal controller and BIOS/driver support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 12:17:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA901065674 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 12:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396418FC1C for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 12:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 May 2012 08:17:12 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BMO82272; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:17:12 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 May 2012 08:17:06 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20407.36673.377695.996089@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 08:17:05 -0400 To: Gary Aitken In-Reply-To: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> References: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ATI Radeon HD5500 driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 12:17:19 -0000 Gary Aitken writes: > Trying to set up a new box 9.0-RELEASE w/ X; has ATI Radeon HD5500 card. > > X.org -config says: > Missing output drivers. Configuration failed. I do not have this card/chip; I have a HD3300. Having installed xf86-video-radeonhd-1.3.0.5, 'device "radeon"' works for me. Does this help? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 12:24:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D3C1065675 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 12:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258968FC14 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 12:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q4JCPxkH063784; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:25:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 07:25:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205191225.q4JCPxkH063784@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl In-Reply-To: Cc: tesla@sunset.tx.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD 9.0-R installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 12:24:25 -0000 > From wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Sat May 19 06:51:00 2012 > Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:48:18 +0200 (CEST) > From: User Wojtek > To: Robert Bonomi > cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tesla@sunset.tx.net > Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by > FreeBSD 9.0-R installation > > > FreeBSD will use a hardware RAID device -only- if the particular type of > > RAID chip/chipset/controller is known to the included device drivers. > > do not use "hardware RAID" for such things as this is nothing else > than normal controller and BIOS/driver support. 'Male bovine excrement' applies. I used 'hardware RAID' because that is -precisely- how the OP described their equipment. And Dell does offer at least one such controller. That aside, my statement is entirely accurate, _as_written_, regardless of the hardwaare that the OP has. Now, I'll grant it is possible that you know more about the OP's equipment than I do, but _I_ will assume that the OP knows what they are talking bout, with regard to -their- hardware configuration. Further, I, personally, have a fairly similar Compaq machine, which has hardware RAID, with it's own BIOS (including configuration/setup screens). Oh, yes, FreeBSD _does_ recognize the raid volumes -- with NO RAID support whatsoever in the O/S itself. I run full-custom kernels with no loadable modules, I _know_ what capbilites are/aren't present. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 13:27:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC33106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from networkaholic@gmx.de) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8557C8FC16 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVjgx-0002KJ-H4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 May 2012 06:27:31 -0700 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Beastie-Boy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:27:32 -0000 Hi folks, i ran into problems keeping my ports-collection up to date. Although i did a portsnap fet and install i think there are obsolete an old ports still on the disk. I tried to compile a programm and it complained about an older version of a depending package. I deleted the whole ports-dir, did the fetch and extract again, problem persists still. Yes, i searched all the forums and read a lot about managing ports and packages. Right now i am stuck. So, how do i delete really *all* ports and *all* packages at once? Is it possible with doing a fectch and extract having the latest ports? I was recommended to use only portmaster and not to use sysinstall after a finished installation. Well, i dont know. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/stay-up-to-date-with-ports-and-packages-problem-tp5709999.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 13:55:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6216106566C; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887BC8FC0A; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1SVk7m-0005Vf-TI>; Sat, 19 May 2012 15:55:15 +0200 Received: from e178020111.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.20.111] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1SVk7m-00067T-Kt>; Sat, 19 May 2012 15:55:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4FB7A63C.70509@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:55:08 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3FE2B60471D4EF092A7F9CC9" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.20.111 Cc: Subject: CURRENT: buildworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:55:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3FE2B60471D4EF092A7F9CC9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since approx. a week for now, I can not build FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 anymore! This happens to be on ALL(!) FreeBSD 10 boxes around here I maintain. Build is usually performed with CLANG, but also legacy gcc 4.2.1 build do fail. The error is always the same, as documented below. I allow to build with "WITH_BSD_SORT" in /etc/src.conf. CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS are set to -pipe -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=3Dnative when compiling with CLANG, otherwise the standard is used= as introduced by the vanilla sources. What I tried so far: a) build and install kernel -> works b) build and install /usr/src/lib via "make clean cleandepend depend obj all install" doesn't work anymore, it fails with =2E"/usr/src/lib/Makefile", line 179: Malformed conditional (${MK_NAND} != =3D "no") "/usr/src/lib/Makefile", line 181: if-less endif c) make installincludes from /usr/src works. But it doesn't relief as I hoped. As the error below may suggest, there seems to be an issue with the libstc++ lib. Building ports also fails due to errors refering to libstdc++.so. I feel helpless at the moment since the problem seems only to be sticky with me around here. Do others around here also allow the build of new C++ stuff with WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=3D YES in /etc/src.conf? Regards, Oliver [...] clang++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -pipe -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=3Dnative -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-conversion -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-parentheses -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/lib -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf -o gperf bool-array.o hash-table.o input.o keyword-list.o keyword.o main.o options.o output.o positions.o search.o version.o getline.o hash.o /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_ifstream >::is_open() const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_string, std::allocator >::_Rep::_M_set_length_and_sharable(unsigned long= )' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_check_length(unsigned long, unsigned long, char const*) const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_fstream >::is_open() const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_istream >::ignore()' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_copy(wchar_t*, wchar_t const*, unsigned lon= g)' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::string::_M_assign(char*, unsigned long, char)' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_ZNSt13basic_istreamIwSt11char_traitsIwEE6ignoreEv@GLIBCXX_3.4' changed from 243 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so to 211 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_fstream >::is_open() const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_move(wchar_t*, wchar_t const*, unsigned lon= g)' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE4_Rep26_M_set_length_and_sharableEm@GLIBC= XX_3.4' changed from 19 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so to 24 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::string::_M_move(char*, char const*, unsigned long)' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::istream::ignore()' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_ZNKSs15_M_check_lengthEmmPKc@GLIBCXX_3.4' changed from 39 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so to 36 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_ofstream >::is_open() const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_assign(wchar_t*, unsigned long, wchar_t)' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_ZNKSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE15_M_check_lengthEmmPKc@GLIBCXX_3.4' changed from 39 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so to 36 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_ZNSi6ignoreEv@GLIBCXX_3.4' changed from 243 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so to 211 in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_ifstream >::is_open() const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::string::_M_copy(char*, char const*, unsigned long)' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::basic_ofstream >::is_open() const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::string::_M_check_length(unsigned long, unsigned long, char const*) const' /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libstdc++.so:(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `std::string::_Rep::_M_set_length_and_sharable(unsigned lon= g)' clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) *** [gperf] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu. *** [gnu.all__D] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** [everything] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** [buildworld] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. --------------enig3FE2B60471D4EF092A7F9CC9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPt6ZCAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8YSMIALl1kI1bcHLZjXYtCNgI6ecY RpRhREoxTpD5fnJGjvBn0TJ6NoMClYB3x8NF3y1dx7OX789XRHpu8RWmpYe5MrWk pIaQTyRSfUYi2CcdR5fb9wfu0V8FhXrXiaPalT9PNoQkFmBrPC7q/TZEUD6gSJTA yaOoVK65YPzsa2WFrJWSxvWlVkCTbKJet2deWTIyrWTVsf4rPkpwe6Jf5/uZ1EY+ 1VbUb81wl2fEcl3D8TqeFgqBAZhoKVQzd+NtaYNZP01nFs7j0evR3tHXbZMBXpXw kzC7GPTsXfWMRn0IVUcyDSk6gh6lIyckB2CcZRVM6DUDyAe75Prl2qJrjHG6omg= =3FaR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3FE2B60471D4EF092A7F9CC9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 13:58:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973501065670 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9EF8FC15 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JDwRtr089203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 19 May 2012 14:58:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4JDwRtr089203 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4JDwRtr089203; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:58:17 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beastie-Boy References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3A927B9260673F4CE9BDDE52" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:58:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3A927B9260673F4CE9BDDE52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/05/2012 15:27, Beastie-Boy wrote: > i ran into problems keeping my ports-collection up to date. > Although i did a portsnap fet and install i think there are obsolete an= old > ports still on the disk. portsnap will synchronise your ports tree with what is in the FreeBSD CVS repo. The way it works, you shouldn't get any old ports left cluttering up /usr/ports unless things have gone very wrong. In which case portsnap would be emitting all sorts of error messages and the fact that there was a problem would be obvious. > I tried to compile a programm and it complained about an older version = of a > depending package. OK. This is a conceptual thing. The ports tree (ie. /usr/ports) is a set of *instructions* for how to build and install ports. portsnap will update all those instructions in the ports tree, but to update the actual ports you have installed requires use of a different software package. > I deleted the whole ports-dir, did the fetch and extract again, problem= > persists still. Yep. I hope you can see from what I wrote above how doing that wouldn't solve the problem you are seeing. > Yes, i searched all the forums and read a lot about managing ports and > packages. > Right now i am stuck. > So, how do i delete really *all* ports and *all* packages at once? That's a bit drastic and pretty much something you'ld never actually want to do in normal usage. However, for completeness' sake: # pkg_delete -af will remove all installed ports. After doing that there should be hardly anything left under /usr/local -- most of what's left would be config files in /usr/local/etc. But don't do that. It is a big waste of time and completely unnecessary.= > Is it possible with doing a fectch and extract having the latest ports?= > I was recommended to use only portmaster and not to use sysinstall afte= r a > finished installation. > Well, i dont know. The advice to use portmaster is good. A typical session to maintain all your ports goes something like this: # portsnap fetch update (Gets the latest contents for /usr/ports) # less /usr/ports/UPDATING (Check for any special instructions affecting any ports you have installed. Assuming nothing out of the ordinary is required (and it usually isn't), then...) # pkg_version -vIL=3D (see what needs updating) # portmaster -a (update everything out of date) and that's it. It's not particularly hard to do, although it can be time consuming, and very occasionally something will glitch out. If you wait a day or so and then try again the glitch will probably have been fixed. You'll find updates are more likely to run smoothly if you do them like this regularly -- monthly should be adequate -- plus immediate updates of anything portaudit reports has security problems.) Your original problem -- a port not installing because of an out of date dependency -- can be easily cured by: # portmaster category/example where category/example is the port's directory path under /usr/ports. This will update all dependencies as required before installing category/example. If you are still experiencing problems, please save a transcript of your updating session and put it on a pastebin site, and then ask again here with a link to the transcript. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig3A927B9260673F4CE9BDDE52 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+3pwIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxfZgCglZUHANDObMa+OpT2jRMy2m/Y wS0An3PBaoh0Ywl7lwsjqw/FNXIT8Dr5 =vUdY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3A927B9260673F4CE9BDDE52-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 14:01:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF331065676 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF7C8FC0A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JE11J7030724; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:01:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JE0wOJ030721; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:01:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 08:00:58 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken In-Reply-To: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 08:01:01 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATI Radeon HD5500 driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:01:04 -0000 On Fri, 18 May 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: > Trying to set up a new box 9.0-RELEASE w/ X; has ATI Radeon HD5500 card. > > X.org -config says: > Missing output drivers. Configuration failed. > > From X.org I see one is supposed to get linux drivers from ati/amd, > but this info is over 2 years old and > http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/index.aspx > only allows choices of drivers for windoze. > > Can anyone point me to a useable driver, or if these cards are essentially > unusable, make a suggestion for a reliable card suitable for non-gaming (2-D) > X work? The radeon driver wants KMS for cards later than the 4000 series. A few of the 5000 series may somewhat work with the existing UMS driver, but most do not. KMS for Intel video is being worked on and already being used, but AFAIK work has not even begun for the Radeons. > Should one use an Nvidia card with the Linux 295.53 driver? A Radeon 4650 works fine with the current radeon driver. The Nvidia cards are faster with the FreeBSD version of their proprietary driver, ...but it's a proprietary driver. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 14:07:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0492C106566B; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21998FC1A; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JE7h4P030777; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:07:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JE7hIC030774; Sat, 19 May 2012 08:07:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 08:07:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 08:07:43 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Beastie-Boy Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:07:45 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: > That's a bit drastic and pretty much something you'ld never actually > want to do in normal usage. However, for completeness' sake: > > # pkg_delete -af > > will remove all installed ports. After doing that there should be > hardly anything left under /usr/local -- most of what's left would be > config files in /usr/local/etc. The -f is probably not needed. I've done this rarely enough to not recall, but -a should sort everything in the right order so dependencies are uninstalled in order. > The advice to use portmaster is good. > > A typical session to maintain all your ports goes something like this: > > # portsnap fetch update (Gets the latest contents for > /usr/ports) > # less /usr/ports/UPDATING (Check for any special > instructions affecting any > ports you have installed. > Assuming nothing out of the > ordinary is required (and it > usually isn't), then...) > # pkg_version -vIL= (see what needs updating) > # portmaster -a (update everything out of date) portmaster can show ports that can be updated: portmaster -L --index-only Or, more concisely: portmaster -L --index-only | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' There's a short overview of port upgrading procedures and reasoning at http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/portupgrade.html . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 14:31:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662891065674 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02248FC12 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JEUxG0000703; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:30:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JEUwcj000700; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:30:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:30:58 +0200 (CEST) From: User Wojtek To: Robert Bonomi In-Reply-To: <201205191225.q4JCPxkH063784@mail.r-bonomi.com> Message-ID: References: <201205191225.q4JCPxkH063784@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 16:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Cc: tesla@sunset.tx.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD 9.0-R installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:31:11 -0000 > > I used 'hardware RAID' because that is -precisely- how the OP described > their equipment. unfortunately this is true - it is DESCRIBED as such. lie is standard tool in todays IT marketing. What are facts: - very few controllers actually have some RAID support. those usually have onboard RAM in substantial amount and preferably - battery backed. - unless you need RAID-5,6 or similar hardware cannot speed it up much. - gmirror/gstripe in FreeBSD is vastly superior to any RAID including true hardware ones - if configured properly. unless you treat single-process sequential read as measure of performance. even graid5 (from ports) is close to, or even outperform true hardware RAID, but CPU load is substantial. - RAID hardware does not allow any flexibility, like partitioning disks and using different RAID styles for parts. very useful. - with FreeBSD software RAID you will be able to access your data in every computer with SATA port. That's simple. > And Dell does offer at least one such controller. Yes true. Actually all recently bought servers i have to manage are Dells (yes their 24-hour warranty replacement on place actually work!). And i always make sure no "hardware" RAID is present :), to get best performance. Actually i told Dell marketer i will be recommending hardware RAID solution for Dell when he prove it will actually outperform my software RAID10 setup with same amount of same disks. Still not proved ;) Of course you have to properly configure both "hardware" and software RAID. > The cases where true hardware RAID may help is it's battery backup write-buffer that consume forced syncs (database commits etc) when they are common. still if it is an issue it means than database software is really badly designed if it have to sync constantly. But if there is no choice, today there are simple solutions like small-size SLC flash drive or battery backed ramdisk in extreme cases. > Further, I, personally, have a fairly similar Compaq machine, which has > hardware RAID, with it's own BIOS (including configuration/setup screens). what is the chip that you say it is hardware RAID? I dare to not believe you, but possibly you are right. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 14:40:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84F7106566B; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F22D8FC0C; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj8 with SMTP id hj8so836609wib.13 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:40:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W1qP9qSPPajf1uVPxkUbcZPnFCn0n61vxscc0k3UOvE=; b=kwHVObVcPnILADaYteCDT/Nc6b6W7Cg3xSD+LpPxoM7mm8det5By9O/4bE2QpgaTWJ IvYWJNntGYgm/11PD/TVALH/oEAF6DAY23yeGVpMNmi7+Vs292Mb9E1aoH4XBExnNgx+ PYCljguvI3QdcCVN6SX1MCddUzY3dAFBaIHuEYdFfSanQk75F61JLp4GtSvAMRuW8z5B xd58wPgQlRNxIgM1EO9OGDOkdn8cNAKr10V2cSkPqkN9r/4ewvz/7ndxzEGQgelUS3Z/ 5h0NhkVfCpQa1PBLh0RFyrt4rwcOiDZln6fFw8o46qGpZoMgFFn0hAEbCDeWndWOlxYc uNHw== Received: by 10.216.200.22 with SMTP id y22mr5423146wen.118.1337438414239; Sat, 19 May 2012 07:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.jennejohn.org (p578E0D2F.dip.t-dialin.net. [87.142.13.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o9sm15314014wia.3.2012.05.19.07.40.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 May 2012 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:40:11 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20120519164011.3afd508d@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4FB7A63C.70509@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4FB7A63C.70509@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT: buildworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:40:16 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012 15:55:08 +0200 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > Since approx. a week for now, I can not build FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 > anymore! This happens to be on ALL(!) FreeBSD 10 boxes around here I > maintain. > Build is usually performed with CLANG, but also legacy gcc 4.2.1 build > do fail. > > The error is always the same, as documented below. > > I allow to build with "WITH_BSD_SORT" in /etc/src.conf. > > CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS are set to -pipe -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing > -march=native when compiling with CLANG, otherwise the standard is used > as introduced by the vanilla sources. > > What I tried so far: > > a) build and install kernel -> works > b) build and install /usr/src/lib via "make clean cleandepend depend obj > all install" doesn't work anymore, it fails with > ."/usr/src/lib/Makefile", line 179: Malformed conditional (${MK_NAND} != > "no") > "/usr/src/lib/Makefile", line 181: if-less endif > > c) make installincludes from /usr/src works. But it doesn't relief as I > hoped. > > As the error below may suggest, there seems to be an issue with the > libstc++ lib. > Building ports also fails due to errors refering to libstdc++.so. > > I feel helpless at the moment since the problem seems only to be sticky > with me around here. Do others around here also allow the build of new > C++ stuff with > WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS= YES > in /etc/src.conf? > [snip error output] I just successfully did ``make buildworld'' and ``make buildkernel'' on HEAD updated about 4 hours ago. This is a 6-core AMD64 system. I have WITH_BSD_SORT defined but I DO NOT have WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS defined in /etc/src.conf. I'm also using the stock gcc in base and not clang. HTH. -- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 15:59:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4C71065677 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 15:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C308FC08 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 15:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JFx358091348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 19 May 2012 16:59:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4JFx358091348 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4JFx358091348; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4FB7C336.8030709@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:58:46 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8D4E9917263F109296E213D0" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, Beastie-Boy Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:59:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8D4E9917263F109296E213D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/05/2012 16:07, Warren Block wrote: > The -f is probably not needed. I've done this rarely enough to not > recall, but -a should sort everything in the right order so dependencie= s > are uninstalled in order. I find that 'pkg_delete -af' gives more reliable results. Agreed, it should not be necessary but sometimes the dependency relationships between ports aren't generated quite right, and '-f' just lets pkg_delete do its thing without worrying about that -- not that dependency ordering matters at all when you're deleting everything in any case. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig8D4E9917263F109296E213D0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+3w0cACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwH2QCgj0curUiJ/oMUV7mievzUEqrJ p6AAoIAltXHGITsA+KSdQBUXCglBiRP3 =88Rz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8D4E9917263F109296E213D0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 16:15:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C629106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomdean@speakeasy.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8E78FC16 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C59A72E8E for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 12:15:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 30542 invoked from network); 19 May 2012 16:15:03 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 24345, pid: 23705, t: 0.1548s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from 24-113-107-31.wavecable.com (HELO [192.168.2.3]) (tomdean@[24.113.107.31]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 May 2012 16:15:03 -0000 Message-ID: <4FB7C70D.3040305@speakeasy.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:15:09 -0700 From: tomdean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> <4FB771BE.4030909@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FB771BE.4030909@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail6.sea5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=disabled version=3.0.4 Subject: Re: buildworld problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:15:10 -0000 On 5/19/2012 3:11 AM, Edward M wrote: Try 'env -i make buildworld' after cleaning obj. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 16:18:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4CC1065670 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FDA8FC14 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6129C299D2; Sat, 19 May 2012 12:18:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FB7C7DD.5060906@cyberleo.net> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:18:37 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120513 Thunderbird/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Babiy References: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> <4FB74053.8090602@gmail.com> <20120519012919.42724cb4@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <20120519012919.42724cb4@telus.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:18:44 -0000 On 05/19/2012 03:29 AM, Andriy Babiy wrote: >>> "Makefile.inc1", line 160: CPUTYPE global should be set with ?=. ... > In make.conf I have CPUTYPE=nocona As it says, you need CPUTYPE?=nocona instead of CPUTYPE=nocona in /etc/make.conf or /etc/src.conf; otherwise the build process chokes while building the 32-bit compatibility stuff, since it cannot override your 64-bit CPU selection with a 32-bit one. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 17:44:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE6A106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 17:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3D38FC15 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 17:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so5692750pbb.13 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 10:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mxk9WLLArTyvPbCX7Aea6OkiubBBRCTGpDsRSrPqF4A=; b=ufXndZvoc+nH6JVMXGW3WlJxop5UYPsxBqnMEPvXjXSJdCRoRbXii7k8wcyYqhNnmE YraakNTeOSZ3soS2vn3qrMzD8WeuhrqLmrVIQ4p4Do098rNpYATEIRJ/7Y+H/5rxylq9 b7syv6WAa0Mnv6anh2RA3w5GN4N9EzqFyAaZeeYjFPqYUPZJd5WYiJYKJqDVTOl7/oKw BCzuY2/eYoJU5mewpubJWx9qGHNDjObERwTW64lTpUTCzef2XTk2r/zYHUPe1ZEREb5v mECD3bgcD4a2UEWYwIBKG88J8o5gbHU5KKGzpRFwcCS+vwi8geEK1o6jZs5KE+QxO4mJ BsZg== Received: by 10.68.220.100 with SMTP id pv4mr52253198pbc.116.1337449479040; Sat, 19 May 2012 10:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rj4sm16905751pbc.30.2012.05.19.10.44.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 May 2012 10:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB7DD60.2010305@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 10:50:24 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120518211704.3ad0afe3@gmail.com> <4FB74053.8090602@gmail.com> <20120519012919.42724cb4@telus.net> <4FB7C7DD.5060906@cyberleo.net> In-Reply-To: <4FB7C7DD.5060906@cyberleo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: buildworld problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:44:39 -0000 On 05/19/2012 09:18 AM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > As it says, you need CPUTYPE?=nocona instead of CPUTYPE=nocona in > /etc/make.conf or /etc/src.conf; otherwise the build process chokes > while building the 32-bit compatibility stuff, since it cannot override > your 64-bit CPU selection with a 32-bit one. Just learned something new:-) had a look in share/examples/etc/make.conf file and i noticed this # (?= allows to buildworld for a different CPUTYPE.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 17:59:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833C91065670 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 17:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9A98FC0C for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 17:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [12.32.36.74] (freshstart.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.74]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q4JHx2HP097133; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:59:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <4FB7DF67.1000603@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:59:03 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sat, 19 May 2012 11:59:03 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATI Radeon HD5500 driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:59:04 -0000 Ok... I tried the xf86-video-radeonhd driver, to no avail. Then tried xf86-video-ati-6.14.3 with marginally better results. Using the ati driver, which reports that it works for the HD5500, Xorg hobbles and writes a config file. When it attempts to start, the log shows a boatload of information stuff, a few warnings, and finally (EE) RADEON(0): Acceleration initialization failed (II) Acceleration disabled After which I'm left with the tail of the log file on the display, but no prompt, and X is still running. That is the only EE posted. Questions: 1. Since the driver notes that Acceleration was disabled, but there are no other errors, shouldn't the driver work in dumb frame buffer mode? (Hoping to get something hobbling along...) Or is this the result of the need for KMS and I'm SOL? 2. Since the server didn't exit, is it actually pretending to run? Shouldn't I be seeing the standard X grey hatched background? Or is the server running, but the driver isn't passing bits on appropriately? 3. The Xorg man page notes that should cause it to exit. However, it doesn't, and I had to use kill -TERM. Any hints on why doesn't cause it to exit? On 5/19/2012 8:00 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: > >> Trying to set up a new box 9.0-RELEASE w/ X; has ATI Radeon HD5500 card. >> >> X.org -config says: >> Missing output drivers. Configuration failed. >> >> From X.org I see one is supposed to get linux drivers from ati/amd, >> but this info is over 2 years old and >> http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/index.aspx >> only allows choices of drivers for windoze. >> >> Can anyone point me to a useable driver, or if these cards are >> essentially unusable, make a suggestion for a reliable card suitable >> for non-gaming (2-D) X work? > > The radeon driver wants KMS for cards later than the 4000 series. A few > of the 5000 series may somewhat work with the existing UMS driver, but > most do not. > > KMS for Intel video is being worked on and already being used, but AFAIK > work has not even begun for the Radeons. > >> Should one use an Nvidia card with the Linux 295.53 driver? > > A Radeon 4650 works fine with the current radeon driver. The Nvidia > cards are faster with the FreeBSD version of their proprietary driver, > ...but it's a proprietary driver. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 18:08:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DFC1065673 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from networkaholic@gmx.de) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9B48FC1D for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVo4h-0002Qj-V2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Beastie-Boy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:08:20 -0000 Ok, many thanks for your replies. I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE. That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk. The problem i had was that gdm, gnome didnt start after the upgrade. So i tried to build the gnome and gdm thing again via pkg_add(didnt work) and make install clean in ports(either). Right now i deleted all ports in /usr, deleted packages in /var and portsnaped me the all stuff again. After that i pkg_add -r gnome2 again and now it looks better. Before i had problems that package-1.2.3 is needed to build an only package-1.2.2 is installed. Sorry i cant paste logs, bsd is running on another machine. so long -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/stay-up-to-date-with-ports-and-packages-problem-tp5709999p5710066.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 18:43:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E58106566C for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCA68FC12 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so3184936wer.13 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6SF5LOEy0DMhfi68L5jcQw0fnNZpXUOTJCadFLNggGA=; b=h1cSbZ5edXZHuSrkanSWVBLVrYwA+zQYdTZQXxVMtjgqqZ1rTY6csRDfYEm+qXO9Jj IDUwX4D30NuHXyTiT470L3Bdl3C/oz+xXZ/qKM52X8eC71qFb4dtWAUtnw9t0bxT9AqV r1uZf7Wu7YLLyPg5/z1vIH09+pOjs79TnjIbvaMLbxfTwCJRap4ED6Un+TiRr2W8sWOR 9gB5DwHE+bVZt4yeyVQwn20j1tjRk0hk79sBWDKu7xFnkuXLIYTow04h5qXkrjLDoSTe DHJzg1XHUd1beH8KUe5PXAWGev4Qfx6oBKjSpCpcyCa1W2ZJuupIl1CXL30nd2VMZhuw KsrQ== Received: by 10.180.100.230 with SMTP id fb6mr11104879wib.3.1337452992263; Sat, 19 May 2012 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dg2sm17695413wib.4.2012.05.19.11.43.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 May 2012 11:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:43:09 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120519194309.756c19df@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:43:13 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Beastie-Boy wrote: > Ok, many thanks for your replies. > I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE. > That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk. When you cross a major OS release boundary, you need to force a rebuild of all installed package, or reinstall from package files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 19:00:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE358106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAB28FC08 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57593CC37; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:00:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4JJ08w1002632; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:00:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:00:08 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Message-Id: <20120519210008.f1721985.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4FB7DF67.1000603@dreamchaser.org> References: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> <4FB7DF67.1000603@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATI Radeon HD5500 driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:00:16 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:59:03 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > 1. Since the driver notes that Acceleration was disabled, but there are > no other errors, shouldn't the driver work in dumb frame buffer mode? > (Hoping to get something hobbling along...) Or is this the result of > the need for KMS and I'm SOL? Do you have drm/dri (direct renering) installed, port and kernel module? I've been using that with a ATI Radeon 9200 (I think, RV250, no HD) with excellent 2D and 3D results both with XFree86 and X.org - tested with excessive gaming. :-) > 2. Since the server didn't exit, is it actually pretending to run? Check using ps or top. > Shouldn't I be seeing the standard X grey hatched background? No. The default new background is plain black. Nothing to see. No grey pattern, no twm, nothing. And in case HAL and DBUS _or_ xorg.conf settings don't really match, you don't even see the X-shaped mouse cursor. > 3. The Xorg man page notes that should cause it to > exit. However, it doesn't, and I had to use kill -TERM. Any hints on > why doesn't cause it to exit? This is also a new default to _not_ work anymore. You have more than two (if I remember correctly) options in making it work. You'll find them in the Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html One possibility when X has been compiled _without_ HAL support (and no hald running), placing Option "DontZap" "false" into the "ServerLayout" section should work. Additionally, I see that I have Option "XkbOptions" "terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp" in the "InputDevice" section of "Keyboard0". It "just" works. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 19:01:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105951065670 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EFC8FC08 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2AA3CC39; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4JJ1mMT002653; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:48 +0200 From: Polytropon To: RW Message-Id: <20120519210148.a367fa7c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120519194309.756c19df@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120519194309.756c19df@gumby.homeunix.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:01:50 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012 19:43:09 +0100, RW wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT) > Beastie-Boy wrote: > > > Ok, many thanks for your replies. > > I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE. > > That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk. > > > When you cross a major OS release boundary, you need to force a rebuild > of all installed package, or reinstall from package files. It's often easy to do this using a port management tool. See "man portmaster" containing an example of exactly this procedure (EXAMPLES section). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 19:07:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3331065673 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034518FC0A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JJ7rCY095109 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 19 May 2012 20:07:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4JJ7rCY095109 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4JJ7rCY095109; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4FB7EF81.5080701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:07:45 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beastie-Boy References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF26455F864F4E0389AA9B512" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:07:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF26455F864F4E0389AA9B512 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/05/2012 20:08, Beastie-Boy wrote: > I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE. > That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk. Ahah! That is exactly the situation where you do want to remove all your installed ports and rebuild them. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigF26455F864F4E0389AA9B512 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+374gACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy/HQCcDBwV0roAFa2SAlc5Dq3NoXSo wfwAoI9ihxZtmlVfiLlupLOjZ5Upb2G+ =8I0W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF26455F864F4E0389AA9B512-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 19:09:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1991065692 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2C58FC16 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5098927A77; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:09:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4JJ9WVg002664; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:09:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:09:32 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Beastie-Boy Message-Id: <20120519210932.36b230cd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:09:40 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT), Beastie-Boy wrote: > Ok, many thanks for your replies. > I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE. > That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk. When you do such an update (major version number), you should always reinstall (update) your applications. You can avoid it by installing the compat-Nx-i386 or compat-Nx-amd64 ports (where N is the previously used major version number). You've found many advices on how to do that already from the list. > The problem i had was that gdm, gnome didnt start after the upgrade. That was to be expected. > So i tried to build the gnome and gdm thing again via pkg_add(didnt work) > and make install clean in ports(either). You should make sure _all_ dependencies get recompiled. Using a port management tool for this task often is more comfortable than dealing with the "bare ports" (but it basically is not wrong). > Right now i deleted all ports in /usr, deleted packages in /var and > portsnaped me the all stuff again. Depending on how you deleted, it _might_ be required to reconstruct the directory subtree /usr/local from the respective mtree file in /etc/mtree. If you _really_ intend to delete everything, make sure you have backups of config files, data files or your own modifications to something located in the local/ subtree (for example /usr/local/etc). > After that i pkg_add -r gnome2 again and now it looks better. Erm... when you're installing binary packages, you don't have to deal with ports at all. > Before i had problems that package-1.2.3 is needed to build an only > package-1.2.2 is installed. Correct, this happens when packages have lower version numbers (not totally up to date) than the respective port would have. That's why it's often a "good idea" to use _either_ ports _or_ packages (even though technically there is no problem mixing them). Again, allow me to mention port management tools. Using for example portmaster, many tasks are easier to perform than dealing with "bare ports". Even the use of precompiled packages (if desired) is possible. See "man portmaster" and its EXAMPLES section for inspiration. > Sorry i cant paste logs, bsd is running on another machine. You can use SSH to log into the BSD machine and cut text from the session. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 19:20:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F9C1065672 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37D98FC14 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JJKHN1095375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 19 May 2012 20:20:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q4JJKHN1095375 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q4JJKHN1095375; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host 209.Red-88-21-46.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.21.46.209] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4FB7F270.7050007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:20:16 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120519210932.36b230cd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120519210932.36b230cd.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig456937E4F95E934B87BF188C" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, Beastie-Boy Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:20:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig456937E4F95E934B87BF188C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/05/2012 21:09, Polytropon wrote: >> Sorry i cant paste logs, bsd is running on another machine. > You can use SSH to log into the BSD machine and cut text from > the session. :-) Or just run: % script /tmp/session.log Do all your updating tasks, then type 'exit' when done, and you'll get a transcript of everything displayed on your terminal in session.log Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig456937E4F95E934B87BF188C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+38nEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyJAgCfdGSdfPXmjBJBOUyZ3CfYckEQ ZMEAn3q71imM6fGPEVxbhlXBEDnt56Ou =VnPX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig456937E4F95E934B87BF188C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 20:33:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9F0106566B; Sat, 19 May 2012 20:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D5A8FC12; Sat, 19 May 2012 20:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so7800969obc.13 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:33:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LaStJm6P9Gg+AK8wQ9CLk6aeE66wWDkrBv7AINgOIhs=; b=uctbHjb1CzjDHqDxwS603g+jQ4aR5aoUE9MEf4CXRglCNDf3BCAKMIUJIeq8V0J8ZZ zHihCvGFkSxgtNBnYlr/MglKBVM/EB1+hFLJNwMY6FgDfBLcqEAhhJJdVNPqREh5bOUY 8byFD9+DCMlZyKWLAymi4i6wM0SApMayAu03LXvpk+dqXKyudwB009GRvcElHvvUQsvp XCfmsfgdDZE8w69tPjjBawOW0kQE7kMqJVGvnhmUmDMJzeGE9mHs1vYInuHKFqdVnQV8 HT61mOngXpGvIK/0x+5TSmlWTSTnrHoQFgow+k23zkMtlcGTNJrpDjJIRRB4OHwc9uhW b4Fg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.48.100 with SMTP id k4mr14248049obn.21.1337459600395; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.153.72 with HTTP; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:33:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB7A63C.70509@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4FB7A63C.70509@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:33:20 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT: buildworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 20:33:21 -0000 On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:55 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Since approx. a week for now, I can not build FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 > anymore! This happens to be on ALL(!) FreeBSD 10 boxes around here I > maintain. ... > b) build and install /usr/src/lib via "make clean cleandepend depend obj > all install" doesn't work anymore, it fails with > ."/usr/src/lib/Makefile", line 179: Malformed conditional (${MK_NAND} != > "no") > "/usr/src/lib/Makefile", line 181: if-less endif Your mk files in /usr/share/mk are out of synch with your build tree. If you opt out of using buildworld, then you need to do 'make -C share/mk install' beforehand. Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 21:04:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E272106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF31C8FC16 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4JKoRfv004185; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:50:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JKoR7V004181; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:50:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:50:27 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com X-X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120519210932.36b230cd.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <1337434051474-5709999.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FB7A6F9.2090202@FreeBSD.org> <1337450899955-5710066.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120519210932.36b230cd.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 16:50:28 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Beastie-Boy Subject: Re: stay up to date with ports and packages, problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:04:15 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT), Beastie-Boy wrote: >> Ok, many thanks for your replies. >> I forgot to tell that i recently upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0-RELEASE. >> That excplains maybe why i had obsolete/old packages/ports on my disk. > > When you do such an update (major version number), you should > always reinstall (update) your applications. You can avoid it > by installing the compat-Nx-i386 or compat-Nx-amd64 ports (where > N is the previously used major version number). > > You've found many advices on how to do that already from the > list. >> The problem i had was that gdm, gnome didnt start after the upgrade. > > That was to be expected. > >> So i tried to build the gnome and gdm thing again via pkg_add(didnt work) >> and make install clean in ports(either). > > You should make sure _all_ dependencies get recompiled. Using > a port management tool for this task often is more comfortable > than dealing with the "bare ports" (but it basically is not > wrong). There are two great tools for dealing with problems stemming from the update of a single port going bad: pkg_cleanup and pkg_tree. I prefer portmaster over portupdate because portmaster only uses the data that is there from building or adding port/packages. portmaster probably works better for me because I only update in response to a need or problem. I do not have enough time or computing power to build what is required for a workstation. I am using FreeBSD 9.0 and xfce 4.8. To get the functionality I had with KDE3.5 I ended up with 489 packages. I had hoped for a smaller number but that seems to be the norm for KDE or Gome. The only ports I built were a couple that insisted on installing an older version of perl and/or python. Everything else was via package add. In my experience this model only works near the front of a major release. As the lower level ports diverge updates must be built. Here pkg_cleanup is a great tool for taking a step back. Perhaps building regularly on a weekly basis and updating everying would work. For me after I get a functional system I only add new stuff. I do not remember having to reinstalling something because it did not work. Before someone pointed out pkg_cleanup I pretty completely broke my desktop (this in the 7.x days) just by upgrading firefox and then chasing the issues that came up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 21:14:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86150106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAACC8FC17 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 May 2012 21:14:37 -0000 Received: from c162163.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [213.39.162.163] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 19 May 2012 23:14:37 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+nqEN5AFCnJIyBf2mgsvTJs3ES/NpKUKyTKvWnQF 5Bz0LiWzdcRfaK Message-ID: <4FB80D3E.8020308@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:14:38 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Wojtek References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:14:39 -0000 On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote: > [wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0 > [Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument > (elements.cxx).javaldx failed! > terminate called after throwing an instance of > 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' > > > compiled fine, installed without problems jdk 1.6 too. > > any ideas? thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Google find many things with "javaldx failed". Is a problem with java, but different solutions (wrong xml, home permission, java- version ...). Hope you find a solution. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 21:19:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAEE1065691 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apache@s15434952.onlinehome-server.info) Received: from s15434952.onlinehome-server.info (s15434952.onlinehome-server.info [82.165.150.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F038FC16 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s15434952.onlinehome-server.info (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by s15434952.onlinehome-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1935D422FFE for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by s15434952.onlinehome-server.info (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5481E85341F; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:17:36 +0000 (UTC) To: questions@freebsd.org From: Sgt Larry Wayne MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20120519211736.5481E85341F@s15434952.onlinehome-server.info> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 22:17:36 +0100 (BST) Cc: Subject: Read Now X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: larrywn917@mail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:19:36 -0000 Hello, My name is Staff Sergeant Larry Wayne with a desperate need for an mutual business proposal that will benefit both of us, I have been lucky enough to come about some cash here in Afghanistan and i want to work with you to ship it out of this country and invest my own share into lucrative business with your advise and assistance, please get back to me if you are interested to hear Sgt Larry Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 21:28:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102FD106566C for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 592958FC08 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 May 2012 21:28:48 -0000 Received: from d180002.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.180.2] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 19 May 2012 23:28:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+hxr1cr52hRndNu8H5sm2TFeqE+IuUHDK4Rg9eob IMpAbUUDXvUeNq Message-ID: <4FB8108E.5010307@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:28:46 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?0JvRjtCx0L7QvNC40YAg0JPRgNC40LPQvtGA0L7Qsg==?= References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: alphachi , freebsd Subject: Re: Wine for Diablo 3 on FreeBSD 9.0R amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:28:50 -0000 On 05/17/12 07:54, Любомир Григоров wrote: > We have to wait, unfortunately. I am using a Linux partition with Wine > meanwhile. As long as it's not mainstream, it will be hard to do. Not to > mention port is at 1.4. FreeBSD have 2 wine- ports. :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=wine-1&stype=all&sektion=all wine for 1.4 and wine-devel for 1.5 But i can't help with Diablo 3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 21:30:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BE4106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F658FC0A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JLULsD000981; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:30:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JLUL91000971; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:30:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:30:21 +0200 (CEST) From: User Wojtek To: "lokadamus@gmx.de" In-Reply-To: <4FB80D3E.8020308@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <4FB80D3E.8020308@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 23:30:21 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:30:40 -0000 the problem is that what i found is not this. all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still same. On Sat, 19 May 2012, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote: >> [wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0 >> [Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument >> (elements.cxx).javaldx failed! >> terminate called after throwing an instance of >> 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' >> >> >> compiled fine, installed without problems jdk 1.6 too. >> >> any ideas? thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > Google find many things with "javaldx failed". > Is a problem with java, but different solutions (wrong xml, home permission, > java- version ...). > > Hope you find a solution. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 21:44:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19C4106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBA88FC0A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 21:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so5810746pbb.13 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:44:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JIz1/QWQsvKzXlJjjETX8eMd+vZz8yPgEZ6z93yNBSc=; b=h3WyswD+mODQoxh1UypFhHYtYFMSchIn6I+BE8X7DkB+9GUEo8z62CbCPgTB7F1xlj yxkJhP2rDQVrLtFizRWDVHiNdknFZd5l0qGmzK6h4WjFlIBTStQvWW/N3hVF0oJ3/jMI fhr59GSEwfs1CBsoHdbWTleBhcStx5WVSoZklCRnP3PiRotR5J11qUXpwg7Jj3soT5uj CFqMZzgjzyzdFQjSASB0AwOiRYoHMd3sD/qs5vZHIWR7/11lp2JGCh1+lwZ8w2b0FOzF Z3LrlxRIemZOlhhwrZuol64972HfbLN7Jjl4ggYW25AE0I4n4E5Kt80XDX4QlI0MHm+F f4Hw== Received: by 10.68.191.196 with SMTP id ha4mr18257063pbc.146.1337463874191; Sat, 19 May 2012 14:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wi8sm17449609pbc.11.2012.05.19.14.44.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 May 2012 14:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB8159B.7040008@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:50:19 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FB8108E.5010307@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4FB8108E.5010307@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Wine for Diablo 3 on FreeBSD 9.0R amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:44:35 -0000 On 05/19/2012 02:28 PM, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > On 05/17/12 07:54, Любомир Григоров wrote: >> We have to wait, unfortunately. I am using a Linux partition with Wine >> meanwhile. As long as it's not mainstream, it will be hard to do. Not to >> mention port is at 1.4. > FreeBSD have 2 wine- ports. :) > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=wine-1&stype=all&sektion=all > wine for 1.4 and wine-devel for 1.5 > > But i can't help with Diablo 3. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > a user is trying but at the moment is plague with wine errors. http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=15659 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 22:01:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9011065672 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 22:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3C78FC17 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 22:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from i7-quad-PC.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-142.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.142]) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4JM060T008462; Sat, 19 May 2012 17:00:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20120519165616.058306c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:59:52 -0500 To: David Banning , Chuck Swiger From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <20120518120716.GA28838@skytracker.ca> References: <20120516200837.GA63280@skytracker.ca> <70BC5C41-FD4F-4B57-86F8-8C48BA075EC1@mac.com> <20120518120716.GA28838@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120519-0, 05/19/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: q4JM060T008462 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with networking and route command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 22:01:35 -0000 At 07:07 AM 5/18/2012, David Banning wrote: > > > It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and > above that > > > can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole > > > lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands > > > without success. > > > > You need to implement NAT on this box, since 192.168.0.0/16 is an > RFC-1918 unrouteable private network range. > >I previously connected to the internet using ppp with the -nat option >and now my connection has changed - so that makes sense. > >So I implemented natd. > >Unfortunately natd does not work as yet. I followed the setup as laid >out in "man natd" and also used the layout in; > >http://www.freebsddiary.org/ipfw.php > >Here is my natd setup > >1. Compiled IPFIREWALL & IPDIVERT into my kernel - went fine. > >Here is my rc.conf network related entries; > >natd_enable="YES" >natd_interface="rl0" >natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" >gateway_enable="YES" >ifconfig_rl0="inet 64.40.244.36 netmask 255.255.255.240" >defaultrouter="64.40.244.33" >ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" >ifconfig_vr0=up >ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.1.1" >network_interfaces="rl0 vr0 lo0" >ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" >firewall_enable="YES" >firewall_script="/etc/firewall.rules" >firewall_type="simple" >firewall_logging="YES" >dhcpd_ifaces="vr0" >dhcpd_enable="YES" > >My firewall rules; > >ipfw add 64000 allow ip from any to any >ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via rl0 >ipfw add allow tcp from any to 192.168.2.1 139 >ipfw add allow tcp from any to 192.168.1.1 139 >ipfw add 6000 deny tcp from any to 64.40.244.36 139 >ipfw add 6010 deny tcp from any to 64.40.244.36 445 >ipfw add deny tcp from any to any 139 > >My /etc/natd.conf; > >interface rl0 >use_sockets yes >same_ports yes > >My /etc/services includes the line; > >natd 8668/divert # Network Address Translation socket > >Output of ifconfig; > ># ifconfig >fwe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > ether 02:11:d8:b3:0e:43 > ch 1 dma -1 >vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > inet6 fe80::16d6:4dff:fe47:88ae%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > ether 14:d6:4d:47:88:ae > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active >rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 64.40.244.36 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 64.40.244.47 > inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe66:7162%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > ether 00:11:95:66:71:62 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active >lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 >lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 >sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 >faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 > > >From my initial communication I have swapped the uses of the two network >cards - which explains the reversal of entries for devices vr0 and rl0. >Still I have server connection to the internet on rl0 and server >connection to the network on vr0 - but the network cannot connect >to the internet via rl0. > >If there are any commands that would help collect information leading >to the answer I would appreciate any feedback. > Try using the examples here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html That freebsddiary article is very old, and many versions ago. Essentially you need to forward the packets from your NAT'd private interface over to the interface on the internet. You can try this using an open firewall, sending all packets to test the setup. Then add rules to lock it down to only the ports you want to allow. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 23:03:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18AB106566B for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0268FC0A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:03:08 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 1209190c-b7fad6d000000920-80-4fb826acb7ae Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id CA.40.02336.CA628BF4; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q4JN38kY028189; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:03:08 -0400 Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q4JN36Kq000745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 19 May 2012 19:03:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id q4JN36xK006760; Sat, 19 May 2012 19:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:03:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20120516214416.GA14804@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: References: <20120514222724.GA5158@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20120516214416.GA14804@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrbtGbYe/wdNzqhYvv25isVh0LMKB yWPGp/ksHs+ORAQwRXHZpKTmZJalFunbJXBl7Lq3ibmgV7Ci63YXSwPjKd4uRk4OCQETiYbt zUwQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBPYxSlzYe4sJwtnAKPHuyCF2COcAk8TkM09YQFqEBBoYJfpPpncx cnCwCGhLzPmnCRJmE1CRmPlmIxuILSKgJvHuwxVmEJtZQFFiXdtzsG3CAhISS/YuAbM5BSwk Dux8B2bzCjhKXPk7iRVi1wxGiVsPWhlBEqICOhKr909hgSgSlDg5E+IGZgFLiXN/rrNNYBSc hSQ1C0lqASPTKkbZlNwq3dzEzJzi1GTd4uTEvLzUIl1DvdzMEr3UlNJNjOAwleTZwfjmoNIh RgEORiUe3suTtvkLsSaWFVfmHmKU5GBSEuVVV93hL8SXlJ9SmZFYnBFfVJqTWnyIUYKDWUmE l0EOKMebklhZlVqUD5OS5mBREudV0XrnJySQnliSmp2aWpBaBJOV4eBQkuB9CjJUsCg1PbUi LTOnBCHNxMEJMpwHaDiTGsjw4oLE3OLMdIj8KUZFKXFeAZCEAEgiozQPrheWRl4xigO9Iswr CFLFA0xBcN2vgAYzAQ2uZNsGMrgkESEl1cDow3nGreLInP1dT9/PP7dQjGGJw6b1URvbVwS/ faWztFzGVD1eT4Az4lz+hzpptsPh5wrmveP15mJd+eN53poLDjd0kwwnhR0RPP8r5fi1/IWp PTrzb5cVLOL8uD7/cPLTb4xPTdimXevL2bR8GouUuG7s3VeHhTd82yWkv/+R2K+Fll73OY7/ U2Ipzkg01GIuKk4EAKIphB3+AgAA Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:03:09 -0000 On Wed, 16 May 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:51:04AM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > Hello Ben, > > Thank you for your response. > > I cleaned and then copied the 82 file to 83 and then edited it > to replace all 82-s with 83 or added it where there seemed to be > a list of versions. It got a lot further, but now dies not finding > another file. > > ../rpc/types.h:77:27: error: rpc/netconfig.h: No such file or directory Ah, I see what is going on. This is an artifact of the old build system I inherited, which is no longer used for OpenAFS git master; unfortunately, the new code (which uses FreeBSD's standard kernel module building infrastructure) is not directly mergable to the OpenAFS 1.6.x branch, so the release version is still using the old build system. The "proper" way to fix it is to clean the work tree, redo the copying param.amd64_fbsd_82.h file, and then find this part of openafs-1.6.0/src/libafs/MakefileProto.FBSD.in: % -ln -fs ${KSRC}/nfs nfs % % -ln -fs /usr/include/rpc rpc % % -ln -fs ${KSRC}/rpc rpc % which is doing conditionals on the particular FreeBSD version to account for moved headers, instead of a more intelligent version number comparison. Add "-fbsd_83" to the first line ("all -fbsd_71 [...]") and "fbsd_83" to the second one ("fbsd_71 fbsd_72 [...]"), and then a build should get past this issue. However, if you just want it to build now, I think there is an easier fix. (I'm not 100% sure, since there are some ... weird ... things going on in this build system, and I haven't played with it recently.) Edit openafs-1.6.0/src/libafs/Makefile and find the line that has "-ln -fs /usr/include/rpc rpc" and change that to be "-ln -fs ${KSRC}/rpc rpc" instead (preserving the tab character at the beginning of the line). I expect that to let the build continue. Again, sorry for all these troubles; I'll bump up the priority of getting the port updated. -Ben Kaduk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 23:28:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A89106564A for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C9B8FC14 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 23:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JNSn67032903; Sat, 19 May 2012 17:28:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4JNSmDA032900; Sat, 19 May 2012 17:28:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:28:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120519210008.f1721985.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <4FB730B7.60009@dreamchaser.org> <4FB7DF67.1000603@dreamchaser.org> <20120519210008.f1721985.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 May 2012 17:28:49 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd@dreamchaser.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATI Radeon HD5500 driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:28:54 -0000 On Sat, 19 May 2012, Polytropon wrote: >> 3. The Xorg man page notes that should cause it to >> exit. However, it doesn't, and I had to use kill -TERM. Any hints on >> why doesn't cause it to exit? > > This is also a new default to _not_ work anymore. You have more > than two (if I remember correctly) options in making it work. > You'll find them in the Handbook: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html > > One possibility when X has been compiled _without_ HAL support > (and no hald running), placing > > Option "DontZap" "false" > > into the "ServerLayout" section should work. Additionally, I see > that I have > > Option "XkbOptions" "terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp" > > in the "InputDevice" section of "Keyboard0". It "just" works. :-) This should work whether or not HAL is installed or running.